Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 20 Mar 2009 (Friday) 19:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Any Manfrotto 438 Camera Leveller Owners Here?

 
Mike-DT6
Goldmember
Avatar
3,963 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2007
Location: The Jurassic Coast, Dorset, England.
     
Mar 20, 2009 19:43 |  #1

I received my new Manfrotto 438 camera levelling ball attachment today and wasn't too pleased with its operation. It almost jammed when operated as the lower edge of the 'ball' part caught up on the machining marks of the lower casting. This was with no weight on it at all, which got considerably worse when pressing down on it to simulate the weight of the camera and head.

I didn't want the inconvenience of sending it back and waiting for a new one (which would probably be the same) so I took it to bits and had a look. It was binding on quite a large part of the bearing surface on one side, as if the two items didn't correspond in their shape.

Anyway, after taking it apart and spending two hours working the items against each other with some cutting paste, and finally some abrasive polish before re-greasing it, I got it working smoothly.

I'm just wondering if any of you have a 438 and have had the same problem.

Mike

:-)


Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OldA1
Senior Member
Avatar
400 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Tampa, Fl.
     
Mar 20, 2009 19:55 |  #2

Mine worked great out of the box with no problems. The only thing that happened to me was that the screw for the locking lever fell out while shooting one day - new screw and some loc-tite and all has been well for over a year now. I do not recall noticing any type of grease on mine and I have not added any - it works pretty smooth and seems like grease would attract dirt and act like sandpaper. Sorry to hear you had to do some creative finishing to get yours to work.

Peace
Mark




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike-DT6
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,963 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2007
Location: The Jurassic Coast, Dorset, England.
     
Mar 20, 2009 20:25 |  #3

Thanks :-) All is well now!

Mine was greased with white grease, around the ball and locking lever pivot. I assumed that Manfrotto greased everything because both my tripod heads were greased, as were the leg clamps on my tripod.

Mike

:-)


Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Mar 21, 2009 10:23 |  #4

Mike,

Manfrotto kit can be a little rough round the edges. I had to do exactly the same thing with cutting paste on a 486 ballhead. Oh yes, it was smothered in grease as well.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Mar 21, 2009 11:51 |  #5

Mine (actually the older model 3502) was just a little stiff in the beginning. Just a little use smoothed it up and it's great now.

You don't want to overtighten the clamp, and I believe (it's been a while since I've adjust it at all) that you can adjust the position of the clamp lever on its shaft so that it clamps as tight as you wish when you move the lever full-stroke closed.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike-DT6
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,963 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2007
Location: The Jurassic Coast, Dorset, England.
     
Mar 22, 2009 22:10 |  #6

Thank you both.

Richard, glad to hear it's not just me then! On mine I ended up with a nice shiny lower edge to the 'ball' section and a slight, extra-shiny widening (maybe a couple of thousandths) of the lower casting on one side. God knows how they managed to machine it slightly oval!

Skip, I took measurements from mine before I took it to bits, but it didn't clamp exactly the same when I had ground it in, so I made the adjustment on the two spring-loaded countersunk bolts.

Mike

:-)


Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Mar 23, 2009 04:47 |  #7

Mike,

The beauty of having a simple but solid construction is we are able to do things like this. If my Markins M10 ever gives me grief, I'd think twice before tearing it apart, but Manfrotto stuff rewards the curious streak in us all.

The engineer in me likes "simple" things. It normally means "good design".


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike-DT6
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,963 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2007
Location: The Jurassic Coast, Dorset, England.
     
Mar 23, 2009 12:33 |  #8

Richard

I suppose that's one way of looking at it! I would have preferred it if they had machined the damned thing properly in the first place though, leaving me with more time to dismantle other things! :lol:

Mike


Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,306 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Any Manfrotto 438 Camera Leveller Owners Here?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1369 guests, 174 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.