Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 22 Feb 2009 (Sunday) 09:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Moving my Ohio State HDR Thread Here...

 
CAL ­ Imagery
Goldmember
Avatar
3,375 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2008
Location: O-H
     
Feb 22, 2009 09:44 |  #1

http://www.facebook.co​m/album.php?ai...43306​3&l=d81cf (external link)

I hope this forum will produce more feedback than the dedicated HDR one, as I'm curious as to what the posters here think.

This was the first time I went out to do anything with HDR. Unfortunately, the pictures are in alphabetical order, so you won't know which ones were shot or edited first. However, I liked the ones I edited last more than the first ones. I also used PS4, no dedicated HDR programs. Thank you.


Christian

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeuceDeuce
Goldmember
Avatar
2,362 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
     
Feb 22, 2009 11:25 |  #2

Very few of us have the time (or inclination) to critique 25 images. You said yourself you like the ones you processed later so why not pick the one (or two) you think is your absolute best work, and get a critique on those?


my website: Light & Shadow (external link)
my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CAL ­ Imagery
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,375 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2008
Location: O-H
     
Feb 22, 2009 14:50 |  #3

LeuceDeuce wrote in post #7380436 (external link)
Very few of us have the time (or inclination) to critique 25 images. You said yourself you like the ones you processed later so why not pick the one (or two) you think is your absolute best work, and get a critique on those?

Fair enough.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 400 | MIME changed to 'text/plain'

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 400 | MIME changed to 'text/plain'

Christian

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jgrussell
Looking around nervously
Avatar
18,758 posts
Likes: 14
Joined May 2008
Location: NJ USA
     
Feb 22, 2009 17:52 |  #4

The shots you picked don't seem to have the extreme dynamic range that makes HDR worthwhile. They're not bad, but I don't see how they're terribly improved using HDR.


-- jgr
blog (external link) | gear | my birds (external link)http://photos.jgrussel​l.com/gallery/7381653_​pK9fK (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Advisor
Member
Avatar
190 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: South Dakota
     
Feb 22, 2009 21:36 |  #5

jgrussell wrote in post #7382595 (external link)
The shots you picked don't seem to have the extreme dynamic range that makes HDR worthwhile. They're not bad, but I don't see how they're terribly improved using HDR.

I agree - there isn't much contrast or range of color with these...


Canon EOS 5D MII
400 5.6L [COLOR=black]- 17-40 f4.0 L - 100 2.8 macro - 50 1.4 - 580EXII - Battery Grip - Interfit Strobes - Manfrotto Tripod/Head
http://www.dpimagery.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lonelyjew
Goldmember
Avatar
1,411 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Mar 2008
     
Feb 22, 2009 22:03 |  #6

Advisor wrote in post #7384129 (external link)
I agree - there isn't much contrast or range of color with these...

+1

Also, I find the watermark to be very distracting. Are you trying to convey anything with these images, are you go for any sort of look other than just HDR?


Canon 40D
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8, Canon EF-S 55-250mm IS, ∑ 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC Macro, ∑ 105mm f/2.8 EX DC Macro
580ex II
An off brand tank of a tripod w/ Manfrotto 486RC2 Head

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CAL ­ Imagery
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,375 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2008
Location: O-H
     
Feb 23, 2009 10:10 |  #7

No, I just went for mild HDR look - I wanted to bring back tones to make the pictures more "natural" and not the overly done, anyone can tell the picture was heavy editing look of many HDRs here; I'm not really a huge fan, yet, of overly cooked HDRs. I went by the original intent of HDR, at least that was the plan...

Yes, the watermark are necessary because I wanted to upload them onto facebook. Sorry for their distraction, however.


Christian

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeuceDeuce
Goldmember
Avatar
2,362 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
     
Feb 23, 2009 11:40 as a reply to  @ CAL Imagery's post |  #8

As mentioned earlier I'm not sure that this scene even required HDR. The images presented are a tad flat as the majority of tone is bunched up in the middle rather than using the full available range. Colour balance is a guess, but it seems a little blue to me. Converging verticals need correcting. Posterization of the sky. While you may have tried to keep your HDR natural in appearance you have some pretty glaring halos between the buildings and sky, as well as in the shadow of the fence.

Here's my interpretation of the scene after making the corrections I noted:

Edit: more halo still in the actual fence links. You'd want to deal with that too.
_


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


my website: Light & Shadow (external link)
my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,240 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Moving my Ohio State HDR Thread Here...
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1401 guests, 178 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.