Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 21 Feb 2009 (Saturday) 02:11
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

General MF lens discussion

 
kitacanon
Goldmember
4,706 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2006
Location: West Palm Beach
     
Aug 01, 2010 14:02 |  #466

I recently picked up a Nikkor 85/1.8-H beater of a lens...but it takes fine pix...so if you see an oldie with dust and specks of ??? inside, don't immediately reject it...it might just be fine...

Here's what it looks like inside...(the outside isn't much better)...

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


Here's a quick test @ F4 full frame and 100% crops off my 40D (USM added on this gray day)
IMAGE: http://a.imageshack.us/img836/9467/tbshtffu24.jpg

IMAGE: http://a.imageshack.us/img153/2476/tbshtcu24.jpg

IMAGE: http://a.imageshack.us/img440/3986/tbshtccu24.jpg


IMAGE: http://a.imageshack.us/img841/4229/tbshtcccu24.jpg

and another 100% crop....the duck of course...(that's me reflected in its eye)
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

My Canon kit 450D/s90; Canon lenses 18-55 IS, 70-210/3.5-4.5....Nikon kit: D610; 28-105/3.5-4.5, 75-300/4.5-5.6 AF, 50/1.8D Nikkors, Tamron 80-210; MF Nikkors: 50/2K, 50/1.4 AI-S, 50/1.8 SeriesE, 60/2.8 Micro Nikkor (AF locked), 85mm/1.8K-AI, 105/2.5 AIS/P.C, 135/2.8K/Q.C, 180/2.8 ED, 200/4Q/AIS, 300/4.5H-AI, ++ Tamron 70-210/3.8-4, Vivitar/Kiron 28/2, ser.1 70-210/3.5, ser.1 28-90; Vivitar/Komine and Samyang 28/2.8; 35mm Nikon F/FM/FE2, Rebel 2K...HTC RE UWA camera

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MichaelBernard
Goldmember
Avatar
3,586 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Aug 07, 2010 10:22 |  #467
bannedPermanent ban

Hell if you don't want it I'll take it :)


http://www.Michael-Bernard.com (external link)"I think that there will be people disappointed in any camera short of the one that summons the ghost of Ansel Adams to come and press the shutter button for them." -lazer-jock

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kitacanon
Goldmember
4,706 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2006
Location: West Palm Beach
     
Aug 07, 2010 10:47 |  #468

MB...sorry but I think I'll keep it for now...(if I find a replacement, you know, pristine looking, I'll let you know)
...this lens seems to lock on the point of focus (or I'm easily spotting it) more easily than most MF lenses I've used so I can recommend it to anyone looking for this FL...

IMAGE: http://a.imageshack.us/img837/3797/img9173mss.jpg

My Canon kit 450D/s90; Canon lenses 18-55 IS, 70-210/3.5-4.5....Nikon kit: D610; 28-105/3.5-4.5, 75-300/4.5-5.6 AF, 50/1.8D Nikkors, Tamron 80-210; MF Nikkors: 50/2K, 50/1.4 AI-S, 50/1.8 SeriesE, 60/2.8 Micro Nikkor (AF locked), 85mm/1.8K-AI, 105/2.5 AIS/P.C, 135/2.8K/Q.C, 180/2.8 ED, 200/4Q/AIS, 300/4.5H-AI, ++ Tamron 70-210/3.8-4, Vivitar/Kiron 28/2, ser.1 70-210/3.5, ser.1 28-90; Vivitar/Komine and Samyang 28/2.8; 35mm Nikon F/FM/FE2, Rebel 2K...HTC RE UWA camera

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MichaelBernard
Goldmember
Avatar
3,586 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Aug 08, 2010 17:42 |  #469
bannedPermanent ban

my pentax 55 is that way. It's either in focus 100% or it's not. Makes it really easy to MF, but I am still getting a split focus viewfinder.


http://www.Michael-Bernard.com (external link)"I think that there will be people disappointed in any camera short of the one that summons the ghost of Ansel Adams to come and press the shutter button for them." -lazer-jock

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FreezeTheMoment
Goldmember
Avatar
2,057 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 37
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Ohio
     
Sep 02, 2010 19:22 |  #470

I recently got a Carl Zeiss Tessar 80/2.8. Since it is old and stiff, I unscrewed a few screws and tried to see what's inside. After I put the parts back, somehow it seems that the focus is not right. When I see from viewfinder that it's in focus, the real focus in the picture turns out to be a bit farther or closer. I'm not sure if this is only because I'm not good at manual focus or I did something wrong in the assembling. Actually now I notice that there are several ways to fix two certain screws. Maybe I got the wrong one? Is there any suggestion?



Gear list
A hobbyist here. I like taking pictures of people.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rossbeckernz
Member
Avatar
41 posts
Joined May 2010
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Sep 02, 2010 19:45 |  #471

About 3 months ago I bought an FD50 f1.2L & an FD85 f1.2L on Ebay. Both in absolute mint condition. I removed the FD mounts & replaced them with EF mounts with chips that tell the camera the FL of the lens, max aperture, micro-focus adjustment & focus confirm. I use them on my 1D4 & the image quality is superb. I bought the Ec-S focusing screen which is better for manual focus.
You can see some photos of the conversion process here:
for the 50L http://****/abKh5N (external link)
for the 85L http://****/c0vE6W (external link)


Ross Becker,
New Zealand
Holiday photos here:http://bit.ly/IdOb7 (external link)
Library photos here:http://bit.ly/L1gPW (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ballen ­ Photo
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,716 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 920
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Southern Nevada and Idaho
     
Sep 02, 2010 22:30 |  #472

colormaniac wrote in post #10839736 (external link)
I recently got a Carl Zeiss Tessar 80/2.8. Since it is old and stiff, I unscrewed a few screws and tried to see what's inside. After I put the parts back, somehow it seems that the focus is not right. When I see from viewfinder that it's in focus, the real focus in the picture turns out to be a bit farther or closer. I'm not sure if this is only because I'm not good at manual focus or I did something wrong in the assembling. Actually now I notice that there are several ways to fix two certain screws. Maybe I got the wrong one? Is there any suggestion?

Have a look here. http://oomz.net/tessar​/ (external link) The reference you want to read is about adjusting focus at both ends, is towards the end of this article.
I know this is for a 50mm, and you have an 80mm, but I'm betting they will be similar in build. I hope you can find something there to help.
-Bruce


The Captain and crew finally got their stuff together, now if we can only remember where we left it. :cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cptrios
Goldmember
Avatar
1,745 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Boston, USA / Burgundy, France
     
Sep 02, 2010 23:26 |  #473

rossbeckernz wrote in post #10839829 (external link)
About 3 months ago I bought an FD50 f1.2L & an FD85 f1.2L on Ebay. Both in absolute mint condition. I removed the FD mounts & replaced them with EF mounts with chips that tell the camera the FL of the lens, max aperture, micro-focus adjustment & focus confirm. I use them on my 1D4 & the image quality is superb. I bought the Ec-S focusing screen which is better for manual focus.
You can see some photos of the conversion process here:
for the 50L http://****/abKh5N (external link)
for the 85L http://****/c0vE6W (external link)

I didn't think you could convert FD lenses to EF cameras without a glass adapter...awesome!


Fuji X100 / Sony NEX-7 / Contax G 45mm f/2 / The ghosts of 3 Canon bodies past / A meagre amount of talent
My weak lil' 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Sep 03, 2010 08:03 |  #474

Do they focus to inifnity ?


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FreezeTheMoment
Goldmember
Avatar
2,057 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 37
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Ohio
     
Sep 03, 2010 08:18 |  #475

I have another question. I've tried two EXA adatpers and one M42. All of them, as well as any other you find on eBay, claim to be able to focus to infinity. But they do not actually. Is there something I missed?



Gear list
A hobbyist here. I like taking pictures of people.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FreezeTheMoment
Goldmember
Avatar
2,057 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 37
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Ohio
     
Sep 03, 2010 08:23 |  #476

Ballen Photo wrote in post #10840737 (external link)
Have a look here. http://oomz.net/tessar​/ (external link) The reference you want to read is about adjusting focus at both ends, is towards the end of this article.
I know this is for a 50mm, and you have an 80mm, but I'm betting they will be similar in build. I hope you can find something there to help.
-Bruce

Thanks, Bruce! I'll look at that.



Gear list
A hobbyist here. I like taking pictures of people.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cptrios
Goldmember
Avatar
1,745 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Boston, USA / Burgundy, France
     
Sep 03, 2010 09:15 |  #477

colormaniac wrote in post #10842807 (external link)
I have another question. I've tried two EXA adatpers and one M42. All of them, as well as any other you find on eBay, claim to be able to focus to infinity. But they do not actually. Is there something I missed?

That's funky...I've used a few M42 adapters and never had a problem (until I went to a FF camera and the wider lenses started hitting the mirror). Which m42 lenses are you using?


Fuji X100 / Sony NEX-7 / Contax G 45mm f/2 / The ghosts of 3 Canon bodies past / A meagre amount of talent
My weak lil' 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hpulley
Goldmember
4,390 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Sep 03, 2010 09:28 |  #478

bohdank wrote in post #10842727 (external link)
Do they focus to inifnity ?

If you remove the FD mount then yes, they can focus to infinity. You can't do this with retrofocus wide angle lenses that have protruding rear elements which may not clear the mirror of full frame bodies and even the 55mm f/1.2 can have a problem but most normal and telephoto lenses work fine.

The usual problem is with adapters since it adds to the needed backfocus distance when you need to shorten it instead for EF.


flickr (external link) 1DIIN 40D 1NRS 650 1.4xII EF12II Pel8 50f1.8I 28-80II 17-40L 24-70L 100-400L 177A 199A OC-E3 RS-80N3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FreezeTheMoment
Goldmember
Avatar
2,057 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 37
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Ohio
     
Sep 03, 2010 10:34 |  #479

cptrios wrote in post #10843030 (external link)
That's funky...I've used a few M42 adapters and never had a problem (until I went to a FF camera and the wider lenses started hitting the mirror). Which m42 lenses are you using?

I use an M42 adapter on Helios 44-M, an EXA adapter on Carl Zeiss Tessar 80/2.8, and another EXA adapter on Pentacon 135/2.8. None of them can focus to infinity. When in the viewfinder I saw that it's clear, the pictures turned out to be blurry.

Oh, is it because they all have AF-confirm feature?



Gear list
A hobbyist here. I like taking pictures of people.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hpulley
Goldmember
4,390 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Sep 03, 2010 12:06 |  #480

My M42 adapter also focuses fine to infinity. There should be lots of room.


flickr (external link) 1DIIN 40D 1NRS 650 1.4xII EF12II Pel8 50f1.8I 28-80II 17-40L 24-70L 100-400L 177A 199A OC-E3 RS-80N3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

109,483 views & 0 likes for this thread, 120 members have posted to it and it is followed by 9 members.
General MF lens discussion
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1677 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.