Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 22 Feb 2009 (Sunday) 10:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

tamrac expedition 5 vs 5x

 
Zeus87
Member
35 posts
Joined Apr 2007
     
Feb 22, 2009 10:51 |  #1

hello, im looking to purchase one of these bags, but would like to know the difference. I see the 5 doesnt have a laptop pouch, but what else? is it the same water resistant setup with the zippers,ect? place for a tripod? is it worth spending the extra for the 5x? thanks!


XTI.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Feb 22, 2009 11:52 |  #2

Zeus87 wrote in post #7380267 (external link)
hello, im looking to purchase one of these bags, but would like to know the difference. I see the 5 doesnt have a laptop pouch, but what else? is it the same water resistant setup with the zippers,ect? place for a tripod? is it worth spending the extra for the 5x? thanks!

As far as I can tell, there really isn't much difference between the 5 and the 5x other than the 5x being a newer model replacing the 5. On the inside, I did notice that the 5x has a new center dividers that allows you to hold a camera at the top and the bottom of the bag. With the 5, the camera (with a lens) sits at the top of the bag.

The 5x seems to have a square profile, I'm assuming to allow a laptop to fit in much better. The 5 has the same compartment but the top is more curved instead of squared because the compartment wasn't originally designed to fit a laptop in.

If you go to the Tamrac site and go to the Expedition 5x page, you see that they're using pictures of the 5 and the 5x bags. The 5x pictures will have a fold at the bottom of the center dividers while the 5 pictures do not. The 5x will also look squarish while the 5 has a more rounded top. Other than those two, I can't see any other differences between the two bags.

BTW, if it matters, I have the Expedition 5 and the Expedition 6x bags. :)


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zeus87
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
35 posts
Joined Apr 2007
     
Feb 22, 2009 15:52 |  #3

great thanks! So if i can snag the exp 5 new for $90 its a good deal?. Im moving to alaska for school and want to have a bag that i wont need to replace anytime soon, plus will handle a little change in weather. Thanks

Also: Is the bag suitable for a tripod? i have the bogen 3221, with ballhead. Thanks again!


XTI.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tvphotog
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,094 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 37
Joined Aug 2007
Location: New York City
     
Feb 22, 2009 16:42 |  #4

Zeus87 wrote in post #7381849 (external link)
great thanks! So if i can snag the exp 5 new for $90 its a good deal?. Im moving to alaska for school and want to have a bag that i wont need to replace anytime soon, plus will handle a little change in weather. Thanks

Also: Is the bag suitable for a tripod? i have the bogen 3221, with ballhead. Thanks again!

Very good price at $90, the 5X is about $140. But I don't know if the 5 has the three tripod straps on the back as does the 5x(see photos.) The tripod sits between the two back kidney-shaped pockets and two feet go into the bottom back pocket. I have the 5X and love it.

Photos courtesy www.tamrac.com (external link)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D IV | 5DS/R | Sony RX100 V | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Feb 22, 2009 17:47 |  #5

tvphotog wrote in post #7382159 (external link)
Very good price at $90, the 5X is about $140. But I don't know if the 5 has the three tripod straps on the back as does the 5x(see photos.) The tripod sits between the two back kidney-shaped pockets and two feet go into the bottom back pocket. I have the 5X and love it.

Photos courtesy www.tamrac.com (external link)

Yes, the 5 has the three straps plus the foot holder pouch just like the 5x.

Based on the picture of the 5x you posted, I really don't see any exterior difference between the 5 and the 5x. Even the shape, which I thought was kind of squarish on the 5x as it is on the 6x, looks the same.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tvphotog
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,094 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 37
Joined Aug 2007
Location: New York City
     
Feb 22, 2009 18:16 as a reply to  @ PacAce's post |  #6

Here's a pic of the Expedition 5 and areview. It looks the same as the 5X. I don't know what the advances could be, but for $90, if it's new, I'd grab it.

Photo courtesy Amazon


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D IV | 5DS/R | Sony RX100 V | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mufutau55
Goldmember
Avatar
1,278 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Bronx, New York City (USA)
     
Feb 23, 2009 10:53 |  #7

Can you please show us the inside/opened? Thanks.

Mufutau

tvphotog wrote in post #7382746 (external link)
Here's a pic of the Expedition 5 and areview. It looks the same as the 5X. I don't know what the advances could be, but for $90, if it's new, I'd grab it.

Photo courtesy Amazon




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tvphotog
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,094 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 37
Joined Aug 2007
Location: New York City
     
Feb 23, 2009 10:58 |  #8

mufutau55 wrote in post #7387640 (external link)
Can you please show us the inside/opened? Thanks.

Mufutau

It looks the same as the above 5X.


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D IV | 5DS/R | Sony RX100 V | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Feb 23, 2009 11:52 |  #9

tvphotog wrote in post #7387679 (external link)
It looks the same as the above 5X.

I thought the the 5x isb eing advertised to allow two cameras to be held in the bag with the lenses mounted. However, that picture of the 5x interior doesn't show such a divider. It looks exactly like that of the 5. If that's the case, then there must be absolutely no difference between the 5 and the 5x other than price.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mufutau55
Goldmember
Avatar
1,278 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Bronx, New York City (USA)
     
Feb 23, 2009 13:17 |  #10

Ok. Thanks.

Mufutau

tvphotog wrote in post #7387679 (external link)
It looks the same as the above 5X.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dmab
Goldmember
Avatar
1,260 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Wisconsin
     
Feb 25, 2009 11:14 |  #11

Does the 5 or 5X accommodate a 1D size body or XXD with grip?


Dan
=======
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OneMac
Member
Avatar
84 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Lossiemouth, Scotland
     
Feb 25, 2009 11:19 |  #12

Dmab wrote in post #7404061 (external link)
Does the 5 or 5X accommodate a 1D size body or XXD with grip?

Yes. I have a 40D + grip + RC2 plate and it's fine....

Al


Canon 7D & Grip,
Canon 100-400mm F4.5-5.6L
Canon 70-200mm F2.8 L Mk II,
Canon 400mm F5.6 L
Small stepladder :eyes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tvphotog
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,094 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 37
Joined Aug 2007
Location: New York City
     
Feb 25, 2009 11:41 |  #13

Dmab wrote in post #7404061 (external link)
Does the 5 or 5X accommodate a 1D size body or XXD with grip?

It's about six inches deep and will protect even a 1 series body with lens attached. It's a very well constructed workhorse bag with very dense padding inside and on the shoulder straps.


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D IV | 5DS/R | Sony RX100 V | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Feb 25, 2009 12:46 |  #14

Dmab wrote in post #7404061 (external link)
Does the 5 or 5X accommodate a 1D size body or XXD with grip?

A 1D camera, which is a little taller than an xxD camera with a grip, is taller than the inside depth of the Expedition 5 backpack so that will cause the part of the bag above the hotshoe of the camera to bulge out a little. But that won't prevent you from closing the zipper unless the laptop compartment has something rigid in it (like a laptop). If you're planning to carry a laptop in the backpack also, the 6x might be a better choice.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
breney
Senior Member
291 posts
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Ireland
     
Apr 22, 2012 03:46 |  #15

Going to try and revive this for people potentially buying the Expedition 5x now (3 years later)!

To any of you who have the 5x or 5, are you able to a fit a 15inch macbook(or similar laptop) into the bag?


Canon 40D gripped • Canon 300D Gripped • Tamron 17-50 f2.8 • Sigma 70-200 f2.8 • Canon 28-200 f3.5-5.6 · Canon 50mm f1.8 •

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,472 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
tamrac expedition 5 vs 5x
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1950 guests, 129 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.