Why does this lens sell for so little? I just saw one sold for 85 dollars. Is it a poor lens? I have seen some pictures taken with it that looked really good to me.. (novice)
Don't understand.
Tom
yellowflagiris Member 96 posts Likes: 8 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Seattle USA More info | Mar 11, 2009 20:29 | #1 Why does this lens sell for so little? I just saw one sold for 85 dollars. Is it a poor lens? I have seen some pictures taken with it that looked really good to me.. (novice)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Mar 11, 2009 20:33 | #2 Yes it is one of the poorer performing lenses. I don't know if I would call it "poor" but compared to others it is not as good. There are also a lot of them on the market and demand is not too great, so that plays a role. Around Christmas, Canon was giving them away for nearly free with instant rebates on some cameras. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid More info | Mar 11, 2009 22:30 | #3 just to point out...it's most likely the canon 75-300mm...not the 70-300mm...they are two different lenses...one sells for $150, the other for about $550...apparently the lack of a 5 is worth an extra 400 bucks...and also everything else on it is better too Andre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 1142 guests, 166 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||