crazeazn Senior Member  398 posts Joined May 2010 Location: Houston More info | Nov 15, 2011 02:51 | #736 guyzer09 wrote in post #13401524  I been thinking about the EE-S screen cause I just hate having to focus then re compose. With the rokker x its gonna be extremely hard to hit focus at 1.2 its very very difficult to do so. John H.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
imperian Member 196 posts Joined Nov 2010 Location: Malaysia More info | Nov 24, 2011 07:40 | #737 I M now in dilemma of considering either contax 85 f1.4 or summicron 90mm. Both has very special character...... guys, any recommendation? 5D Classic | 17-40L | 50L | Nikkor 28/2 Ai
LOG IN TO REPLY |
argyle Cream of the Crop  8,187 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2007 Location: DFW, Texas More info | Nov 24, 2011 10:42 | #738 guyzer09 wrote in post #13401524 I been thinking about the EE-S screen cause I just hate having to focus then re compose. With the rokker x its gonna be extremely hard to hit focus at 1.2 And if that doesn't work, you may need to shim your Ee-S focusing screen. Had to do it to mine when I had my 5D...couldn't get a sharp image wide open, either with the 58/1.2 Rokkor or 50/1.4 Takumar...looked sharp in the VF, just not sharp once downloaded. Canon sells shims (focus screen washers, in their terminology) for just this purpose. Took a bit of trial and error, but once I had the proper shim in place the missed focuses when wide open went away completely. "Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mqqse Member  153 posts Likes: 7 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Washington, MO More info Post edited over 7 years ago by mqqse. | Aug 11, 2016 03:26 | #739 I'm trying to determine why the aperture ring doesn't work on this CPC 135mm 2.8  Image hosted by forum (807659) © mqqse [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.  Image hosted by forum (807660) © mqqse [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mqqse Member 153 posts Likes: 7 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Washington, MO More info | Aug 28, 2016 11:37 | #740 Anyone have experience with 200mm f4.5? I saw one the other day but didn't buy it. I can find info on the f2.8 version, but not the 4.5
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is bzguy 1497 guests, 190 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
