Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 04 Apr 2005 (Monday) 07:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

300mm f2.8 IS, Polariser Question

 
GenEOS
Senior Member
740 posts
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Pearland, Texas
     
Apr 04, 2005 07:42 |  #1

Will the old drop in polarizer filter (PL-C) for the non-IS 300 work in the newer IS version when used with a Mark II body (1.3x crop).
I understand the newer polarizer for the IS version is larger.
I have used the old polarizer on a new IS 300 with the D60 and not seen a problem.
I was wondering if it will be a problem with the Mark II or just with full frame sensors.


Daniel Tunstall
http://www.dmtphoto.co​m (external link)
Sports Shooter Member
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/members.html?id​=2474 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GenEOS
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
740 posts
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Pearland, Texas
     
Apr 04, 2005 08:59 |  #2

Cyber, Pekka...anyone....help me out!!


Daniel Tunstall
http://www.dmtphoto.co​m (external link)
Sports Shooter Member
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/members.html?id​=2474 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Belmondo
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
42,735 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Jul 2003
Location: 92210
     
Apr 04, 2005 09:16 as a reply to  @ GenEOS's post |  #3

GenEOS:

I don't know the answer, but by reading the description of the new CP drop-in filter, it doesn't sound promising:

This 52mm drop-in circular polarizing filter is specifically for the following IS (Image Stabilizer) Super Telephoto Lens Series: EF 300/2.8L IS USM, EF 400/2.8L IS USM, EF 500/4L IS USM and EF 600/4L IS USM. It can be rotated from the outside without removing it from the lens for precise control.

I have the filter, but don't have a non-IS lens to try it with. I do know that the drop-in filters for FD lenses were 48mm, so possibly they were the same with the non-IS EF lenses, too.

Don't know. Hopefully somebody that does will see this and give you the answer.

Sorry.


I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pekka
El General Moderator
Avatar
18,386 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 2472
Joined Mar 2001
Location: Hellsinki, Finland
     
Apr 04, 2005 10:56 |  #4

48mm filter does (should) not fit to IS lenses. You need 52mm.
I do not think the reasons are in digital camera crop factor.

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …ails&Q=&sku=186​093&is=REG (external link)


The Forum Boss, El General Moderator
AMASS 2.5 Changelog (installed here now)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Apr 04, 2005 11:09 |  #5

I think he was hoping that with the smaller image format the 48 mm filter wouldn't vignette the 300 on the 1D II. Whether it would would depend on two things:
1) Does the 48 mm C-POL holder still center on the 300 IS?
2) Where in the light path is the filter located (if it's internal, where the various lens elements are expecting a 52 mm diameter free light path, it might act as an additional diaphragm, further reducing light; if it's outside the lens' optical path, is it far enough outside that that a 48 mm diameter opening can pass the resolved image)?


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GenEOS
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
740 posts
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Pearland, Texas
     
Apr 04, 2005 11:15 |  #6

Pekka, I shot this combo with a D60 and it worked fine, I did not notice a problem. I only recently thought it may be a problem, because a friend has upgraded from non-IS to IS big primes. On his 400 and 600 the old PL-C fits, but blocks a portion of the lens on his film bodies, like a vignette of sort. Since the D60 has a much smaller sensor than a full frame, I used it without problem. Now I am wondering if the Mark II's larger sensor will "see" the edge of the smaller filter or not. I know the fix is to buy the new one. But, if this works beause of the size of the camera sensor, I can save some bucks...like 75 of them, by buying a used filter. I was hoping someone here may have tried this already.... I am needing this for knocking the glare off of windshields in mid-day sun at an upcomming race, it worked like a charm last year with the D60.


Daniel Tunstall
http://www.dmtphoto.co​m (external link)
Sports Shooter Member
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/members.html?id​=2474 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GenEOS
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
740 posts
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Pearland, Texas
     
Apr 04, 2005 22:17 |  #7

I tested this tonight with the older drop in polarizer. Strangely, it is the same size glass as the one that came with the lens. It works fine. No problem with blockage, fit etc.


Daniel Tunstall
http://www.dmtphoto.co​m (external link)
Sports Shooter Member
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/members.html?id​=2474 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Apr 04, 2005 22:37 |  #8

Was the old drop in for the non IS 300mm 48mm? I thought it was 52mm as well.. and thus there would be no problem at all?


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,193 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
300mm f2.8 IS, Polariser Question
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1682 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.