Dragged my behind out of the house for a few pics, it's been awhile. 
C&C please!
 | HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |
fortisi876 Senior Member 493 posts Likes: 4 Joined Dec 2006 Location: NNJ More info | Mar 13, 2009 20:37 | #1 Dragged my behind out of the house for a few pics, it's been awhile.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
equetefue Goldmember  More info | Mar 13, 2009 20:53 | #2 breathtaking... lovely... how much PP ? http://www.Photo-Galleria.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
socalrailfan Goldmember  1,475 posts Likes: 45 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Riverside, CA More info | Mar 13, 2009 20:58 | #3 10stop ND, wow, didn't know they exist! Great shot! Dave - Riverside, CA PhotographersNature.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
L.Morey Goldmember  1,571 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Modesto Ca More info | Mar 13, 2009 21:06 | #4 Very good worth getting up for 7d gripped,40d gripped,G9,17-40f4L, 24-70f2.8 L, 70-200f2.8 mkll L, 100-400 f4.5-5.6 L, 50f1.4 , 85f1.8 , Sigma 24-70f2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 13, 2009 21:08 | #5 PP= some cloning (the dock had two long poles that had to go), a lil bit of NR in the sky/water and a lil bit of saturation.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink  69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Mar 13, 2009 21:12 | #6 Nice work fortisi. I also own this filter but, I still haven't had the chance to use it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MichaelBottoms Cream of the Crop 6,297 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Whitby Ontario... just outside of Toronto More info | Mar 13, 2009 21:52 | #7 Nice capture... just wondering... 186 s exposure--couldn't you use a lesser nd filter and a shorter exposure? I investigated the B &W filters, and didn't you have to combine two to get the 10stop down? Former Pentax & 20D owner... now the pleased owner of the new 50D, 580EX, Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, Canon EF-S 60mm Macro, Canon EFS 17-85mm F/4-5.6 IS USM, Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 IS USM, Kenko 1.4X Teleplus Pro 300, Sekonic L-508 Zoom Master Meter, Manfrotto and slik tripods, trekpod and other assorted accessories...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 13, 2009 22:34 | #8 TY JD! Michael Bottoms wrote in post #7519747  Nice capture... just wondering... 186 s exposure--couldn't you use a lesser nd filter and a shorter exposure? I suppose if I owned any others I could have
LOG IN TO REPLY |
asty80 Senior Member  591 posts Likes: 54 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Pune, India via Bear, DE, US More info | Mar 13, 2009 23:14 | #9 picture seems a bit too symmetrical..how about cropping a bit from the top? Canon 5D Mark iii, Canon 40D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
1downfall Goldmember  4,059 posts Likes: 5 Joined Nov 2007 Location: virginia beach, va More info | Mar 14, 2009 08:42 | #10 asty80 wrote in post #7520216 picture seems a bit too symmetrical..how about cropping a bit from the top? excellent colors though!!  I am going to agree here as well. I think that if you took a little off the top it would bring the bottom up a bit and rid of some blank sky space....good efforts for early morning!! Bill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
psycorpse Senior Member  325 posts Joined Nov 2007 Location: St. Louis, MO More info | This is going to make me sound like a noob but for what its worth..... How do you come up with 186s? Just playing around until you go what you liked or is there some math to this? EF 50mm f/1.8 II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 14, 2009 10:38 | #12 Okay thnx again for the feedback, here's a cropped version as suggested.........any better?
psyco- I came up with 186s based on a rough estimate of the metered reading I was getting (1/10th iirc) and stopped down 10 steps to counter the ND filter. Why not just shoot w/out filter? I did that too but I wanted to get that soft look in the water and the feel of movement in the sky which couldnt be achieved at the time I took the image w/out overexposing the shot. BTW it was actually underexposed a lil bit, but I shot in RAW so I was able to pull two stops to save it somewhat.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 14, 2009 11:08 | #13 Very nice; I liked that crop version best. It seems to draw your eye into the photo more and really accent the wide angle perspective of the dock. Sony A7r, Sony 16-35 f4, Canon 1d3, Canon 70-200 f4L, Sigma 150-600 contemporary, G1X, Lee filter holder and gnd's, Singh-Ray reverse gnd
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hyperice Member  153 posts Joined Jul 2008 More info | Mar 14, 2009 14:27 | #14 WOW.... Canon 40d
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Anke "that rump shot is just adorable" UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009  30,454 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK More info | Mar 14, 2009 14:37 | #15 That was well worth dragging yourself out for! Anke
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ahmed0essam 1552 guests, 163 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
.......actually I just purchased a HiTech filter kit that includes a .6 & .9 but forgot to bring them with me.
