Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 10 Feb 2009 (Tuesday) 00:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

post your favorite high key

 
Nicole ­ Faith
Senior Member
693 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Michigan
     
Feb 11, 2009 18:40 |  #31

Bobster wrote in post #7305215 (external link)
i see a uniform light in my photograph

I think the word "uniform" is being misunderstood here. Your image has fairly EVEN lighting. Which is different from the way a high key image would be lit. Your image still carries a range of tones throughout - there is still a difference in highlight and shadow areas - there is still some modeling to the child's face. What is being said is that all that should be removed or diminished. It has to be shot that way most of the time - though I am sure there could be a work around in PS? :)

JFusion wrote in post #7305327 (external link)
Usually there is low contrast between the subject and its back ground as well...

I mentioned something like this as well in my last post - I am not sure if my image counts either as it was my first try. But this thread does seem to carry all high contrast images instead of high key.


visit my website -> http://www.nicolepfeif​ferphotography.com (external link)
visit my blog -> http://www.blog.nicole​pfeifferphotography.co​m (external link)
add me on facebook -> http://www.facebook.co​m/nicolepfeifferphotog​raphy (external link)
http://nicolepfeifferp​hotography.blogspot.co​m/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bobster
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,668 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 3302
Joined May 2006
Location: Dorset, England
     
Feb 11, 2009 18:59 |  #32

well that being said the bride shot isn't a high key image either then, has more modeling light than my shot..


Robert Whetton (external link) Dorset Portrait & Events Photographer | Photoshop Guru
Gear | Gram (external link) | Ultimate Lens MA FoCal 2 (external link)| Ultimate RAW Editor C1 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nicole ­ Faith
Senior Member
693 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Michigan
     
Feb 11, 2009 19:10 |  #33

Bobster wrote in post #7306635 (external link)
well that being said the bride shot isn't a high key image either then, has more modeling light than my shot..

I thought the same thing as well.


visit my website -> http://www.nicolepfeif​ferphotography.com (external link)
visit my blog -> http://www.blog.nicole​pfeifferphotography.co​m (external link)
add me on facebook -> http://www.facebook.co​m/nicolepfeifferphotog​raphy (external link)
http://nicolepfeifferp​hotography.blogspot.co​m/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sunnygirl
Goldmember
Avatar
1,057 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia
     
Feb 11, 2009 22:50 |  #34

Hmmn... it gets interesting.
Lets hear some tips from the experts, so we can all get this right.


Susan
5D MKII - Accumulating way too much gear - bring on retirement so I have time to use it.......

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BristolHooligan
Member
121 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Bristol
     
Feb 12, 2009 17:36 as a reply to  @ sunnygirl's post |  #35

Ok to be honest I take everything I am told on EVERY forum, be it photography, bikes, people, computers whatever with a pinch of salt.

Benji, you may be right, you probably are and as such you have your opinion as do the rest of us, you take a little too much of a high and mighty attitude in pointing it out and as said by another member having to sign up to another forum just to view the images is not something I am going to do.

what IS high key? using a very well known piece of software on an image I took the other day and processing it to the HIGH KEY setting brought out a VERY contrasty image with quite a few shadows and of course highlights, so this goes against your definition! the fact that nearly every person posting on this thread put something up that does not fit in your definition(the correct definition) shows that the term is misunderstood. do we need your self righteous "Fourteen images and still only one high key image" posts? I would say no, I was very happy with my misunderstood thoughts about what made a high key image thank you very much!

I am not saying you should not inform people of an error or at least educate when needed, but there are ways of doing it without trying to insult! "maybe they cant read" maybe you came at this topic with an attitude that put others off even trying to read your famous post on another forum?

just my 2p do with what you will and take it however you want, no skin off my back!!


Daniel Wellby
www.danielwellby.co.uk (external link) EOS 5D & 40D + Battery Grip | EOS 100 | 10-22 f3.5-4.5 | 17-35 f2.8-4 DG HSM Sigma | 24-70 f2.8
L | 24-105 f4L | 28 f2.8 | 50 f1.4 | 70-200 f2.8L IS | 100 f2.8 Macro | 100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS | 430EX & 580EX II + accessories .

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joruiz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,619 posts
Likes: 313
Joined Oct 2006
     
Feb 12, 2009 23:42 |  #36

Well, you know what.. I took the time to register in the other forum... wow, I'm so glad I did. Benji and others have some reeeaally nice tutorials, I'll spend a good deal of time reading thru them.

Having said that, I'm sure Benji could have been a bit nicer here lol..

anyways, thanks Benji.


Cantisani
my facebook profile (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Chris&jess
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
322 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Redding, California
     
Feb 13, 2009 00:08 |  #37

Bravo Daniel.

Thank you for taking the time to voice what I've been thinking ever since this thread, which could have been fun and interesting, was trashed. Why would anyone post a photo here and risk insult and humiliation by a lurking jerk?
Chris


5D-M3, 5D-M2, (2)580 EX-II, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, 24-70 f/2.8L, 24-70 f/4L, 15mm f/2.8 fisheye, EF 1.4x II extender, Manfrotto 3021 BN w/ 488RC2 ballhead, (4) pocket wizards, Sekonic L-758DR, (4)Avenger A5029, (1) Avenger A5036CS, Aperture, photoshop CS5, (4)Elinchrom 600RX, Skyport, EL Octa, EL strip, Midi octa, Deep octa, (2)Speedo 22 w/grids, maxi-Spot, think-tank luggage, and Apple all the way www.HannaandCo.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Chris&jess
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
322 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Redding, California
     
Feb 13, 2009 00:35 |  #38

Benji,
Just because you have your own special definition of high-key, doesn't give you license to insult people. I happen to like the photos I posted here, and after doing a little research on high-key methods, I still consider them high key photos. Do they comply with your special criteria? Apparently not. Your style of photography does not comply with mine, but I didn't get abrasive, try to humiliate you, and look small in the process.
Chris


5D-M3, 5D-M2, (2)580 EX-II, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, 24-70 f/2.8L, 24-70 f/4L, 15mm f/2.8 fisheye, EF 1.4x II extender, Manfrotto 3021 BN w/ 488RC2 ballhead, (4) pocket wizards, Sekonic L-758DR, (4)Avenger A5029, (1) Avenger A5036CS, Aperture, photoshop CS5, (4)Elinchrom 600RX, Skyport, EL Octa, EL strip, Midi octa, Deep octa, (2)Speedo 22 w/grids, maxi-Spot, think-tank luggage, and Apple all the way www.HannaandCo.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blissonearth
Member
Avatar
222 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
     
Feb 13, 2009 01:02 as a reply to  @ post 7300720 |  #39

my daughter.. first time trial with my alien bees strobes, is this high key, benji ?


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


;)Canon 5D MKII, 430EX, 70-200 f4L IS 24-105 f4L, 135 f2 L 85 1.8, lowerpro flipside 400AW
Nikon D40 with 18-270 II tammy for playing!!!
www.mudpuddlephoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AcN
Member
Avatar
51 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Paris, France
     
Feb 13, 2009 04:03 |  #40

gosh... i guess no one has the same definition of high key...
Some REAL high key pics to me are like these : http://www.olivier-chauvignat.info/2009/6​/gallery2.html (external link) (all i can say is that guy is a god)

For me it's just the majority of the tonal range going on the right of the histogram... and NO burnt part on the skin, but the histogramm is the most important... that means : GET A CALIBRATOR ^^
I'd say rmr21 got the best HK shot here ^^


Gears : Canon 20D | Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 | Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L USM | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM | Swedish lightning stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Benji
Goldmember
2,220 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 27
Joined Jan 2006
Location: North east Indiana
     
Feb 13, 2009 08:31 |  #41

blissonearth wrote in post #7315743 (external link)
my daughter.. first time trial with my alien bees strobes, is this high key, benji ?

Bliss,

Well I guess it depends on what definition of high key you want to use. I have copied my posting on Photocamel below for one definition (which happend to be the one I use.)

"In Norman Phillips' book Lighting Techniques For High Key Portrait Photography we find a definitive definition of the photographic term high key, and I quote; "High key is the term used to describe photographs with white or bright backgrounds and usually with bright lighting situations that render subjects in a light tone similiar to that of the background. The ultimate high key portrait is one in which the background is a clean white and the subjects are also attired in white. High key exists wherever the predominant tones in the image are somewhat brighter than the middle key."

(The middle key in the digital world is 128 which is 18% gray and is exactly 1/2 way between pure black "0" and pure white "255.")

Kenneth Hoffman in his internet article on High Key Photography states: In photography [High key] can easily be acheived by choosing elements of a white or pastel color placed on a white or very light background."

From DIY Photography.net. "To create a high key image you need to set your exposure levels to a high degree but watch out not to overexpose. High key images lack contrast and also there is a lack of shadows in the picture."

About.com Photography says, "High key pictures [can] contain small areas of dark tones, for example in the iris of the eyes in a portrait."

New York Institute of Photography Dictionary of Photography says under High Key: "A photograph made up entirely of tones above the middle tone with no heavy shadows."

Lastly a definition from the Society of Wedding and Portrait Photographers (UK) and the British Professional Photographer's Association."High Key A scene with delicate tones or pastel colors. A photograph which contains large areas of light tones with few middle tones or shadows."

So according to the above, a high key image must have:
1. A white or very light pastel background.
2. Subjects(s) dressed in white or light pastel clothing.
3. Little or no contrast.
4. Little or no heavy shadows.
5. Few middle tones."


Now for the definition one gathers from reading postings on POTN and other photo related websites. Keep in mind most of these image makers are accountants, mechanics, automobile salesmen, and school teachers, (and assorted other occupations) during the day and photographers at night and on weekends. A high key image is any image with white in it. It usually has a white background and overexposed skin tones. I base this on the images posted in the above thread.

So in my opinion while your image has a white background and white clothing, it is overexposed, so it is a high contrast image not a high key image. It is beautiful however.

Hope this helps. :D

Benji




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AcN
Member
Avatar
51 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Paris, France
     
Feb 13, 2009 08:56 |  #42

lack of contrast in a high key image ? what the....

a real GOOD high key pic with a decent lightning + decent reflector or softbox (octa3 for instance, no bigger or it's gonna be too soft) got a high level of acutance, or "micro-contrast" call it as you want, you don't lose details. It's super light, almost overexposed, but you still got full details of the skin.
Take a look here : http://www.eos-numerique.com …utance-des-sources-54454/ (external link)
It explains the acutance of every modeler ^^ hope it helps


Gears : Canon 20D | Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 | Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L USM | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM | Swedish lightning stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JFusion
Senior Member
Avatar
851 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Dayton, Ohio
     
Feb 13, 2009 10:18 |  #43

Benji wrote in post #7317017 (external link)
So according to the above, a high key image must have:
1. A white or very light pastel background.
2. Subjects(s) dressed in white or light pastel clothing.
3. Little or no contrast.
4. Little or no heavy shadows.
5. Few middle tones."

Now for the definition one gathers from reading postings on POTN and other photo related websites. Keep in mind most of these image makers are accountants, mechanics, automobile salesmen, and school teachers, (and assorted other occupations) during the day and photographers at night and on weekends. A high key image is any image with white in it. It usually has a white background and overexposed skin tones. I base this on the images posted in the above thread.

So in my opinion while your image has a white background and white clothing, it is overexposed, so it is a high contrast image not a high key image. It is beautiful however.

Hope this helps. :D

Benji

I'll have to disagree that list just based on your own quotes. This is mostly because you described them as must have. The first 2 in your list are not requirements in a high key image. They are personal preferences for certain photographers, like wedding photographers for example where there can a good number of whites and pastels particularly in the brides party.

These three are consistent with each other and with the film definition and are probably the most accurate especially when referenced against each other and the actual definition found in the other quotes.

From DIY Photography.net. "To create a high key image you need to set your exposure levels to a high degree but watch out not to overexpose. High key images lack contrast and also there is a lack of shadows in the picture."

About.com Photography says, "High key pictures [can] contain small areas of dark tones, for example in the iris of the eyes in a portrait."

New York Institute of Photography Dictionary of Photography says under High Key: "A photograph made up entirely of tones above the middle tone with no heavy shadows."

The Norman Phillips and Kenneth Hoffman quotes lean toward what is the ultimate high key or how high can be achieved NOT that those elements are necessarily required. The "definitive definition of the photographic term high key" in the Norman Phillips quote describes something that can can be described as high key as in it falls in that category. This is backed up in the last sentence where high key is actually defined in that same quote, "High key exists wherever the predominant tones in the image are somewhat brighter than the middle key." and this also falls in line with the second sentence of your last quote, "A photograph which contains large areas of light tones with few middle tones or shadows" as well as the first three that I quoted.

So even just based on your own quotes (and even not being a full time photographer) it's easy to tell your list and some of the comments are opinions of ultimate/extreme high key, not necessarily the just actual definition.


Jeremi
http://www.jeremiblurt​on.com (external link)
JB Photography - Facebook Fan Page (external link)
5D Mark iii, 7D, 24-70 2.8L, 70-200 2.8L IS II, 100 Macro 2.8, Nifty, 100-400 4.5-5.6L and a bunch of other stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Benji
Goldmember
2,220 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 27
Joined Jan 2006
Location: North east Indiana
     
Feb 13, 2009 11:02 |  #44

Jeremi,

(Copy from above) "....The first 2 in your list are not requirements in a high key image. They are personal preferences for certain photographers..."

Sorry, but you are wrong. A high key image MUST have an all white or a light pastel background, and all white or light pastel clothing, period. And that is just for starters. :-)

Mr. Norman Phillips the above quoted photographer illustrates a high key image on the cover of the aforementioned book. It is a little girl dressed in all white, with an all white background . http://www.amazon.com …=1234544859&sr=​1-4#reader (external link)

Then after several intro pages he gets to the meat of what a high key image is with the quote I quoted earlier and posts this image on that same page to illustrate a high key image. http://www.amazon.com …=1234544859&sr=​1-4#reader (external link)

Benji




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blissonearth
Member
Avatar
222 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
     
Feb 13, 2009 11:04 as a reply to  @ Benji's post |  #45

I have those requirements, pastel color clothing, white background... the skin tone is almost the same with clothing.. the only thing she has brown hair, there is no way you can make this hair color like blonde, now I am confused.


;)Canon 5D MKII, 430EX, 70-200 f4L IS 24-105 f4L, 135 f2 L 85 1.8, lowerpro flipside 400AW
Nikon D40 with 18-270 II tammy for playing!!!
www.mudpuddlephoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

13,709 views & 5 likes for this thread, 38 members have posted to it.
post your favorite high key
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1769 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.