I took these landscapes (?) on a recent holiday and I have a mind to enlarge one of them. Before I do, though, could I have some honest C&C on them. Which one do you prefer? Is either actually worthy of enlargement?
RoyMathers I am Spartacus! 43,847 posts Likes: 2908 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom More info | Mar 11, 2009 09:44 | #1 I took these landscapes (?) on a recent holiday and I have a mind to enlarge one of them. Before I do, though, could I have some honest C&C on them. Which one do you prefer? Is either actually worthy of enlargement?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Stirfried Member 122 posts Joined Feb 2009 Location: Suzhou, China More info | Mar 11, 2009 12:01 | #2 I like #1... I'd straighten it and crop out more of the sky, and I think its too hot - see the sky, the guy in white and the road. The colours also seem a little saturated, but that might be just me. You could also try playing with the balance by cropping out either the far left or the right (that small shed) - or not - its a matter of personal feeling. 5DmkII, 400D, 24-105mm f/4L IS, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 135mm f/2L, 35mm f/1.4L, Sigma 150mm f/2.8 macro, 85mm f/1.8, 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 10-20mm f/4.0, Tamron 18-250mm f/3.5.... Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyMathers THREAD STARTER I am Spartacus! 43,847 posts Likes: 2908 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom More info | Mar 11, 2009 12:25 | #3 Thanks Stirfried - I'll do a little work on No 1 along the lines you suggested and re-post it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyMathers THREAD STARTER I am Spartacus! 43,847 posts Likes: 2908 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom More info | Mar 11, 2009 12:53 | #4 |
Stirfried Member 122 posts Joined Feb 2009 Location: Suzhou, China More info | Mar 11, 2009 13:14 | #5 To my eyes, yup - that's looking pretty good. But what do you think? 5DmkII, 400D, 24-105mm f/4L IS, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 135mm f/2L, 35mm f/1.4L, Sigma 150mm f/2.8 macro, 85mm f/1.8, 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 10-20mm f/4.0, Tamron 18-250mm f/3.5.... Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyMathers THREAD STARTER I am Spartacus! 43,847 posts Likes: 2908 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom More info | Mar 11, 2009 13:41 | #6 Yes, I think you were right. I think it looks better.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drprince89 Member 35 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Tampa, Fl More info | Mar 11, 2009 21:25 | #7 I also think the second attempt looks better
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Stirfried Member 122 posts Joined Feb 2009 Location: Suzhou, China More info | Mar 11, 2009 21:47 | #8 I still think it needs to rotate about 0.5 degrees anticlockwise (if it doesn't mess with the sharpness too much). 5DmkII, 400D, 24-105mm f/4L IS, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 135mm f/2L, 35mm f/1.4L, Sigma 150mm f/2.8 macro, 85mm f/1.8, 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 10-20mm f/4.0, Tamron 18-250mm f/3.5.... Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
poppieguy I'm Sid. Don't be hatin' my hats. 13,870 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: Oregon More info | Mar 11, 2009 21:54 | #9 I would print the first one, it's interesting and you can tell the story of it to your guests.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyMathers THREAD STARTER I am Spartacus! 43,847 posts Likes: 2908 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom More info | Mar 12, 2009 05:16 | #10 Thanks folks. Stirfried - why should tilting it another .5 degrees 'mess with the sharpness'?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Stirfried Member 122 posts Joined Feb 2009 Location: Suzhou, China More info | Mar 12, 2009 08:51 | #11 Roy Mathers wrote in post #7507644 Thanks folks. Stirfried - why should tilting it another .5 degrees 'mess with the sharpness'? Hi Roy - you didn't mention the camera you used (i.e. which pixel resolution) but if you take one of these web images and rotate it 0.5 degrees you'll get some nasty aliasing effects, due to taking the grid of the image pixels and the grid of the screen pixels and twisting between them. This shouldn't be a problem with a full RAW image, but a medium-resolution jpg might suffer. 5DmkII, 400D, 24-105mm f/4L IS, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 135mm f/2L, 35mm f/1.4L, Sigma 150mm f/2.8 macro, 85mm f/1.8, 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 10-20mm f/4.0, Tamron 18-250mm f/3.5.... Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyMathers THREAD STARTER I am Spartacus! 43,847 posts Likes: 2908 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom More info | Mar 12, 2009 09:13 | #12 |
Stirfried Member 122 posts Joined Feb 2009 Location: Suzhou, China More info | Mar 12, 2009 12:38 | #13 Looking good! 5DmkII, 400D, 24-105mm f/4L IS, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 135mm f/2L, 35mm f/1.4L, Sigma 150mm f/2.8 macro, 85mm f/1.8, 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 10-20mm f/4.0, Tamron 18-250mm f/3.5.... Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
scrumpy Goldmember 3,664 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Dorset, England More info | Mar 12, 2009 14:48 | #14 Roy, you need to darken the skies. Here's a good how-to video. Give it a try before you finally decide. David: Canon EOS 400D - Canon EF70-300mm f/4-55.6 IS USM -Sigma 17-70 F2.8-4.5 DC Macro - Sigma 50-500 'Bigma' - Speedlite 580EX 11 - Better Beamer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KimH Member 49 posts Joined Mar 2009 More info | Mar 12, 2009 14:52 | #15 I like the leading lines in number one. Where was it taken?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1606 guests, 141 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||