1) so are you implying that you think this situation should be resolved differently only on the basis of stated law?
2) ..and? they're both personal property.
3) why yes, when i am walking around, i usually make it a point to see where i am going and to assess my surroundings. this is why i say sorry if i bump into people on the metro, it's my fault for walking into stationary objects or people.
4) actually, per most state laws, as long as you run into a stationary or unattended vehicle, it is YOUR responsibility to leave contact information for the car owner. i can park my car some place it is not supposed to be parked but it is NOT MOVING and it is the responsibility of other drivers not to run into it. if a car is blocking a roadway, you are not free of liability if you use your car to nudge it out of the way. you call a towing company and you get that car impounded. if it is stationary, it is your responsibility if you collide with it. (it doesn't matter if i'm a foot out of my space and the rear of my car is widely sticking out of a spot, if someone hits it, they are supposed to leave a note.)
i just don't see a huge difference between these two accidental forms of destruction of property. one is just more common so it is protected by laws, the other is not.
Last point exactly. Your (4) addresses my point that a car is different than a camera. Statutory law delineates that owning and driving a car obligates you to certain responsibilities. (3) If you bump into someone accidentally and cause him to fall and break his arm, then his health insurance will pay him for injury. You could be nice and say sorry and offer to pay, but you're not obligated to. (2) Again, personal property but different obligations. (1) Statutory law establishes strict liability. There's case law and common law, too... but those are tested by going to court. If you go to court, then test out your theory that way. All I'm saying is that there's not enough to require this woman to pay for either damages or replacement.





