I hope that this lady in the restaurant is not another Nikon jealousy photographer, so it was really a best opportunity for her to smack down the top expensive Canon DSLR, BY ACCIDENT, YAY.
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer" More info | Feb 25, 2009 12:16 | #196 I hope that this lady in the restaurant is not another Nikon jealousy photographer, so it was really a best opportunity for her to smack down the top expensive Canon DSLR, BY ACCIDENT, YAY. Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Synovia Member 186 posts Joined Feb 2009 More info | Feb 25, 2009 12:19 | #197 alt4852 wrote in post #7404093 OP quote: "Apparently a lady was walking past his table and her handbag caught on the 1Ds MK3's neck-strap and accidently yanked it down." i didn't know having something caught on a strap implied that the strap was hanging over the edge. Exactly.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nathan Can you repeat the question, please? More info | Feb 25, 2009 12:22 | #198 Considering how much debate is going on about this incident... I can imagine a small claims court judge dismissing the case and telling the parties to go home. Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alt4852 Goldmember 3,419 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Northern Virginia More info | Feb 25, 2009 12:34 | #199 AzzKicker wrote in post #7404316 Well in cases like this you have use a BRAIN. For instance, if the strap was laying on table flat, the lady would have had to DRAG her purse across the actual table. Highly doubt that took place, considering the height of the average lady, and the way they walk carrying a purse. A neckstrap hanging over the table makes more sense and would explain how the BAG easily grabbed on to the strap pulling it down. actually, no. by doubting that took place, you're making an assumption and therefore leaving the realm of the stated facts. neither one of us witnessed this, therefore we can't make assumptions like that especially since they are not implied by common sense. you don't know how tall she is, and i know plenty of women who carry large purses and tote bags who have little concern for where it swings. a large number of women carry purses which sit near their armpit yet we don't assume that she was three feet tall in order to snag a strap hanging off a table (which we also don't know the height of but certainly average around waist level for most people which can imply a larger bag that hangs that low.) 5D4 | Z21 | 35L2 | 50L | 85L2 | 135L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alt4852 Goldmember 3,419 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Northern Virginia More info | Feb 25, 2009 12:36 | #200 Synovia wrote in post #7404407 Exactly. In my experience, women have almost no regard to where their purse is. Its the same with students and backpacks. If its behind you, it tends to be out of mind. Now, we don't know exactly what happened, but in my oppinion, if you break someone's stuff, its your responsibility to fix it. Whether or not you intended to break it. this is the principle that i've been interested in discussing. everyone is up in arms against how horrible our society has become that we aim to sue each other, but isn't it more of a tragedy that people break things and take no initiative to offer some sort of recourse? 5D4 | Z21 | 35L2 | 50L | 85L2 | 135L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SFLights Senior Member 682 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: Northern California More info | Feb 25, 2009 12:38 | #201 Permanent banWell, sadly you have a good point there, but then you also have to consider that she may have had the fear of doing so because she knew that people can sue over the smallest things, just like everyone else knows. You're right, it's sad that our society doesn't offer help, but it seems like we're punished even when we do. Deck One - Star Trek
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 25, 2009 14:48 | #202 neil_r wrote in post #7394418 This is very much a sit down with popcorn and enjoy thread, but just so that there is at least one lesson learned here let me point out that Gears is not the plural of gear unless you are talking about toothed wheels that transfer drive. The plural for gear in relation to equipment is gear.
xarqi wrote in post #7397677 So, I did some research, and apparently this situation is covered by a legal ruling that dates back to Rome and is known as stercus accidit.
Tim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DocFrankenstein Cream of the Crop 12,324 posts Likes: 13 Joined Apr 2004 Location: where the buffalo roam More info | Feb 25, 2009 16:02 | #203 ben805 wrote in post #7382053 When accident like this happen, can you sue the person who damaged your gear or demand them to pay for the repair? In small claims court you can sue anybody for anything, if judge judy is any example of what a court is. National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jxg Senior Member 400 posts Joined Oct 2008 Location: RI More info | Feb 25, 2009 16:22 | #204 FretNoMore wrote in post #7402832 What has the value got to do with anything? How is it more OK to break someone's point-and-shoot and walk away without taking responsibility than if it is a high-cost dSLR? Is it acceptable behaviour these days to push someone's camera to the ground and just say 'Oops' and walk away? ![]() My point was that she probably didn't realize the value of the camera. John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AndersÖstberg Goldmember 3,395 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2003 Location: Sweden More info | Feb 25, 2009 16:27 | #205 jxg wrote in post #7405923 My point was that she probably didn't realize the value of the camera. and who said she PUSHED the camera. For all she knew (or you for that matter), the camera could have gotten knocked off the table by someone else at the table while she was walking by... I am not defending her in any way here, but I find it hard to believe that someone is going to go after someone else and win a claim for a camera that got knocked over in a public place. the lesson learned here is that you need to have insurance. I have my gear insured for $3000 with no deductable for anything - theft, accidental dropage, someone with a purse walking by and being clueless, etc.... Sorry, but I feel the repairs should be paid by the clumsy person's insurance, not mine ... Anders Östberg - Mostly Canon gear - My photos
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xarqi Cream of the Crop 10,435 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand More info | Feb 25, 2009 16:32 | #206 You know who the real culprit is here; the one who should be sued?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Robf Senior Member 385 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: UK More info | Feb 25, 2009 17:14 | #207 I think the resturant should be sued. The floor was obviously not made to take heavy expensive gear impacts well.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mickeyjuice Cream of the Crop 7,876 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2003 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Feb 25, 2009 17:16 | #208 Permanent banI think the bottom line is: How much protection should be afforded to idiots who a) don't look after their gear, and b) don't insure their gear? cheers, juice (Canon shooter, Elinchrom lighter, but pretty much agnostic on brands.)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mellowd Goldmember 1,264 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: South African in London, UK More info | Feb 25, 2009 17:21 | #209 miccullen wrote in post #7406244 I think the bottom line is: How much protection should be afforded to idiots who a) don't look after their gear, and b) don't insure their gear? +1 5D : 17-40L : 85 f1.8 : 135L f2.0L - Full Gear List Here!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SwingBopper wrote in post #7402958 Best to forget the lady and see if the Restaurant has insurance for such things, and chalk it up to experience. So now it's the restaurants fault? Why? blonde wrote in post #7403684 this is exactly what is wrong with the world, there is not more personal responsibility. omg, i was a moron and left my things all exposed and they are busted so instead of taking responsability,i am just going to sue somebody. Agree totally 7D MKII ■ 10-22 ■ 15-85 ■ 28-135 ■ Σ 50-150 ■ 70-200 f4L ■ 100-400L ■ 580EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1663 guests, 132 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||