I suspect that I know the answer already, but I was wondering how the image quality would compare between these two options? If I am correct in thinking that even with the 1.4x extender on, the L set-up would blow the cheapie 75-300 out of the water at all focal lengths and aperatures, is there any reason to keep the 75-300, or should I sell it ASAP? (I thought about keeping it for its size and weight compared to the bigger glass, but then think that if I am going to be packing the SLR and not a P&S, I should keep the best glass on it that I can.)
I might try a side-to-side test, just for kicks. Any thoughts? Should I keep (as lightweight backup) or sell the 75-300?

I just can't see the point keeping it. Get the extender with the money instead ... I'm doing that, currently selling my 70-300 Sigma to pay for it (at no loss!) and then using it with my SH 70-200 F4 L.
.
.
