trailguy Senior Member  More info | Mar 20, 2009 14:48 | #1 I'd love to see an image from a 'kit' lens such as 28-135 IS, and same composition, distance, etc taken with a good prime or L lens, prepared and displayed here in a fair, unbiased manner.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mfotography Senior Member  818 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: buffalo ny More info | Mar 20, 2009 15:17 | #2 taken with tamron 70-200 2.8 $700 bucks 1DX/ 1D4/ 6D/ 5D2/ Bunch of L's and Sigma's Fashion / Event Shooter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
coffeeguy415 Member 159 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | Mar 20, 2009 15:24 | #3 vwschwartz wrote in post #7564125  taken with tamron 70-200 2.8 $700 bucks http://mfotography.zenfolio.com/p1021557382/e1d415c4 taken with the 50mm 1.8 $80.00 bucks http://mfotography.zenfolio.com/p1021557382/ee2db9cc taken with 28-80 3.5-5.6 US $140 bucks http://mfotography.zenfolio.com/p1069028325/e1d3dfe70 taken with quantaray 70-300 macro $140 bucks http://mfotography.zenfolio.com/p990683307/eeb67967 at 300 macro~ http://mfotography.zenfolio.com/p990683307/e41c023d taken with canon 24-70L 2.8 $1,100 bucks http://mfotography.zenfolio.com/p999706639/e2521712e  so does the quality of a lens make a difference, yes of course ... can you still take great photos with inexpensive lenses .. yes!!! do models like L series glass the best ? Yes haha... just depends on your needs you can do amazing stuff with just about anything... hahahahahahah... ROFL. My setup in my bag.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mocows Goldmember  1,055 posts Joined Feb 2009 Location: Richmond, BC More info | Mar 20, 2009 15:26 | #4 Wow, L glass is better 7D | XSi + Phottix Grip | 400 F/5.6 | 70-200 F/4 | Sigma 30 f/1.4 | Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 |430ex | Horusbennu C-2830V | Photo Clam PC-33
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mfotography Senior Member 818 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: buffalo ny More info | Mar 20, 2009 15:29 | #5 haha well that was an after thought i was just going to stick with the mid range tamron 70-200 2.8 as top to show you dont need to spend a ton to have great sharp images, boken (sp) lol i really love the tamron 70-200 alittle noisey in the focus and not as quick as an 70-200 L 2.8 but for the money .. its "bling bling" 1DX/ 1D4/ 6D/ 5D2/ Bunch of L's and Sigma's Fashion / Event Shooter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OWSIU Senior Member 302 posts Joined Feb 2009 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Mar 20, 2009 15:50 | #6 Take your pick on the right...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SupaLao Senior Member 275 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Mechanicsburg, PA More info | Mar 20, 2009 15:55 | #7 coffeeguy415 wrote in post #7564167 hahahahahahah... ROFL. Check out his last link after you have gone through the first 4 links... The "L" turned into a hot chick!!! I love how you described and turn into example. I lol @ that one Dex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jblaschke Goldmember  More info | I've done this with my 28-135 and my Nifty Fifty. No contest--the prime kicks the zoom's @$$ with boot to spare. But my 28-135 still stays on my camera 90 percent of the time. It's a good lens, it just can't compete with the top of the line (or even the cheap-but-excellent Nifty). Canon 7D | Canon 50D IR modified | Canon EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS L | Canon FD 500mm 8.0 Reflex | Canon EF 85mm 1.8 | Canon EF 50mm 1.8 mk I | Canon EF-S 10-22mm | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Meade 645 (762mm f/5)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1228 guests, 149 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
I wish my L did that :P