I cant decide if I like this shot or not, what are some of your opinions? I was messing with the tones and saturation, I just dont know if its to much or to little...lol anyways C&C always welcome
1
2
3
Mar 16, 2009 21:25 | #1 I cant decide if I like this shot or not, what are some of your opinions? I was messing with the tones and saturation, I just dont know if its to much or to little...lol anyways C&C always welcome 2 3 The Gear:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CBownPhoto Member  244 posts Joined Feb 2009 More info | Mar 16, 2009 21:27 | #2 It's slightly a little too busy for me, but I still like it. The log going across the top really leads my eyes everywhere, but I love the tones and water. Canon 1ds Mark II :. EF 24mm f/1.4 L USM II :. EF 35-350mm f/3.5-5.6L USM :. EF 85mm f/1.8 :. 580 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
friesr Member 177 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Colorado More info | Mar 16, 2009 21:33 | #3 I agree, too many angles. Did you get your feet wet and take one from the stream?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
oh i def got my feet wet from the second shot that I just added. I also added a pic without the log but I think I went over board with the greens The Gear:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pete40D Junior Member More info | Mar 16, 2009 22:52 | #5 The first picture is nice, although I agree The branches on the top are too much
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GaryMcDuffie Goldmember  3,022 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Scottsbluff, NE USA More info | Mar 16, 2009 23:02 | #6 lbcyalater wrote in post #7538169  I cant decide if I like this shot or not, what are some of your opinions? I was messing with the tones and saturation, I just dont know if its to much or to little...lol anyways C&C always welcome 1 Just my opinion, but the whites are way too blown (water) for my taste. I'm curious how some of these might have worked as HDRs. Gary
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Randy1213 Goldmember  1,087 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2007 Location: San Francisco More info | I like the second one very much. It's a simpler composition than the others and strongly conveys the energy of the moving water. Nice work. No-Excuses Kit: 1Ds Mk III, 1D Mk IV, 60D (IR Only). Lenses (all Canon): 16-35m f/2.8 L, 24-70mm f/2.8 L, 24-105mm f/4.0 L IS, 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS, 85 mm f/1.2 L MkII, 100mm f/2.8 macro, MP-E 65mm f/2.8 macro, 15mm f/2.8 fisheye. Support : Gitzo 3541L + RRS BH-55 LR Ballhead.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sparker1 Cream of the Crop  29,368 posts Likes: 295 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Sierra Vista, AZ More info | Mar 17, 2009 08:48 | #8 I like the composition of the first, EXCEPT for the log right across the viewing area. The colors are fine, but you must watch the highlights (water) that will be overexposed when you increase saturation and/or contrast. Stan (See my gallery at http://www.pbase.com/sparker1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 17, 2009 10:27 | #9 Randy1213 wrote in post #7538907 I like the second one very much. It's a simpler composition than the others and strongly conveys the energy of the moving water. Nice work. well thank you very much. The Gear:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MrGreen Goldmember  1,252 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Vancouver, BC More info | Mar 17, 2009 11:59 | #10 I really like #2. It's a neat angle that you don't see much of a waterfall. My site: www.millionflame.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CBownPhoto Member 244 posts Joined Feb 2009 More info | Mar 17, 2009 14:24 | #11 lbcyalater wrote in post #7541248 well thank you very much. and just a question to everyone about the log, is it the one on the bottom or the 2 at the top? The top. Canon 1ds Mark II :. EF 24mm f/1.4 L USM II :. EF 35-350mm f/3.5-5.6L USM :. EF 85mm f/1.8 :. 580 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
farrahj Member  37 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Denver, CO More info | Mar 17, 2009 14:26 | #12 I really like the first one...yeah...maybe the log is a bit distracting, but it doesn't really bother me. I'm less fond of the other 2, but I think you did a great job overall! =)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
oh and btw the second shot is on the top of that water fall, smack dab in the center of the water The Gear:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MichaelBottoms Cream of the Crop 6,297 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Whitby Ontario... just outside of Toronto More info | Mar 18, 2009 19:26 | #14 I really like the first one too, but found the log a bit of an issue... So I cropped it differently--what do you think?  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Former Pentax & 20D owner... now the pleased owner of the new 50D, 580EX, Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, Canon EF-S 60mm Macro, Canon EFS 17-85mm F/4-5.6 IS USM, Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 IS USM, Kenko 1.4X Teleplus Pro 300, Sekonic L-508 Zoom Master Meter, Manfrotto and slik tripods, trekpod and other assorted accessories...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ahmed0essam 1397 guests, 163 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
