Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 28 Mar 2005 (Monday) 21:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Why doesnt anyone talk about the 28-300

 
timmyquest
Goldmember
4,172 posts
Joined Dec 2003
Location: Outside of Chicago
     
Mar 28, 2005 21:23 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

Wow...

I always shrugged this lens off because of it's HUGE zoom range, but damn...go look up some of the images on pbase

http://www.pbase.com …/ef_28-300_35-56_l_is_usm (external link)

It's damn impressive...and talk about a nice walk around lens, this thing does it all :shock:


Capturing life a fraction of a second at a time

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poke
Senior Member
Avatar
380 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Perth, Western Australia
     
Mar 28, 2005 21:28 |  #2

If I'm thinking of the same one... it has the push pull action, which I didn't like. It was about $1000 more than the 70-200 when I looked. It also was f3.5-5.6 I think, and I was after a fast lense.

All said and done, I love the 70-200mm f2.8L IS. If they were to come out with an f2.8 version of the 28 - 300, I would definately jump at it.


Canon 50D, 400D, 24-105mm f4L, 50mm f1.8, 100mm f2.8, 580EX
Canon Fodder (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Mar 28, 2005 21:53 |  #3

They do ;)


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Mar 28, 2005 22:01 |  #4

https://photography-on-the.net …?t=31610&highli​ght=28-300
https://photography-on-the.net …?t=56399&highli​ght=28-300
https://photography-on-the.net …?t=64347&highli​ght=28-300
https://photography-on-the.net …=50417&highligh​t=28-300mm
https://photography-on-the.net …=36459&highligh​t=28-300mm


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SDK^
Senior Member
265 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 7
Joined May 2004
Location: UK
     
Mar 29, 2005 11:07 as a reply to  @ CyberDyneSystems's post |  #5

It's a good quality lens but who needs 28mm and 300mm on the same shoot ?!?!
Most if not all of those photos in the first post look like they are the telephoto end. In which case a 300mm F4 would have been a better choice :)


:: Sony A7 III | Sigma 12-24 | Sigma 24a | Sony 55, 85 and 135 F1.8 | Canon 100 Macro L IS ::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Mar 29, 2005 11:39 as a reply to  @ SDK^'s post |  #6

SDK^ wrote:
It's a good quality lens but who needs 28mm and 300mm on the same shoot ?!?!

Photojournalists, travelers/tourists who need to keep their luggage down, people shooting in adverse conditions (don't want to expose the internals to dust/moisture/salt spray while changing lenses), people in search of a good walk-around lens, shall I continue?


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poke
Senior Member
Avatar
380 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Perth, Western Australia
     
Mar 29, 2005 16:32 as a reply to  @ Jon's post |  #7

Jon wrote:
Photojournalists, travelers/tourists who need to keep their luggage down, people shooting in adverse conditions (don't want to expose the internals to dust/moisture/salt spray while changing lenses), people in search of a good walk-around lens, shall I continue?

I definately considered buying it for a walkaround lense. But in the end, the lure of the faster f2.8 won me over. :D


Canon 50D, 400D, 24-105mm f4L, 50mm f1.8, 100mm f2.8, 580EX
Canon Fodder (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Avatar
12,749 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
     
Mar 29, 2005 17:21 |  #8

Its a biggun for wandering around. But its a great, durable tool for the photographer who has to respond to fast-changing environments. It loses a notch or two to the finer zooms like the 24-70 or 70-200, but it serves its purpose very well.

I've looked at it with some desire, but decided to save my cash for now, as I don't find myself in situations where I need it.


Tom
5D IV, M5, RP, & various lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DionM
Senior Member
355 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 24
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Mar 29, 2005 17:26 |  #9

I too would not mind one, but I can't help but think that a 17mm prime, 70-200 f4 and a 1.4x extender would be perhaps a better kit. Albeit more lens changing, but still lightweight.


Gear List
Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Mar 30, 2005 03:52 |  #10

Might have something to do with the price, as well :lol:

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HKFEVER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,077 posts
Gallery: 183 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2069
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Hong Kong
     
Mar 30, 2005 04:43 |  #11

timmyquest wrote:
Wow...

I always shrugged this lens off because of it's HUGE zoom range, but damn...go look up some of the images on pbase

http://www.pbase.com …/ef_28-300_35-56_l_is_usm (external link)

It's damn impressive...and talk about a nice walk around lens, this thing does it all :shock:

From the above http, it is not that sharp and at 28mm it has some flare at the upper right corner.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
the7ferret
Member
86 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Riverside
     
Mar 31, 2005 01:57 |  #12

its a photojournalist lens.
Allows quick access to a large focal length which good sharpness. However its not the best for anything else cause it dosent let in enough light.


Elan 7n / 300D / 20D, 24-70 f2.8L, EF 70-200mm f4L, EFS 18-55mm, EF 50mm f1.8 II, 550ex

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timmyquest
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
4,172 posts
Joined Dec 2003
Location: Outside of Chicago
     
Mar 31, 2005 08:37 as a reply to  @ HKFEVER's post |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

HKFEVER wrote:
From the above http, it is not that sharp and at 28mm it has some flare at the upper right corner.


:rolleyes:

I gave you a link to 550 photos and you seem to be commenting on one :confused:

http://www.pbase.com/i​mage/34383964 (external link)
http://www.pbase.com/i​mage/34419742 (external link)

Looks sharp to me.


Capturing life a fraction of a second at a time

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HKFEVER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,077 posts
Gallery: 183 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2069
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Hong Kong
     
Mar 31, 2005 09:16 as a reply to  @ timmyquest's post |  #14

Any shoots with 300mm length wide open.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MariaLanevski
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Apr 2005
     
Apr 04, 2005 11:34 |  #15

I was very happy with 28-300 at the beginning, though a little too dark, but now it's gone out of focus. I can't get the focus right, all pics are out of focus. Could it be because of the lense weight?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,291 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
Why doesnt anyone talk about the 28-300
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1480 guests, 132 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.