Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 16 Feb 2009 (Monday) 21:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Using a wireless flash underwater.......

 
Moppie
Moderator
Avatar
15,102 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 451
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Akarana, Aotearoa. (Kiwiland)
     
Feb 16, 2009 21:25 |  #1

As a bit of a back story, some friends have an interesting shapped pool, and I have some ideas for shooting people floating in it.


I also have a several Cactus transmitters and recievers with the ariel mod (thanks Tim), and a pile of flashes that cost $1-5.

I was wondering if anyone has tried putting a flash and reciever in a plastic bag, and working it under water?

If not can anyone explain how the water might or might not interfer with the radio signal, and how if it will effect the guide number on the flash?


The pool is only about 6-8 feet deep, and I was thinking of sinking a flash in a plastic bag to the bottom of the pool to light someone from underneath.

The flashes are either fixed power, or have an Auto-thyristor, and as you can imagine I am bit reluctant to sink my 550EX incase the bag leaks :eek:


flickr (external link)

Have you Calibrated your Monkey lately?

Now more than ever we need to be a community, working together and for each other, as photographers, as lovers of photography and as members of POTN.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ Photo
Senior Member
Avatar
533 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 38
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Boston, Ma
     
Feb 16, 2009 21:51 |  #2

I cant help with the specifics but I know Ive seen people bag canon flashes for lighting underwater. But if youre worried about it leaking you can get water proof clear bags for electronics at most camping stores Like REI. Hopefully someone can answer the RS question I'm also interested in this.


Instagram (external link)
MIKE PHOTO

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nadtz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,483 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2005
     
Feb 16, 2009 21:54 |  #3

Something like http://strobist.blogsp​ot.com …iy-pvc-flash-housing.html (external link) ? Keep in mind radio waves and water dont mix, depending on the distance underwater you may find you will need to run some cables. There have been reviews of various cheapie bags and what not as well, from what I remember there were variouslevels of leakage with various products. A well sealed plastic bag would probably work fine, but ymmv of course.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
F4 ­ Cyborg
Senior Member
Avatar
952 posts
Joined Dec 2008
     
Feb 16, 2009 22:54 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

ya gota love vacuum seal bags.


Cyborg: part Man, part Machine (the machine gives a hoot!)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CrisUK
Junior Member
23 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Leeds, UK.
     
Feb 17, 2009 16:31 |  #5

This sounds like a really interesting idea.

Would it not be easier not to use flash and just to sink a watertight mains light under your subject, making sure it's run off an RCD of course :)

That way you don't have to worry about triggering anything, and all you need to do it bump up the ISO etc... to get your exposure.

Cheers

Cris.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Moppie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Moderator
Avatar
15,102 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 451
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Akarana, Aotearoa. (Kiwiland)
     
Feb 17, 2009 17:49 |  #6

CrisUK wrote in post #7346778 (external link)
This sounds like a really interesting idea.

Would it not be easier not to use flash and just to sink a watertight mains light under your subject, making sure it's run off an RCD of course :)

That way you don't have to worry about triggering anything, and all you need to do it bump up the ISO etc... to get your exposure.

Cheers

Cris.

I don't have any mains powered lights, but there would also be a problem with cables running in and out of the shot.

Otherwise it sounds like a good way to have a shocking good time


flickr (external link)

Have you Calibrated your Monkey lately?

Now more than ever we need to be a community, working together and for each other, as photographers, as lovers of photography and as members of POTN.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
epatt250
Senior Member
769 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Central, Arkansas
     
Feb 17, 2009 19:17 |  #7

I was thinking about doing something in a pool this summer and using those big huge pickle jars. Empty them ofcourse, then drop a speedlight in with a gel and a optical slave sensor.

Not sure it will work but its what I was/am going to try. The problem I see is making the things sink that way. Still working on that part.


Gear- Why do you care? If my image is good it's good, if it sucks it sucks. It's most likely my own fault.
www.elipattersonphoto.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Moppie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Moderator
Avatar
15,102 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 451
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Akarana, Aotearoa. (Kiwiland)
     
Feb 18, 2009 03:20 |  #8

I was going to use a zip lock bag, blown up it will have enough postive pressure to force out any water for long enough to take the photo.

Strap some string around it, and tie that to a big rock, then use another length of string and a small float on the surface so the model has a mark to line up on.

If it does leak I don't lose much, just a $5 flash and a trigger.


What I am more interested in is will the radio trigger work under water, and how does the water effect the flashes guide number?


flickr (external link)

Have you Calibrated your Monkey lately?

Now more than ever we need to be a community, working together and for each other, as photographers, as lovers of photography and as members of POTN.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Papa ­ Carlo
Senior Member
587 posts
Joined Jun 2008
     
Feb 18, 2009 08:55 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

Forget about cactus underwater. they are struggling even in the air :-(. I am pretty much sure PW will also fail.
An optical slave (external link) might work though.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Moppie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Moderator
Avatar
15,102 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 451
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Akarana, Aotearoa. (Kiwiland)
     
Mar 08, 2009 04:46 |  #10

So, I gave it ago, and I can report the following:

The catus triggers will work underwater to depth of about 30cm.
Beyond that they fail to fire.

The optical trigger would also work to a similar depth, and then it to would also fail to fire.


I ended up putting the flash in a glass jar, which did a great job of protecting it, and I weight it down with some rocks in a plastic bag around the jar.
Water did get in the plastic bag after I grazed it on the concrete though.


flickr (external link)

Have you Calibrated your Monkey lately?

Now more than ever we need to be a community, working together and for each other, as photographers, as lovers of photography and as members of POTN.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
epatt250
Senior Member
769 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Central, Arkansas
     
Mar 08, 2009 11:16 |  #11

Where are the pics?


Gear- Why do you care? If my image is good it's good, if it sucks it sucks. It's most likely my own fault.
www.elipattersonphoto.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nadtz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,483 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2005
     
Mar 08, 2009 14:47 |  #12

I said radio and water dont mix! Id also like to see the end result if you think they are worth posting.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
40Dude6aedyk
Goldmember
1,064 posts
Joined Jun 2008
     
Mar 08, 2009 14:54 |  #13

But did you try to extend the radio antenna from the depths to above the surface of the water? Maybe then you would not call it "wireless", but "wired" instead. :)


Canon 40D; Canon 70-200 mm f/2.8L IS, 17-55mm f/2.8 IS, 85 mm f/1.8; 580EX II; Sigma EF-530 DG Super; CyberSyncs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Moppie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Moderator
Avatar
15,102 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 451
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Akarana, Aotearoa. (Kiwiland)
     
Mar 08, 2009 16:06 |  #14

Well here is one result, but with no underwater flash.
I wanted to back light her in the pool as well, and make the dress a little trasnlucent.


I might try it again, if I can, and use a PC sync cord running from the flash under the water, to a radio reciever on the surface. Then I will just have to clone out the cord.
Just have to find away to seal the flash in something that will allow the cord out.


IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v31/Moppie/IMG_0888-Edit.jpg

flickr (external link)

Have you Calibrated your Monkey lately?

Now more than ever we need to be a community, working together and for each other, as photographers, as lovers of photography and as members of POTN.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Terrywoodenpic
Senior Member
Avatar
869 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Saddleworth England
     
Mar 08, 2009 16:20 |  #15

Looks like a small girl in a large water filled coffin... I would prefer her a little nearer the middle. This has a lot of potential.


Terry_______________
Over 60 years in photography
wasted money cameras never on film.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,345 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Using a wireless flash underwater.......
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1045 guests, 107 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.