Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 14 Mar 2009 (Saturday) 08:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How much is too much?

 
sancho1983
Goldmember
Avatar
1,214 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 289
Joined Jan 2009
     
Mar 14, 2009 08:09 |  #1

How much sharpening is too much?

I've sharpened this to about the level i think looks ok, is it too much?

I used USM, some people i've read use Smart Sharpen, is there benefits of either?

IMAGE: http://i635.photobucket.com/albums/uu79/sancho_1983/IMG_5301.jpg

I also desaturated the background to help the flower stand out, forgot to go around and tidy the edges up, then flattened and saved as a Jpeg, so it's not great around the edges of the flower :oops:

Instagram (external link)
Https://bgsweddings.co​.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
freebird
Goldmember
1,348 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Iowa
     
Mar 14, 2009 10:11 |  #2

Hi Sancho,

I think that sharpened image @ that size looks ok on my laptop.

One feature in photoshop that often overlooked is the "Fade" effect that one can apply to effects . It has to be done immediately after you apply the effect.
Its under the Edit tab........Fade.

It works nicely especially for sharpening if globally applied. You get a regular photoshop size window to view the adjustments instead of the small USM window to preview with. It's worth checking out for sure




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sancho1983
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,214 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 289
Joined Jan 2009
     
Mar 14, 2009 11:38 |  #3

Thanks,

So you would over-sharpen if anything, and then play around with the fade until it looked good?


Instagram (external link)
Https://bgsweddings.co​.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zazoh
Goldmember
Avatar
1,129 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: MICO - Texas
     
Mar 14, 2009 16:31 |  #4

Nah, looks good, for a flower. ;-)a


A Camera - A Lens -- Gear Doesn't Matter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peano
Goldmember
Avatar
1,778 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Aug 2007
     
Mar 14, 2009 16:36 |  #5

sancho1983 wrote in post #7522253 (external link)
Thanks,

So you would over-sharpen if anything, and then play around with the fade until it looked good?

No, that's not a good idea. Oversharpening creates artifacts and noise. If you fade that, you still have artifacts and noise, just less than at 100%. When you sharpen correctly, it doesn't create a mess that needs cleaning up.


---
Peano
RadiantPics.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sancho1983
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,214 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 289
Joined Jan 2009
     
Mar 14, 2009 17:02 |  #6

So do you always start with 150%, 0.3 pixels radius, threshold 0?

Should i create a new layer and sharpen that?


Instagram (external link)
Https://bgsweddings.co​.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peano
Goldmember
Avatar
1,778 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Aug 2007
     
Mar 14, 2009 17:38 |  #7

sancho1983 wrote in post #7523639 (external link)
So do you always start with 150%, 0.3 pixels radius, threshold 0?

No, I start by looking at the image to see what it needs, and then I experiment. Having sharpened quite a few images, I don't have to experiment long. But I don't follow any formulas.

Should i create a new layer and sharpen that?

Yes, and I would also recommend using a layer mask on that new layer.


---
Peano
RadiantPics.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bobster
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,666 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 3292
Joined May 2006
Location: Dorset, England
     
Mar 14, 2009 18:57 |  #8

when posting for the web?

resize then

Sharpen>Sharpen

i then fade the sharpen to 60%


Robert Whetton (external link) Dorset Portrait & Events Photographer | Photoshop Guru
Gear | Gram (external link) | Ultimate Lens MA FoCal 2 (external link)| Ultimate RAW Editor C1 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
freebird
Goldmember
1,348 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Iowa
     
Mar 14, 2009 19:00 |  #9

sancho1983 wrote in post #7523639 (external link)
So do you always start with 150%, 0.3 pixels radius, threshold 0?

Should i create a new layer and sharpen that?

Each image will be different. Some lens stopped down to F8 need little if any sharpening. I prefer selective sharpening personally.

Portrait usually doesnt take much sharpening, I will look @ the eyes and adjust some if needed. Hair wont sharpen well.

As peano said I would not go heavy handed on sharpening to back it off later. A good example of the fade command sharp would be a landscape scene. In a full window you can see you whole sharp applied to the whole image. Foilage and trees can oversharpen very easily, especially if you have people in the scene too and try to sharpen the whole image.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sancho1983
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,214 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 289
Joined Jan 2009
     
Mar 15, 2009 12:16 |  #10

Forgive my ignorance, but how do i selectively sharpen? create a new layer, sharpen the entire image then 'paint' back the bits i don't want sharpened?

Thanks all


Instagram (external link)
Https://bgsweddings.co​.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.Horton
worship my useful and insightful comments
Avatar
18,051 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Royersford, PA
     
Mar 15, 2009 12:38 |  #11

sancho1983 wrote in post #7527556 (external link)
Forgive my ignorance, but how do i selectively sharpen? create a new layer, sharpen the entire image then 'paint' back the bits i don't want sharpened?

Thanks all

If you're talking about using a mask, yes, that will work.


Sam - TF Says Ishmael
http://midnightblue.sm​ugmug.com (external link) 
Want your title changed?Dream On! (external link)

:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peano
Goldmember
Avatar
1,778 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Aug 2007
     
Mar 15, 2009 12:42 |  #12

sancho1983 wrote in post #7527556 (external link)
Forgive my ignorance, but how do i selectively sharpen? create a new layer, sharpen the entire image then 'paint' back the bits i don't want sharpened?

That's one way to selectively sharpen. Another (which can be combined with what you describe above) is to use an edge mask. I use an edge mask for practically all sharpening. See the discussion here (external link) under "Capture Sharpening."


---
Peano
RadiantPics.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sancho1983
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,214 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 289
Joined Jan 2009
     
Mar 15, 2009 12:44 |  #13

S.Horton wrote in post #7527640 (external link)
If you're talking about using a mask, yes, that will work.

Yeah, i think so, my problem is i've taught myself how to use PhotoShop in an odd way, so i'm not entirely sure the best way to go about doing things, just muddle through :)

When i 'colour pop' something i create a new hue/saturation layer, take out the saturation, then select the pen tool and brush the colour back into what i want to be coloured. That's a mask right?

I presumed that's what i would do to selectively sharpen something, but instead of creating a new hue/saturation layer i would create a new 'sharp all over' layer


Instagram (external link)
Https://bgsweddings.co​.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Koidhis
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
16 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Land of the Midnight Sun
     
Mar 15, 2009 15:52 |  #14

Ever seen Marc Adamus' sharpening technique? Resize the image to about 1.6 the res you want for web, then apply the "sharpen" filter (seriously). Then create a duplicate layer and apply the filter again to the new layer, once or even twice. It will look horribly over sharpened and noisy in most cases. Then just re-size it to the size you want, and from there you can adjust the opacity of the top layer if it's still over sharpened or mask out areas that are too sharp.

What the resizing does is tricks photoshop into applying an ultra-fine USM, but the technique is variable depending on the photo content.


5D MkII gripped, 50D | 50 f/1.4, Tokina 11-16 f/2.8, 24-105 f/4L, 70-200 f/2.8L | TC-80N3 | Lee Filters | Gitzo GT2531, Gitzo off centre

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
freebird
Goldmember
1,348 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Iowa
     
Mar 16, 2009 12:37 |  #15

sancho1983 wrote in post #7527556 (external link)
Forgive my ignorance, but how do i selectively sharpen? create a new layer, sharpen the entire image then 'paint' back the bits i don't want sharpened?

Thanks all

Its just a basic selection. I like to use "quick mask" with a soft brush to make my selection. The tool is near the bottom of tools pallet on CS2. Once you make your selection you have to confirm your selection with the little box right next to it, and you will see the marching ants.

I use it alot ......for eyes on portrait, and also race cars so I dont have to sharpen asphalt, it looks terrible sharpened, about as bad as if you were to sharpen clouds.

Hope that makes sense, I confuse myself even lol:D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,672 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
How much is too much?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1103 guests, 164 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.