At f/1.6
krzysztofr Mostly Lurking 11 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: Poland More info | Dec 18, 2010 17:58 | #1816 |
treblekicker Member 105 posts Likes: 4 Joined Apr 2009 More info |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Ross_Curtis Member 184 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2006 Location: Herts More info | Dec 21, 2010 02:54 | #1818 Shot at F1.8  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. 6D | 24L II | 50MP | 85L II | 200L II | 16-35L F4 IS | Manfrotto 190CXPRO4 | Markings Q10 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thenextguy Goldmember  More info | Dec 23, 2010 23:24 | #1819 |
jwcdds Cream of the Crop  More info | Dec 24, 2010 00:33 | #1820 ^ Very nice!  Julian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thenextguy Goldmember More info | Dec 24, 2010 01:26 | #1821 |
hieu1004 Goldmember  3,579 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jul 2010 Location: Seattle More info | Dec 24, 2010 16:52 | #1822 I must be really unlucky - I had to micro-adjust mine +15 due to a little front focus. My old Sigma was a +15 as well - but all my other ones are fine. This is after UPS tried to deliver to the wrong address and then lost my package for a few hours. However, after micro-adjusting and getting it the way I like - I realize it was worth the trouble!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Palna Senior Member  548 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2009 More info | Natural light
Palna Best Regards, Mikkel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SimD Member 53 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Montréal More info |  7D + 24Lii + Winter in Montréal. 7D + 24LII + EFS 10-22mm + 50mm + 430ex II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jwcdds Cream of the Crop More info | Dec 25, 2010 01:11 | #1825 hieu1004 wrote in post #11509578 I must be really unlucky - I had to micro-adjust mine +15 due to a little front focus. My old Sigma was a +15 as well - but all my other ones are fine. This is after UPS tried to deliver to the wrong address and then lost my package for a few hours. However, after micro-adjusting and getting it the way I like - I realize it was worth the trouble! What kind of light are you shooting in? I found I needed +9 when shooting indoors under tungsten. But was around 0 when shooting fluorescent. Julian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hieu1004 Goldmember 3,579 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jul 2010 Location: Seattle More info | Dec 25, 2010 01:33 | #1826 jwcdds wrote in post #11511062 What kind of light are you shooting in? I found I needed +9 when shooting indoors under tungsten. But was around 0 when shooting fluorescent.  So I just keep it at around +9 since I use it mostly indoors to take photos of my kid.It's been just in indoor tungsten - and also sunlight - they both seems pretty consistent at +15 MA. It could be my 7D actually - most my primes in the past required MA due to some front focus. Oh well - it's amazingly sharp now and I love the color SOOC - love this lens already!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hedu Member  151 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: Finland More info | Dec 25, 2010 01:53 | #1827 Great one,but the eyes doesn`t look natural to me..maybe too sharp? 5D mark II | 16-35 II L| 70 - 200 2.8 II L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hieu1004 Goldmember 3,579 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jul 2010 Location: Seattle More info | Dec 25, 2010 02:52 | #1828 |
boris65 Member 164 posts Joined Dec 2007 More info | Dec 25, 2010 09:16 | #1829 Very nice picture!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Palna Senior Member 548 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2009 More info | Dec 25, 2010 15:06 | #1830 Thank you very much Boris: -) Best Regards, Mikkel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1821 guests, 119 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
