Kata 3N1-20 review

I think that would work, but is that three flashes you're trying to represent, there? And you're okay with the lens cap of the 50 being on top of the rear lens cap of the 100 (i.e. stacked on top of each other)? It would take some divider shuffling, but I think this can be done with the -20.

I got one of these a couple of days ago. Great piece of kit.

I have been using my 20 for about 3 months now and loving it!
This is my day to day carry bag (one of many bags) and holds everything I need. the 70-200 goes it the top as it wont fit well mounted on the 50D but everything else I carry fits in the lower section (24-70 mounted, 10-20, 50, 430EX + various accessories)
However the 50D wont sit on the bottom (as seen in the op) with the grip attached.

Whoa! How did you do that effect?

jdetmold wrote in post #8429696
I have been using my 20 for about 3 months now and loving it!
This is my day to day carry bag (one of many bags) and holds everything I need. the 70-200 goes it the top as it wont fit well mounted on the 50D but everything else I carry fits in the lower section (24-70 mounted, 10-20, 50, 430EX + various accessories)
However the 50D wont sit on the bottom (as seen in the op) with the grip attached.

Great bag! 9/10 the only thing I would change is the way the inserts mount so it would be more configurable for a gripped camera.

Do you have a picture of the 70-200 in the top pocket?

tigerotor77w wrote in post #8430530
Whoa! How did you do that effect?

The effect is achieved by taking two shots, one of the bag open one closed. then putting both on separate layers in photoshop and masking out the closed top revealing the inside, then to make it look more transparent make a second copy of the top layer and set the opacity to somewhere around 20% depending on the image.
this technique works great on all sorts of images, you see it most often on car hoods revealing the engine beneath

lblaod wrote in post #8430654
Do you have a picture of the 70-200 in the top pocket?

I don't but would be happy to snap one tomorrow!

jdetmold wrote in post #8430893
The effect is achieved by taking two shots, one of the bag open one closed. then putting both on separate layers in photoshop and masking out the closed top revealing the inside, then to make it look more transparent make a second copy of the top layer and set the opacity to somewhere around 20% depending on the image.
this technique works great on all sorts of images, you see it most often on car hoods revealing the engine beneath

How little I know about Photoshop. I suspected that was how it was done but wanted to make sure.

lblaod wrote in post #8430654
Do you have a picture of the 70-200 in the top pocket?

As requested
You can see, the top holds the 70-200, the hood for the 24-70 and my memory card holder. All with room to spare.

jdetmold wrote in post #8436065
As requested
You can see, the top holds the 70-200, the hood for the 24-70 and my memory card holder. All with room to spare.

Thanks for taking the time to take the pic. this bag looks great

lblaod wrote in post #8462236
Thanks for taking the time to take the pic. this bag looks great

not a problem!

bringing this thread back to life.

I have a 3mdh, 5mdh, and now require a 7mdh. But instead of the 7mdh, I was looking for something I can use as a backpack/sling and found this bag.

Will it fit my gear in the sig + the 430ex? Many thx.

The bag can carry it all, but you'd have to put something (lens or lens+flash) in the top compartment. You'll be able to carry any of your lenses mounted to the T1i, that's for sure, but I don't think you'd be able to get all the lenses into the bottom compartment. (If you do it cleverly, perhaps, but not the way I've set mine up.)

Thanks Tiger. I really want to keep that top portion free of lens/flash. And I can't imagine, after looking at your pics, how I could fit the body and 4 lens + flash in the main chamber. especially since the 17-55 is huge, as you know.

Yeah -- it'd definitely be tiiiiight.

Hold a tripod?