Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 17 Mar 2009 (Tuesday) 13:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1st post for E-Shoot

 
Nancy
Member
88 posts
Joined Jul 2006
     
Mar 17, 2009 13:12 |  #1

I have been lurking long enough....time to post some images and get some honest feedback.
Thanks
Nancy <;0)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Mar 17, 2009 15:56 |  #2

Hey Nancy. glad you joined the farm and posted.

Your images are nice, but look quite overexposed. If you shot in RAW, re-process them and turn down the exposure until the skin tones look natural. I'm surprised they came out this bright with -1 EC. It just goes to show that camera meters are fooled easily. The best thing to do is to check the histogram and learn how to read them.

It is a very bright day but you shot at ISO400. ISO100 would have done a great job here with a bit more clarity at the pixel level.

When conditions are this bright, flash can help a lot by lifting out the dark shadowed areas. The sun was relatively low which is good, but when it's really high, the eyes tend to fall into deep shadow and that isn't preferred. Your flash will only function as a light fill so you do not need to diffuse or modify it. Fire it straight on and bare.

1. Nice that you didn't centre them, but it looks a bit odd to have them facing towards the short side. Maybe next time try making them face into to frame rather than out of it.

The horizon, water, and land make a really nice background, but it's really high in the frame. Lowering it and also lowering your camera angle a touch would make the awesome background more apparent and pretty.

They have their sunglasses on in both pics. For the most part, unless specifically requested, it's usually nicer to get mostly photos with their shades off, with a couple here and there with them on. The eyes are always the most looked at part of a portrait.

2 is a nice pose, but again it would be better with the shades off.

There are excellent background elements but they have not really been taken advantage of. Going wider and getting really close in would really bring the rocks out more, and going telephoto and standing further back would really bring the water into the shot. But at this focal length, neither of them really make any kind of impact.

In any case, they are nice photos and thanks for sharing!


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
Mar 17, 2009 16:17 |  #3

Looks more like +1EV than -1EV since the in-camera meter usually underexposes snowy environments.

I couldn't say anything of substance that ^ didn't already say.

General comments I have are to zoom in, zoom out, get close and personal or get far and show the environment, adjust your angles all the time, work around the subjects. If I have a chance I'll make 10 different photos from one pose and position, even if it isn't a good idea. In my case, the goal is to increase my odds of getting a good one even if I don't know what I'm doing.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nancy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
88 posts
Joined Jul 2006
     
Mar 19, 2009 12:39 |  #4

Thanks for the suggestions.....I sure have a lot to learn!
Nancy <;0)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,420 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
1st post for E-Shoot
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
776 guests, 145 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.