cbrown Member  73 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Groves, Texas More info | Mar 18, 2009 21:37 | #1 Have not posted in a long time. So I thought I would see if I am getting any better.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikekelley "Meow! Bark! Honk! Hiss! Grrr! Tweet!"  7,317 posts Likes: 16 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Mar 18, 2009 21:52 | #2 I would absolutely LOVE #2 if you rotated it 90 degrees CCW. Very cool.. you also may want to consider cloning out the stray hair or two on her shirt. Los Angeles-Based Architectural, Interior, And Luxury Real Estate Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin  44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | #2 is fabulous....if it were rotated it would look odd with her hair? As it is now, just fine. you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 18, 2009 22:24 | #4 I'm going to vote for #2 but rotated 180 degrees. Jim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin 44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | Mar 18, 2009 22:26 | #5 swjim wrote in post #7552850  I'm going to vote for #2 but rotated 180 degrees. Just tried it, and yep, a complete flip looks great! you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
luvsadog2 Goldmember  1,483 posts Likes: 17 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Reseda {Los Angeles}, California More info | Both gorgeous shots, you've captured a wonderful quality of innocense .. I agree that #2 would have an even stronger impact if rotated. Luvsadog2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Got up this morning and read your replies. So I gave it a try. I agree it looks a lot better. This is why I like this forum, I never thought about rotating it. Thanks for the help and the kind words.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aram535 Goldmember  1,915 posts Joined Sep 2007 Location: Long Island, NY More info | Mar 19, 2009 07:22 | #8 Excellent image. Gear List * www.tranquilphotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MawcDrums Member  220 posts Joined Feb 2009 Location: Soutington, CT More info | Mar 19, 2009 11:01 | #9 aram535 wrote in post #7554530 Excellent image. I'm sure you tried this already, but I would try two things: 1) Remove the 2nd light source from the eyes. 2) Try it with 1/3 less exposure to see if you can get a little more shadow to give the face more contour. I could be totally wrong though. I agree with the shadow / contour statement, the face does look a tiny bit flat...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin 44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | Something happened between the first photo you posted, and this rotated one? You lost some color and contrast? you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I resized the first two on my laptop and the last one was on my desktop, don’t know if that is the reason or not?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin 44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info |
No editing done, just tried taking it from your last shot and rotate for a difference.. I know you don;t have Image Edit enabled.so I will take it down if you wish...just wanted to see if the color was lost from the original. you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jubilee32 Senior Member 455 posts Joined Feb 2006 Location: Knoxville, TN More info | Mar 19, 2009 19:55 | #13 90 degree rotation is my favorite So much "stuff" - so little time
LOG IN TO REPLY |
First one was with a 50D with a 70-200 IS USM 2.8 it is my favorite lens. The second one was with a 50D with a 28-135 IS USM 3.5 on a ladder shooting over the top of her. Do you think the 70-200 is to long for studio work?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aram535 Goldmember 1,915 posts Joined Sep 2007 Location: Long Island, NY More info | Mar 20, 2009 06:21 | #15 cbrown wrote in post #7559630 First one was with a 50D with a 70-200 IS USM 2.8 it is my favorite lens. The second one was with a 50D with a 28-135 IS USM 3.5 on a ladder shooting over the top of her. Do you think the 70-200 is to long for studio work? No such thing, but in this case the "zoom" part was wasted as there is no subject to background to compress. I've seen many photographers use the 70-200 f/4 -- so I'm sure the 2.8 is fine for it too. Gear List * www.tranquilphotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is johntmyers418 1168 guests, 115 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
