Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 10 Feb 2009 (Tuesday) 19:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Cropping

 
dissolve
Member
83 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Feb 10, 2009 19:34 |  #1

Just a quick question to get a feel for what you all do. When cropping to post online or just for your own collection, do you usually restrain to the same aspect ratio (3:2 I think) or do you do it freely? If freely, what do you do if you decide to print? Add a border or crop differently? I know non-destructive programs make this less of a concern, but I'm just curious. Thanks for the input.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bobster
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,668 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 3301
Joined May 2006
Location: Dorset, England
     
Feb 10, 2009 19:37 |  #2

cropping is done in camera for me


Robert Whetton (external link) Dorset Portrait & Events Photographer | Photoshop Guru
Gear | Gram (external link) | Ultimate Lens MA FoCal 2 (external link)| Ultimate RAW Editor C1 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peano
Goldmember
Avatar
1,778 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Aug 2007
     
Feb 10, 2009 21:19 |  #3

I don't crop to a specific ratio unless there's a reason -- such as restrictions on a particular website, or if I'm cropping for print. I always set the crop tool (in Photoshop) to "hide" rather than "delete" so I can undo the crop later if I want to.


---
Peano
RadiantPics.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
seaside
Slapped with a ridiculous title
Avatar
5,472 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2008
Location: North Carolina Coast but traveling the Americas
     
Feb 10, 2009 21:20 |  #4

Hum... if I understand you correctly I'd have to answer by saying I always keep a master copy of all my "keepers". Any changes made are to a copy. So, if I make any changes I always have a couple originals stored on CD, etc.. The other option is working with layers. Changes can be made over and over with a layered file that hasn't been flattened.

I do at times crop an image. Shooting group portraits with a wide angle at times necessitates centering the group when framing leaving extra space around them. This trick helps eliminate distortion - then cropping out the extra space during PP.

If you didn't have access to an image program or don't do a lot of post processing I'd say make a duplicate copy of the original each time you need to use it for something like the web vs. printing an 8X10.

Hope this helps.


Chris
Creative Tools / ZENFOLIO (external link)
Someone stole all of my photography equipment and replaced it with exact duplicates.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dissolve
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
83 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Feb 10, 2009 23:11 |  #5

seaside wrote in post #7300052 (external link)
Hum... if I understand you correctly I'd have to answer by saying I always keep a master copy of all my "keepers". Any changes made are to a copy. So, if I make any changes I always have a couple originals stored on CD, etc.. The other option is working with layers. Changes can be made over and over with a layered file that hasn't been flattened.

I do at times crop an image. Shooting group portraits with a wide angle at times necessitates centering the group when framing leaving extra space around them. This trick helps eliminate distortion - then cropping out the extra space during PP.

If you didn't have access to an image program or don't do a lot of post processing I'd say make a duplicate copy of the original each time you need to use it for something like the web vs. printing an 8X10.

Hope this helps.

I'm only really asking out of curiosity. I've been using Apple's Aperture for edits, so I know everything is completely non-destructive. I try to crop so that if I went to print it would be a simple export without changing anything. I guess I was just interested to see how others go about it. Thanks for all the input!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Feb 11, 2009 03:14 |  #6

I crop all the time. Most frequently I crop to a 4:5 aspect ratio (which would go for an 8x10 print) and a 3:4 aspect ratio for a 12x16 print. I crop for effect -- many shots just look better at a less-wide aspect ratio.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Feb 11, 2009 03:32 |  #7

Always keep the original. I occasionally crop for an album or a print if a customer requests it, but typically I go for 3:2 or 16:9 personally.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlphaChicken
Knot Hank
Avatar
3,569 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Asheville, NC
     
Feb 11, 2009 12:37 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #8

dissolve wrote in post #7299303 (external link)
Just a quick question to get a feel for what you all do. When cropping to post online or just for your own collection, do you usually restrain to the same aspect ratio (3:2 I think) or do you do it freely? If freely, what do you do if you decide to print? Add a border or crop differently? I know non-destructive programs make this less of a concern, but I'm just curious. Thanks for the input.

I either always use the original 3:2 ratio or I use a square or I use the medium format 8x10 (4:5 ratio).

Bobster wrote in post #7299326 (external link)
cropping is done in camera for me

Completely irrelevant...His question was about ratios, not where or when you do your crop...


I am Henry. NOT Hank. And certainly not a length of rope tied in a knot. ;)
My family calls me Hen, but you can call me Chicken. See you out there!
|Deviant Art (external link)
|Facebook (external link)|Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dissolve
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
83 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Feb 11, 2009 18:39 |  #9

tonylong wrote in post #7301608 (external link)
I crop all the time. Most frequently I crop to a 4:5 aspect ratio (which would go for an 8x10 print) and a 3:4 aspect ratio for a 12x16 print. I crop for effect -- many shots just look better at a less-wide aspect ratio.

That brings up exactly my point of the post. I've seen commonly used print sizes and several aspect ratios are used. When I go through my photos there are plenty of areas I want to crop out but it doesn't fit the 3:2 aspect ratio I try to adhere to. So my question is: is it worth it to try and maintain an aspect ratio for all photos.

I guess you answered it though; since different print sizes are different ratios, it only really matters when you go to print. Oh, and I always keep masters untouched, which is why this isn't a huge concern, just a question of interest. As always, thank you everyone!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Feb 11, 2009 21:01 |  #10

In the past dozen weddings i've cropped two images to non-standard sizes. Since my albums can have images any size it doesn't much matter. For prints it would be more of an issue.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Feb 11, 2009 23:10 |  #11

When looking at the aesthetic reasons to crop, Luminous Landscape has an interesting essay on the topic. HERE IS THE LINK. (external link) In the final analysis, you must let the image and it's message tell you where to crop*, not the shape of the sensor.


When I was printing film, I cropped everything. And by that, I mean everything. I used one of these:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


A Four Blade Easel, which meant that I would print only the area where the interest was, without regard to aspect ratio. I always viewed the negative as containing the image plus periphery. Unless I had a specific need (assignment, to fit a certain frame, etc) I don't think I EVER printed in a 3:2 aspect ratio. Or any other even numbered aspect ratio for that matter.

Now with digital, for some reason, it is SO HARD for me to crop. I don't know why. Once I open the shot in Photoshop, it seems as though every pixel is sacred. So now, it is with a conscious effort that I break free of the 3:2 boundaries.


Rad

*Now keep in mind that what an image tells you and what it tells me might be two completely different things - that's where the artist's sensabilities come in

.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dissolve
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
83 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Feb 12, 2009 00:21 as a reply to  @ Radtech1's post |  #12

Radtech1, thank you for your ideas and link, it helps a lot. I have a new question now. I haven't started printing any of my shots yet but I just assumed that most print places only had paper that fit with standard aspect ratios. Is that the case?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Feb 12, 2009 01:26 |  #13

In which case you add a white (or whatever) border to fill the vacancy between the "aesthetic" crop and the standard print paper, then cut.

Rad


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dissolve
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
83 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Feb 12, 2009 01:34 |  #14

Radtech1 wrote in post #7308969 (external link)
In which case you add a white (or whatever) border to fill the vacancy between the "aesthetic" crop and the standard print paper, then cut.

Rad

Sounds completely reasonable. Won't be afraid to crop to dimensions other than 3:2 anymore :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jetboy
Senior Member
254 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: SoCal
     
Feb 12, 2009 03:56 |  #15

AlphaChicken wrote in post #7303986 (external link)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobster
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'

cropping is done in camera for me

Completely irrelevant...His question was about ratios, not where or when you do your crop...

Not irrelevant at all. In camera is a 2:3 ratio, so, that was his answer.

Personally, since I post my images on smugmug for family to order prints and most simply order the 4x6 size, I maintain my crops to the 2:3 ratio so they receive the image as I have intended. Not how they or smugmug will automatically crop. I also don't mind the 8x12 and 16x20 sizes so it also works for enlargements. Mind you, I keep all original RAW files, so, for my personal prints then the image will dictate the print ratio. For family its mostly 2:3.


Canon XSi | Σ 30mm f/1.4 | EF 50mm f/1.8 II | EF-S 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 IS | EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,921 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Cropping
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is SteveeY
1626 guests, 172 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.