Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 13 Mar 2009 (Friday) 07:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How do you visualise without a camera?

 
neilwood32
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,231 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Sitting atop the castle, Edinburgh, Scotland
     
Mar 13, 2009 07:23 |  #1

Just wondering how people visualise whether a scene would look good as a photo when they dont have a camera handy?

Do you just look at the whole scene and hope there is a good photo in there or do you somehow try to focus on a smaller area to "see" the shot?

My tendency is to look at the whole and hope.:rolleyes:


Having a camera makes you no more a photographer than having a hammer and some nails makes you a carpenter - Claude Adams
Keep calm and carry a camera!
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Mar 13, 2009 07:25 |  #2

I can tell a good scene even when I'm cruising by it on the highway...I don't need a camera in my hands. I'm no savant either.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete
I was "Prime Mover" many years back....
Avatar
38,631 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Berkshire, UK
     
Mar 13, 2009 07:25 |  #3

It comes with experience.

Also, if you hold up your hands so that a rectangle is created by both thumbs and forefingers, you can effectively put a "frame" around the screen.


Pete
UK SE Catch of the Day

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neilwood32
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,231 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Sitting atop the castle, Edinburgh, Scotland
     
Mar 13, 2009 07:37 |  #4

Pete wrote in post #7514963 (external link)
It comes with experience.

Also, if you hold up your hands so that a rectangle is created by both thumbs and forefingers, you can effectively put a "frame" around the screen.

I was going to say that i did that but i thought that it was just me that did it:o


Having a camera makes you no more a photographer than having a hammer and some nails makes you a carpenter - Claude Adams
Keep calm and carry a camera!
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,725 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Maryland
     
Mar 13, 2009 08:21 |  #5

One way I learned when I was starting. We took an empty slide holder and an piece of cardboard. cut a hole in the card and put in the slide carrier. This way the hole is exactly the format that you will be taking. (and replaceable when damaged) When scouting you would hold it up and you could see what the picture might look like if you took the image. You could "zoom" it by holding it close or at an arms length.It basically made you to narrow your vision to a tiny part of the scene. After a while you start to exclude things from your vision as you look at things. In other words, you can see the water tower, but can keep it from influencing what you are focusing on as a potential image.

We made another with a gell in the holder. I forget what gell it is, but it would help you see in B&W. I still have this one somewhere.


www.darkslisemag.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Mar 13, 2009 08:44 |  #6

Pete wrote in post #7514963 (external link)
It comes with experience.

Also, if you hold up your hands so that a rectangle is created by both thumbs and forefingers, you can effectively put a "frame" around the screen.

My right thumb is too short for the 2:3 aspect ratio. What should I do?


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ook
Senior Member
Avatar
648 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Mar 13, 2009 08:56 |  #7

tzalman wrote in post #7515252 (external link)
My right thumb is too short for the 2:3 aspect ratio. What should I do?

Slide your thumbs closer to each other along your index fingers (the index fingers will protrude on either side), or shoot panorama :p


John-Allan
40D | 11-16mm f/2.8 | 17-55mm f/2.8 IS | 100mm f/2.8 macro | 430ex | A650IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete
I was "Prime Mover" many years back....
Avatar
38,631 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Berkshire, UK
     
Mar 13, 2009 08:58 |  #8

tzalman wrote in post #7515252 (external link)
My right thumb is too short for the 2:3 aspect ratio. What should I do?

Use an APS camera in panorama mode... :p


Pete
UK SE Catch of the Day

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Mar 13, 2009 10:40 |  #9

I can usually see what will make a good shot, but it's really only part of the process.
Creativity, nature/nurture Two pages of posts on the subject.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ralff
Senior Member
766 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Asheville NC
     
Mar 13, 2009 18:23 |  #10

Mark1 wrote in post #7515141 (external link)
One way I learned when I was starting. We took an empty slide holder and an piece of cardboard. cut a hole in the card and put in the slide carrier. This way the hole is exactly the format that you will be taking. (and replaceable when damaged) When scouting you would hold it up and you could see what the picture might look like if you took the image. You could "zoom" it by holding it close or at an arms length.It basically made you to narrow your vision to a tiny part of the scene. After a while you start to exclude things from your vision as you look at things. In other words, you can see the water tower, but can keep it from influencing what you are focusing on as a potential image.

We made another with a gell in the holder. I forget what gell it is, but it would help you see in B&W. I still have this one somewhere.

This is what was suggested by several Teachers I have had in different photography classes, take a piece of matt board/cardboard and cut out a small rectangle to match the format of your camera. Keep it in your wallet.


Canon 6D - Canon 7D - gripped, Canon 50D - gripped, EFS10-22mm, 17-40 f4 L, nifty-fifty, EF 28-135mm IS, 100-400 f4.5-5.6 L IS USM, Tokina AT-X 100mm f/2.8 ProD Macro, Benbo Trekker, Feisol 3371 w/ Kirk BH-3 ball head - Epson Pic-Mate, Epson 2200, Epson 3880 :D http://www.flickr.com/​photos/WNC_Ralph (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LV ­ Moose
Moose gets blamed for everything.
Avatar
23,434 posts
Gallery: 223 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 4798
Joined Dec 2008
     
Mar 13, 2009 21:42 |  #11

I don't usually try to "frame" the entire scene, I look at individual objects and try to analyze whether or not the light/shadows/colors/a​ngle etc., would result in a good image.

I was at Nellis Air Force Base today (just to shop), and watched for a while as various fighters shot their approaches. I noticed that as I watched, I was trying to figure where I would have to be to get the best sun, at what point in their banking it might be best to shoot, and so on. I do that stuff all the time without realizing it, until I catch myself.


Moose

Gear... Flickr (external link)...Flickr 2 (external link)...
Macro (external link)...Hummingbirds (external link)
Aircraft (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,725 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Maryland
     
Mar 13, 2009 21:59 |  #12

Moose that is exactley where you need to be. Constantly searching for "a frame" I do it as well. Even just driving down the road I will be framing how a tree leans over the road or what ever I see. This is what you want your brain to be doing. So when you are actually on location your brain is working on this with out thinking about it.


www.darkslisemag.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Naturalist
Adrift on a lonely vast sea
5,769 posts
Likes: 1251
Joined May 2007
     
Mar 13, 2009 22:06 |  #13

Years ago I used an empty 35mm slide mount to help visualize.
Today I can easily do that without the mount.

You have to also consider the effect of various lenses, DoF, etc. along with the framing of your visualization.



5D Mk IV & 7D Mk II
EF 16-35 f/4L EF 50 f/1.8 (Original) EF 24-105 f/4L EF 100 f/2.8L Macro EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L[/FONT]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Mar 14, 2009 04:14 |  #14

When I got my 10-22 one of the surprises I had was how I found it almost impossible to visualise what a scene would look like. I had to wander around with the viewfinder constantly at my eye. With experience it's becoming easier - but I still find it difficult.


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
YORCHI
Member
Avatar
200 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Mar 14, 2009 04:22 |  #15

thanks for sharing these tips...I feel this is my weakest point and something I need to learn to do better so I can stop taking "snapshots"


http://www.yorchi.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,251 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
How do you visualise without a camera?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1458 guests, 129 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.