I need some suggestions on a high distortion fisheye.
My main requirements are that it retain AF, not manditory but I would rather get AF, and it has to be very cheap.
Any suggestions?
Persian-Rice Goldmember 1,531 posts Likes: 14 Joined Apr 2004 Location: Behind a viewfinder. More info | Apr 07, 2005 13:18 | #1 I need some suggestions on a high distortion fisheye.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
blue_max Goldmember 2,622 posts Joined Mar 2005 Location: London UK More info | Apr 07, 2005 13:39 | #2 canal? .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Persian-Rice THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,531 posts Likes: 14 Joined Apr 2004 Location: Behind a viewfinder. More info | Apr 07, 2005 13:42 | #3 I dont buy anyhting new anyway...........but for this, I just want it to be cheap.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | Apr 07, 2005 13:42 | #4 Considering the DoF on a fisheye, forget the AF and consider the Russian one that's been talked about here. Best AF I see is the 15 mm Sigma at $450 (US) from B&H, and I'd hesitate to call that "very cheap". Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Persian-Rice THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,531 posts Likes: 14 Joined Apr 2004 Location: Behind a viewfinder. More info | Apr 07, 2005 13:48 | #5 To be honest, I want to pay in the one hundreds, not the four hundreds.............
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pcasciola POTN SHOPKEEPER 3,130 posts Joined Sep 2004 Location: Millstone Township, NJ More info | Apr 07, 2005 13:53 | #6 8mm Peleng russian circular fisheye is only about $200 (manual aperture and focus though). Sigma 8mm circular fisheye is about $400 I think. That's about the most distortion on a fisheye I have ever seen. Actually some nice examples of F1 shots over on pbase with the Sigma version. Philip Casciola
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ronchappel Cream of the Crop Honorary Moderator 3,554 posts Joined Sep 2003 Location: Qld ,Australia More info | Apr 07, 2005 15:48 | #7 At the price you want to pay your only options are:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pcasciola POTN SHOPKEEPER 3,130 posts Joined Sep 2004 Location: Millstone Township, NJ More info | ron chappel wrote: One of those add on fisheye converters.$50-70? These have the benifit of retaining AF and when used on a zoom give a variable effect.Image quality is bad at the edges but ok in the center Good call. I forgot about those things. I bought a 58mm threaded fisheye adapters to try on my kit lens just for kicks. If I go all the way out to 18mm I get a completely circular image (from vignetting, not because it's 180 degree view). It's more distorted than any 15 or 16mm fisheye I've seen, and retains autofocus. For web resolution it's fine, but for prints it would be pretty bad, especially around the edges like you said. Philip Casciola
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Persian-Rice THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,531 posts Likes: 14 Joined Apr 2004 Location: Behind a viewfinder. More info | Apr 07, 2005 18:26 | #9 Phil please do post. I would be using them for some small prints though. I will google them too.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Persian-Rice THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,531 posts Likes: 14 Joined Apr 2004 Location: Behind a viewfinder. More info | Apr 07, 2005 18:35 | #10 BTW, I was reading that the Peleng has an issue of hittng the mirror. Is this an issue with the 10D or 1DMKII?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pcasciola POTN SHOPKEEPER 3,130 posts Joined Sep 2004 Location: Millstone Township, NJ More info | Interesting about the Peleng. Thanks for pointing that out. I was planning on getting that lens soon but I'll have to check first. Probably will be ok on the 20D since the deep EF-S's are ok. The 58mm threaded wide angle adapter is nowhere near as distorted as that, but for a $40 solution it's a pretty interesting toy. 30mm 25mm Philip Casciola
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Persian-Rice THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,531 posts Likes: 14 Joined Apr 2004 Location: Behind a viewfinder. More info | Apr 07, 2005 20:12 | #12 That is more then sufficient, what brand is that? does it just thread to the filter threads?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pcasciola POTN SHOPKEEPER 3,130 posts Joined Sep 2004 Location: Millstone Township, NJ More info | It says Bower Titanium Digital Super Wide 0.42x AF lens, and the seller listed it as Digital Optics .42x wide angle/macro adapter. It's actually 52mm thread, and came with the 58mm step ring. With the kit lens I can focus from less than 1" away. Philip Casciola
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Persian-Rice THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,531 posts Likes: 14 Joined Apr 2004 Location: Behind a viewfinder. More info | Apr 07, 2005 20:39 | #14 I have a combination of step up/down rings from 77-67 67-52 etc etc so I guess I can use this on a bunch of lenses, thanks for the heads up.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ronchappel Cream of the Crop Honorary Moderator 3,554 posts Joined Sep 2003 Location: Qld ,Australia More info | [QUOTE=pcasciola]........ Of course I forgot to check ISO "AGAIN" so these are all ISO 1600......[QUOTE]/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is icebergchick 1157 guests, 162 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||