Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 10 Feb 2009 (Tuesday) 15:48
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Focussing with that 85mm...

 
J.Lynn.R
Member
105 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Indiana
     
Feb 10, 2009 15:48 |  #1

Hey y'all,

I've been shooting sports recently, mostly bball cause that's what's in season...and using my lovely new 85mm f/1.8, which seems to be surprisingly popular for sports shooting.

My question is, how much of the time are your images wildly or oddly out of focus...? I shot about 200 images the other night and of those about 38 or so were focussed correctly, and most of those were images of players not really moving...

Am I doing something wrong?

Settings have consistently been f/2.2, 1/640, and ISO1600...I go back and forth between AI Servo and one shot (or whatever it's called)...tried the thing where all the focus points are lit up, it wasn't particularly helpful...heh.

Ex:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 400 | MIME changed to 'text/plain'


This is as good as it gets:
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 400 | MIME changed to 'text/plain'


But mostly this happens:
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 400 | MIME changed to 'text/plain'


On a side note, I also have several dozen shots that would be excellent except for the part where the other tog's head is in the way....heh.

Rebel XT. 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6. 85mm f/1.8. Lensbaby 2.0.
Currently borrowing 7D, 50mm f/1.8, 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 Macro IS, Sigma 70-300 f/4.5-5.6.
I have a 220EX around somewhere....heh.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
G7-EOS
And I thought I had it bad in Joliet.
Avatar
745 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 28
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Chicagoland
     
Feb 10, 2009 16:18 |  #2

[QUOTE=J.Lynn.R;729769​0]...tried the thing where all the focus points are lit up, it wasn't particularly helpful...

Nice captures! You could try shooting with only the center focus point lit and I think your "keepers" will increase, and maybe venture up to f2.0 as well.


R6II | 24-70L | 70-200L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lauderdalems
Senior Member
759 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Jun 2006
     
Feb 10, 2009 16:26 |  #3

For basketball and the 85 lens, I always shoot 2.0 -2.4. So you should be ok there.

Also shoot center point and use the back button for focus. Remember you must hold the button in to maintain a focus on the moving target.


http://gamedayphotos.u​wa.edu/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mestes
Senior Member
Avatar
354 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Machesney Park, IL
     
Feb 10, 2009 17:18 |  #4

if you are shooting at f/1.8 the depth of field on that lens is so fine that you can easily have an object in focus and then have that focus change to the background really easily.


Name: Matt | Please put your First name in your signature. Thanks
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GetOnMyLevel
Senior Member
Avatar
538 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: LA
     
Feb 11, 2009 01:14 |  #5

just keep it at f/2 and use AI servo and center focus point.

you should be fine with that




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
George ­ E.
Member
241 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Medford, NJ
     
Feb 11, 2009 08:10 as a reply to  @ GetOnMyLevel's post |  #6

If you are using the XT in your signature, that could be some of the problem. I went from XT to XTi to 40d recently and each camera was better than the one before it (in terms of ability to correctly focus). The XTi gave me about 50% success and the 40d is hitting about 90% of the time (in dark gyms). I use the 85 1.8 in AI servo, center point.

George




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xOZx
Member
73 posts
Joined Jan 2009
     
Feb 11, 2009 09:20 |  #7

lauderdalems wrote in post #7297976 (external link)
Also shoot center point and use the back button for focus. Remember you must hold the button in to maintain a focus on the moving target.

This feature is new to me. Can you explain or point me to what it is called in the manual for this setting?

(BTW, I am using the XSi with the 85.. f/1.8 to shoot indoor swimming)


_______________
Rebel T2i (550D), EF 85mm f/1.8 USM, EF 50mm f/1.8 II, Sigma 120-400mm, Speedlite 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johndevane
Senior Member
Avatar
741 posts
Joined Dec 2007
     
Feb 11, 2009 10:00 |  #8

Custom Funtion 4.1 (Uses the * button for focus, and is highly reccomended)


MKIII, 40D, XTI, 70-200 f/4L, 100-400L, 17-85 IS, 85 1.8, 100 2.8 Macro, 580 EX II, 550 EX, Bee's, PW's

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
souporman
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2011
Avatar
5,463 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Sep 2006
Location: London, UK
     
Feb 11, 2009 10:33 |  #9

J.Lynn.R wrote in post #7297690 (external link)
Hey y'all,

I've been shooting sports recently, mostly bball cause that's what's in season...and using my lovely new 85mm f/1.8, which seems to be surprisingly popular for sports shooting.

My question is, how much of the time are your images wildly or oddly out of focus...? I shot about 200 images the other night and of those about 38 or so were focussed correctly, and most of those were images of players not really moving...

Am I doing something wrong?

Settings have consistently been f/2.2, 1/640, and ISO1600...I go back and forth between AI Servo and one shot (or whatever it's called)...tried the thing where all the focus points are lit up, it wasn't particularly helpful...heh.

Looks like you have some room to play with your settings there. 1/640th seems excessivly fast for basketball, you could probably get away with dropping it down almost a stop and either increasing your f-stop to 2.8 for more depth or bringing your ISO down. The XT line is pretty fuzzy with high ISO's so that might be part of it.

AI Servo & Center point focus are probably the way to go too, as previously mentioned.

Having said all that, I have have to say I've never shot basketball :) I do shoot a lot of fencing though, and even with the thin, fast moving blades I find 1/500th to be plenty fast enough and can often get away with less.

Just play around a bit, you'll get there in the end!


http://www.evilkitchen​.ca (external link) (365 (external link)) .
500px (external link)
Twitter (external link)http://365.evilkitchen​.ca (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
J.Lynn.R
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
105 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Indiana
     
Feb 11, 2009 17:36 |  #10

George E. wrote in post #7302370 (external link)
If you are using the XT in your signature, that could be some of the problem. I went from XT to XTi to 40d recently and each camera was better than the one before it (in terms of ability to correctly focus). The XTi gave me about 50% success and the 40d is hitting about 90% of the time (in dark gyms). I use the 85 1.8 in AI servo, center point.

George

I was wondering about that...shoot! Well I can't afford a different body at the moment, I'll just have to be more careful. I've noticed focus problems when doing portraits as well...I can deal with it though.

Looks like center point and AI Servo is the way to go...will set that back button next time I go to shoot sports.


Rebel XT. 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6. 85mm f/1.8. Lensbaby 2.0.
Currently borrowing 7D, 50mm f/1.8, 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 Macro IS, Sigma 70-300 f/4.5-5.6.
I have a 220EX around somewhere....heh.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
montanafan
Member
162 posts
Joined Oct 2006
     
Feb 12, 2009 02:22 as a reply to  @ J.Lynn.R's post |  #11

Like Souporman said, maybe you could try 2.5 or 2.8, but more than likely you're probably just slightly off on your focus point. I had the same kind of problem until I made myself really concentrate on keeping the center focusing point right on the upper chest of my subject at all times. A couple of other things to keep in mind are that it's a little more difficult when focusing on white uniforms (seems like the lens wants to grab something in the background with a little more contrast) and when the subject is coming right at you.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sfinkernagel
Senior Member
464 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 141
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Pocono Lake, PA USA
     
Feb 12, 2009 09:45 |  #12

I don't wish to hijack the thread, but I have another question regarding the back button focus option.

Why is that any different than holding the shutter halfway? If I am using manual exposure, (as I usually do in a gym) then it seems to me that the 1/2 shutter is only focussing- which would be the same as the back button. The shutter, however, gives me one less button to press- it seems simpler.

It has been suggested many time to use the back button for focus with sports, so maybe I am missing something- can anyone explain?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Big ­ K
Goldmember
2,021 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: West Central Indiana
     
Feb 12, 2009 13:52 |  #13

souporman wrote in post #7303154 (external link)
Looks like you have some room to play with your settings there. 1/640th seems excessivly fast for basketball, you could probably get away with dropping it down almost a stop and either increasing your f-stop to 2.8 for more depth or bringing your ISO down. The XT line is pretty fuzzy with high ISO's so that might be part of it.

AI Servo & Center point focus are probably the way to go too, as previously mentioned.

Having said all that, I have have to say I've never shot basketball :) I do shoot a lot of fencing though, and even with the thin, fast moving blades I find 1/500th to be plenty fast enough and can often get away with less.

Just play around a bit, you'll get there in the end!

I disagree with this. 1/640 is not extreme for basketball and in my opinion is the low end of acceptable. Do everything you can to keep your shutter speed as fast as possible.

While the DOF of the 85 is pretty thin, the gains from stopping down the aperture are not as major as you might think. Wtih the 85 shooting from 20ft away your DOF is as follows: At f/1.8 - 1.13 feet. At f/2.2 - 1.42 feet. At f/2.8 - 1.79 feet. So, going from 1.8 to 2.8 only increases your total DOF by 8 inches and this is spit between front and back.

The other option that I have not seen mentioned is that your lens and camera may need to be calibrated together by Canon. If you are consistently getting OOF images under a variety of conditions, this is a likely cause of the trouble.

sfinkernagel wrote in post #7310538 (external link)
I don't wish to hijack the thread, but I have another question regarding the back button focus option.

Why is that any different than holding the shutter halfway? If I am using manual exposure, (as I usually do in a gym) then it seems to me that the 1/2 shutter is only focussing- which would be the same as the back button. The shutter, however, gives me one less button to press- it seems simpler.

It has been suggested many time to use the back button for focus with sports, so maybe I am missing something- can anyone explain?

Shooting manual, there is no difference. This is a personal style thing and does not offer any technological advantage when shooting fully manual exposure.


Name: Kevin
Follow my daily work at www.ks-images.com (external link) and feel free to C&C anything I post.
Gear List
More money than skill - but I'm working on it

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
J.Lynn.R
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
105 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Indiana
     
Feb 12, 2009 17:07 |  #14

Big K wrote in post #7312071 (external link)
While the DOF of the 85 is pretty thin, the gains from stopping down the aperture are not as major as you might think. Wtih the 85 shooting from 20ft away your DOF is as follows: At f/1.8 - 1.13 feet. At f/2.2 - 1.42 feet. At f/2.8 - 1.79 feet. So, going from 1.8 to 2.8 only increases your total DOF by 8 inches and this is spit between front and back.

The other option that I have not seen mentioned is that your lens and camera may need to be calibrated together by Canon. If you are consistently getting OOF images under a variety of conditions, this is a likely cause of the trouble.

.

That is an incredibly useful bit of information. I will definitely make sure to remember that...

Actually, that sounds incredibly likely...I've taken several sets of portrait shots with odd focus problems lately...totally don't have the money to have it done though, neither camera nor lens are under warranty.

I used to shoot bball with that basic 75-300 lens (f/4-5.6, I think?), and I always got better results with manual focusing. Is that worth a try with the 85mm?


Rebel XT. 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6. 85mm f/1.8. Lensbaby 2.0.
Currently borrowing 7D, 50mm f/1.8, 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 Macro IS, Sigma 70-300 f/4.5-5.6.
I have a 220EX around somewhere....heh.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Big ­ K
Goldmember
2,021 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: West Central Indiana
     
Feb 12, 2009 17:26 |  #15

J.Lynn.R wrote in post #7313290 (external link)
I used to shoot bball with that basic 75-300 lens (f/4-5.6, I think?), and I always got better results with manual focusing. Is that worth a try with the 85mm?

It would be worth a try but I am afraid you would be disappointed with the results. Your other lens, since it is f/4-5.6 was probably more forgiving regarding DOF which is what allowed you to get some good results.

You might check on the cost to get it calibrated. It might not be as bad as you think and if that is the problem, it will save you lots of frustration.

Good luck.


Name: Kevin
Follow my daily work at www.ks-images.com (external link) and feel free to C&C anything I post.
Gear List
More money than skill - but I'm working on it

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,060 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Focussing with that 85mm...
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is bzguy
1599 guests, 174 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.