Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 22 Feb 2009 (Sunday) 16:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

OMG 1Ds MK3 hit the concrete

 
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 552
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Feb 25, 2009 12:16 |  #196

I hope that this lady in the restaurant is not another Nikon jealousy photographer, so it was really a best opportunity for her to smack down the top expensive Canon DSLR, BY ACCIDENT, YAY.


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Synovia
Member
186 posts
Joined Feb 2009
     
Feb 25, 2009 12:19 |  #197

alt4852 wrote in post #7404093 (external link)
OP quote: "Apparently a lady was walking past his table and her handbag caught on the 1Ds MK3's neck-strap and accidently yanked it down."

i didn't know having something caught on a strap implied that the strap was hanging over the edge.

Exactly.


In my experience, women have almost no regard to where their purse is. Its the same with students and backpacks. If its behind you, it tends to be out of mind.

Now, we don't know exactly what happened, but in my oppinion, if you break someone's stuff, its your responsibility to fix it. Whether or not you intended to break it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
     
Feb 25, 2009 12:22 |  #198

Considering how much debate is going on about this incident... I can imagine a small claims court judge dismissing the case and telling the parties to go home.


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alt4852
Goldmember
Avatar
3,419 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
     
Feb 25, 2009 12:34 |  #199

AzzKicker wrote in post #7404316 (external link)
Well in cases like this you have use a BRAIN. For instance, if the strap was laying on table flat, the lady would have had to DRAG her purse across the actual table. Highly doubt that took place, considering the height of the average lady, and the way they walk carrying a purse. A neckstrap hanging over the table makes more sense and would explain how the BAG easily grabbed on to the strap pulling it down.

actually, no. by doubting that took place, you're making an assumption and therefore leaving the realm of the stated facts. neither one of us witnessed this, therefore we can't make assumptions like that especially since they are not implied by common sense. you don't know how tall she is, and i know plenty of women who carry large purses and tote bags who have little concern for where it swings. a large number of women carry purses which sit near their armpit yet we don't assume that she was three feet tall in order to snag a strap hanging off a table (which we also don't know the height of but certainly average around waist level for most people which can imply a larger bag that hangs that low.)

however, we're not here to play detective. we're working only on the facts from a witness of the event and by using our BRAINS we can safely agree that we can't assume anything. i also think it's funny that you assumed that the bag easily grabbed the strap and pulled it down. it couldn't have been a freak accident and occurred under the premise of uncommon circumstances?

the point i'm trying to make is that none of the consequential musings that we may have play any factor in the discussion at hand here. we're just having a conversation about liability and responsibility, not the estimated height of the lady, average hair color, or her grandmother's middle name.


5D4 | Z21 | 35L2 | 50L | 85L2 | 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alt4852
Goldmember
Avatar
3,419 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
     
Feb 25, 2009 12:36 |  #200

Synovia wrote in post #7404407 (external link)
Exactly.


In my experience, women have almost no regard to where their purse is. Its the same with students and backpacks. If its behind you, it tends to be out of mind.

Now, we don't know exactly what happened, but in my oppinion, if you break someone's stuff, its your responsibility to fix it. Whether or not you intended to break it.

this is the principle that i've been interested in discussing. everyone is up in arms against how horrible our society has become that we aim to sue each other, but isn't it more of a tragedy that people break things and take no initiative to offer some sort of recourse?


5D4 | Z21 | 35L2 | 50L | 85L2 | 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SF ­ Lights
Senior Member
682 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Northern California
     
Feb 25, 2009 12:38 |  #201
bannedPermanent ban

Well, sadly you have a good point there, but then you also have to consider that she may have had the fear of doing so because she knew that people can sue over the smallest things, just like everyone else knows. You're right, it's sad that our society doesn't offer help, but it seems like we're punished even when we do.


Deck One - Star Trek

www.deck-one.org (external link)
Proud owner of an XTi, and some lenses that will never satisfy me.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tim ­ S
Goldmember
Avatar
1,498 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 7
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
     
Feb 25, 2009 14:48 |  #202

neil_r wrote in post #7394418 (external link)
This is very much a sit down with popcorn and enjoy thread, but just so that there is at least one lesson learned here let me point out that Gears is not the plural of gear unless you are talking about toothed wheels that transfer drive.

The plural for gear in relation to equipment is gear.

:lol:

Great....now I've got butter all over the keyboard! ;)

xarqi wrote in post #7397677 (external link)
So, I did some research, and apparently this situation is covered by a legal ruling that dates back to Rome and is known as stercus accidit.

bw! That's funny right there. I don't care who you are, that's funny!


Tim
Equipment

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Feb 25, 2009 16:02 |  #203

ben805 wrote in post #7382053 (external link)
When accident like this happen, can you sue the person who damaged your gear or demand them to pay for the repair?

In small claims court you can sue anybody for anything, if judge judy is any example of what a court is.

And you can demand them to pay for repair as well.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jxg
Senior Member
400 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: RI
     
Feb 25, 2009 16:22 |  #204

FretNoMore wrote in post #7402832 (external link)
What has the value got to do with anything? How is it more OK to break someone's point-and-shoot and walk away without taking responsibility than if it is a high-cost dSLR?

Is it acceptable behaviour these days to push someone's camera to the ground and just say 'Oops' and walk away? ???

My point was that she probably didn't realize the value of the camera.

and who said she PUSHED the camera. For all she knew (or you for that matter), the camera could have gotten knocked off the table by someone else at the table while she was walking by...

I am not defending her in any way here, but I find it hard to believe that someone is going to go after someone else and win a claim for a camera that got knocked over in a public place.

the lesson learned here is that you need to have insurance. I have my gear insured for $3000 with no deductable for anything - theft, accidental dropage, someone with a purse walking by and being clueless, etc....


John

Gear List: More than I should have for a "hobby"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anders ­ Östberg
Goldmember
Avatar
3,395 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Sweden
     
Feb 25, 2009 16:27 |  #205

jxg wrote in post #7405923 (external link)
My point was that she probably didn't realize the value of the camera.

and who said she PUSHED the camera. For all she knew (or you for that matter), the camera could have gotten knocked off the table by someone else at the table while she was walking by...

I am not defending her in any way here, but I find it hard to believe that someone is going to go after someone else and win a claim for a camera that got knocked over in a public place.

the lesson learned here is that you need to have insurance. I have my gear insured for $3000 with no deductable for anything - theft, accidental dropage, someone with a purse walking by and being clueless, etc....

Sorry, but I feel the repairs should be paid by the clumsy person's insurance, not mine ...


Anders Östberg - Mostly Canon gear - My photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xarqi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,435 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand
     
Feb 25, 2009 16:32 |  #206

You know who the real culprit is here; the one who should be sued?
Isaac Newton.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robf
Senior Member
385 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: UK
     
Feb 25, 2009 17:14 |  #207

I think the resturant should be sued. The floor was obviously not made to take heavy expensive gear impacts well.

That's the problem, nobody thinks ahead these days. If it was 3ft deep in foam we wouldn't have had this thread.

Sheer irresponsibility... what is the world coming to?

Btw, just while we're on the subject, if I sneeze and blow the $100 of charlie piled next to me in the washroom into the lav, should that chap who owned it sue me?

Also, if a tree falls in a forest, but no-one sees or hears it, when did it fall?

And if a woodchuch could chuck wood, how far could it chuck it?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mickeyjuice
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,876 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Feb 25, 2009 17:16 |  #208
bannedPermanent ban

I think the bottom line is: How much protection should be afforded to idiots who a) don't look after their gear, and b) don't insure their gear?


cheers, juice (Canon shooter, Elinchrom lighter, but pretty much agnostic on brands.)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mellowd
Goldmember
Avatar
1,264 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: South African in London, UK
     
Feb 25, 2009 17:21 |  #209

miccullen wrote in post #7406244 (external link)
I think the bottom line is: How much protection should be afforded to idiots who a) don't look after their gear, and b) don't insure their gear?

+1 :lol:


5D : 17-40L : 85 f1.8 : 135L f2.0L - Full Gear List Here!
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eagle
Goldmember
Avatar
4,374 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Likes: 168
Joined May 2005
Location: Akron, Ohio
     
Feb 25, 2009 18:07 as a reply to  @ mellowd's post |  #210

SwingBopper wrote in post #7402958 (external link)
Best to forget the lady and see if the Restaurant has insurance for such things, and chalk it up to experience.

So now it's the restaurants fault? Why? :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

blonde wrote in post #7403684 (external link)
this is exactly what is wrong with the world, there is not more personal responsibility. omg, i was a moron and left my things all exposed and they are busted so instead of taking responsability,i am just going to sue somebody.

Agree totally

I think someone mentioned this already .............. why didn't the guy put his gear away when he was done shooting before going to the restaurant.
And didn't the woman say she was sorry like every is saying she didn't?

And quit comparing this incident to a auto accident. They are nowhere even close.

Lets see if I own a Rolex and go into a bathroom at a restaurant, take my watch off to wash my hands, some idiot washes his hands in the next sink, accidental knocks my watch off and breaks it ...............


7D MKII ■ 10-22 ■ 15-85 ■ 28-135 ■ Σ 50-150 ■ 70-200 f4L ■ 100-400L ■ 580EX II
Gear-PCSmugMug (external link) ShutterStock (external link) Alamy (external link) Eagle's Nest Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

26,162 views & 0 likes for this thread, 106 members have posted to it.
OMG 1Ds MK3 hit the concrete
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1663 guests, 132 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.