Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 24 Feb 2009 (Tuesday) 01:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Attempting Improvement

 
Rhilton4u
Goldmember
Avatar
1,503 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Lake Ridge, VA
     
Feb 24, 2009 01:18 |  #1

I'm not sure how this has progressed...I've tried some pp experimentation to try and liven up the poor lighting I experienced in this image...

Initial Process:

IMAGE: http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a299/Rhilton4u/CrisologoStreet_0086.jpg

Enhanced Saturation and Lighting:
IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3380/3299367175_794762c027_o.jpg

Using "ink lines" Artistic Photoshop Effect:
IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3618/3305105305_983d9934ed_o.jpg

Canon 1DX & 5D Classic | Manfrotto 3021 & 3249 Pods w/ 488RC2 | Speedlite 600EX-RT & 430EX
EF 17-40mm F4L | EF 24-70mm F2.8L | EF 70-200mm F2.8L (IS) | EF 100-400mm F4.5-5.6L (IS)
EF 100mm Macro F2.8L (IS) | MR-14EX II Macro Ring Lite | EF 50mm F1.8 ("nifty-fifty") | ► My flickr  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rhilton4u
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,503 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Lake Ridge, VA
     
Feb 24, 2009 01:21 |  #2

I also attempted some sepia tone and added noise to this one:

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3440/3299367527_2ea1a56145_o.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3326/3305926282_e263412561_o.jpg

Canon 1DX & 5D Classic | Manfrotto 3021 & 3249 Pods w/ 488RC2 | Speedlite 600EX-RT & 430EX
EF 17-40mm F4L | EF 24-70mm F2.8L | EF 70-200mm F2.8L (IS) | EF 100-400mm F4.5-5.6L (IS)
EF 100mm Macro F2.8L (IS) | MR-14EX II Macro Ring Lite | EF 50mm F1.8 ("nifty-fifty") | ► My flickr  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rhilton4u
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,503 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Lake Ridge, VA
     
Feb 24, 2009 11:50 as a reply to  @ Rhilton4u's post |  #3

Hoping for some advice...keep these unedited or are these an improvement?


Canon 1DX & 5D Classic | Manfrotto 3021 & 3249 Pods w/ 488RC2 | Speedlite 600EX-RT & 430EX
EF 17-40mm F4L | EF 24-70mm F2.8L | EF 70-200mm F2.8L (IS) | EF 100-400mm F4.5-5.6L (IS)
EF 100mm Macro F2.8L (IS) | MR-14EX II Macro Ring Lite | EF 50mm F1.8 ("nifty-fifty") | ► My flickr  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Laramie
Still livin' the cowboylife
Avatar
3,220 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Inland Empire, California
     
Feb 24, 2009 12:12 |  #4

The edited #2 and Sepia #5 looks really nice to me. I didn't much care for the ink lines effect, but that's just me.

The exposure adjustment and color you did to #2 looks great to me.


5DIII | 40D | 17-40 f4L | Tamron 28-75 2.8 | 50 1.4 | 70-200 2.8L | Oly Zuiko 50 macro | Tamron 1.4x

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonydee
Goldmember
Avatar
2,009 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Tokyo
     
Feb 24, 2009 12:31 |  #5

I think #2 went a too far in the right directions. Somehow, the people on the left came out looking wooden... only joking :-P. I prefer both the originals to any of the edits. With the sepia, the image looks too busy and harsh in monochrome.

Cheers, Tony


5D and too much glass. Mamiya 645E.
http://www.picasaweb.c​om/anthonypon (external link) recent work

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rhilton4u
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,503 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Lake Ridge, VA
     
Feb 24, 2009 12:41 as a reply to  @ tonydee's post |  #6

Thanks guys...appreciate your input.


Canon 1DX & 5D Classic | Manfrotto 3021 & 3249 Pods w/ 488RC2 | Speedlite 600EX-RT & 430EX
EF 17-40mm F4L | EF 24-70mm F2.8L | EF 70-200mm F2.8L (IS) | EF 100-400mm F4.5-5.6L (IS)
EF 100mm Macro F2.8L (IS) | MR-14EX II Macro Ring Lite | EF 50mm F1.8 ("nifty-fifty") | ► My flickr  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shooter_Mutter
Member
Avatar
149 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2009
     
Feb 24, 2009 13:47 |  #7

cowboylife wrote in post #7396616 (external link)
The edited #2 and Sepia #5 looks really nice to me. I didn't much care for the ink lines effect, but that's just me.

The exposure adjustment and color you did to #2 looks great to me.

I have to agree with cowboy.. I like the edited #2 and the sepia one :-)


*x* Desy *x*
Canon 450D (Death By Err 99) | Canon 60D | Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS |Canon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS | Canon 50mm f/1.8 II |Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS II | Bower SFD926C Flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rhilton4u
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,503 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Lake Ridge, VA
     
Feb 24, 2009 14:07 as a reply to  @ Shooter_Mutter's post |  #8

Thanks Shooter...if anyone has any alternate ideas on making these turn out better I'm all ears. Basically the situation I had was a morning shadow on the left side because the sun was obstructed by the buildings. Thanks.


Canon 1DX & 5D Classic | Manfrotto 3021 & 3249 Pods w/ 488RC2 | Speedlite 600EX-RT & 430EX
EF 17-40mm F4L | EF 24-70mm F2.8L | EF 70-200mm F2.8L (IS) | EF 100-400mm F4.5-5.6L (IS)
EF 100mm Macro F2.8L (IS) | MR-14EX II Macro Ring Lite | EF 50mm F1.8 ("nifty-fifty") | ► My flickr  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dpark
Senior Member
376 posts
Joined Dec 2008
     
Feb 24, 2009 17:51 |  #9

1. A nice shot.
2. Also nice. I can't decide if the edits went too far or not. Call it tied with #1.
3. I find this effect to be cheesy and honestly, kind of unpleasant to look at.
4. Okay, but a bit boring.
5. This picture is better than 4. The framing is much better. The cart in the corner adds interest, and the carriage on the street is much closer, so it becomes a point of interest as well. I think this shot in color would be very nice. The sepia and noise, for me, just detract. I might bring down the exposure a bit or play with the contrast, though. I feel that might bring out some of the detail. (I might play with the contrast on 1 and 2 as well.)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rhilton4u
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,503 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Lake Ridge, VA
     
Feb 24, 2009 19:16 |  #10

dpark wrote in post #7398889 (external link)
1. A nice shot.
2. Also nice. I can't decide if the edits went too far or not. Call it tied with #1.
3. I find this effect to be cheesy and honestly, kind of unpleasant to look at.
4. Okay, but a bit boring.
5. This picture is better than 4. The framing is much better. The cart in the corner adds interest, and the carriage on the street is much closer, so it becomes a point of interest as well. I think this shot in color would be very nice. The sepia and noise, for me, just detract. I might bring down the exposure a bit or play with the contrast, though. I feel that might bring out some of the detail. (I might play with the contrast on 1 and 2 as well.)

Thanks dpark...actually I only realized that #4 was different than 5 after I uploaded it, but I was just trying to show the colors & contrast before I attempted to improve so I just left it. I've already tried what you suggest - but the left side was brought out only when I added highlighted shadows and if I try to add more contrast it only darkens them back. Any attempt to get more color or contrast with the slider degrades the image to unacceptable levels.


Canon 1DX & 5D Classic | Manfrotto 3021 & 3249 Pods w/ 488RC2 | Speedlite 600EX-RT & 430EX
EF 17-40mm F4L | EF 24-70mm F2.8L | EF 70-200mm F2.8L (IS) | EF 100-400mm F4.5-5.6L (IS)
EF 100mm Macro F2.8L (IS) | MR-14EX II Macro Ring Lite | EF 50mm F1.8 ("nifty-fifty") | ► My flickr  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dpark
Senior Member
376 posts
Joined Dec 2008
     
Feb 24, 2009 21:53 |  #11

Rhilton4u wrote in post #7399459 (external link)
Thanks dpark...actually I only realized that #4 was different than 5 after I uploaded it, but I was just trying to show the colors & contrast before I attempted to improve so I just left it. I've already tried what you suggest - but the left side was brought out only when I added highlighted shadows and if I try to add more contrast it only darkens them back. Any attempt to get more color or contrast with the slider degrades the image to unacceptable levels.

I played with it and found that with the tone adjustment in DPP, I was able to get a little more contrast. It does lose some detail on both the highlights and the shadows, but I think it's a decent trade-off. When I look at the original picture, it almost has a gray cast to it. By giving up some of the detail in the potted plant, and in the cables on the underside of the balcony, you can get more contrast between the gate and the wall, and bring out more texture in the street. I also bumped the reds a teeny bit to add more warmth. It's not a huge change, but to my eyes it makes a big difference. I'd rather lose a bit on both sides of the dynamic range than push everything into the middle.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,172 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Attempting Improvement
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
653 guests, 118 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.