Just want to know what the best wide angle alternative to the 16-35 II would be? The price tag on that kinda steers me away from it. If that's the best then I'll do it, but I was just wondering if there were any close alternatives!
DallasPhoto Senior Member 711 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Texas More info | Mar 17, 2009 22:11 | #1 Just want to know what the best wide angle alternative to the 16-35 II would be? The price tag on that kinda steers me away from it. If that's the best then I'll do it, but I was just wondering if there were any close alternatives!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jerobean Senior Member 785 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2008 More info | Mar 17, 2009 22:17 | #2 17-40L comes to mind. _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rodinal Goldmember 1,127 posts Joined Jul 2008 More info | Mar 17, 2009 22:20 | #3 Permanent banDallasPhoto wrote in post #7545280 Just want to know what the best wide angle alternative to the 16-35 II would be? The price tag on that kinda steers me away from it. If that's the best then I'll do it, but I was just wondering if there were any close alternatives! It shouldn't. 1D Mark II • 16-35/2.8L mk I • 24-70L • 70-200/2.8L IS • 50/1.8 • 24-85 • 400/5.6L • 430EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jra Cream of the Crop 6,568 posts Likes: 35 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Ohio More info | Mar 17, 2009 22:21 | #4 17-40 is a great alternative if you can live with the f4 limit.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Mar 17, 2009 22:36 | #5 Nobody ever takes the Tamron 17-35 F2.8-4 very seriously, but it is a great lens. Matches the 17-40 in most regards (optically, not in build) Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 17, 2009 22:51 | #7 tkbslc wrote in post #7545409 Nobody ever takes the Tamron 17-35 F2.8-4 very seriously, but it is a great lens. Matches the 17-40 in most regards (optically, not in build) Ditto...I loved that little lens. Kinda mad I sold mine off (had the 17-55IS at the time, so didn't need it.) Might need to look another one up. John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
picturecrazy soft-hearted weenie-boy 8,565 posts Likes: 780 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Alberta, CANADA More info | Mar 18, 2009 00:21 | #8 The one thing that really irritated me about the 16-35 and 17-40 on the 1.3 crop is that it really isn't ULTRA-wide. It's pretty wide, but it really loses out on that super wide perspective that people buy those lenses for. 12mm 13mm 14mm 15mm 16mm -Lloyd
LOG IN TO REPLY |
1ruffryder Senior Member 715 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: shadow under the sun More info | Mar 18, 2009 02:46 | #9 love my tokina 11-16 Canon 1DMKII,Canon 5D MKI, Canon 5DMKII, Canon 30D, Tokina 11-16 f2.8, Canon 18-55 kit lens, Canon 17-40 f4L, Canon 70-200 f4L IS, Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro,Sigma 24-70 f2.8, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-105, Canon Nifty 50
LOG IN TO REPLY |
danmix Member 166 posts Joined Feb 2008 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Mar 18, 2009 05:52 | #10 1ruffryder wrote in post #7546467 love my tokina 11-16 why's it for sale in your signature? Dan Canon 7d|Canon 70-200 is usm ii|Tokina 11-16|Sigma 30, 50 F1.4|CY Ziess 28 2.8/50 1.7/85 2.8|Canon 24-105|Canon 70-300|Canon 100mm, 60mm Macro|Canon 300 F4|bits and pieces
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JelleVerherstraeten Goldmember 2,440 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Antwerp, Belgium More info | Mar 18, 2009 06:04 | #11 |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1124 guests, 167 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||