Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 07 Apr 2005 (Thursday) 17:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

70-200 f/4L + 1.4x vs. 75-300 USM III

 
MadTony
Senior Member
Avatar
430 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Colorado
     
Apr 07, 2005 17:20 |  #1

I suspect that I know the answer already, but I was wondering how the image quality would compare between these two options? If I am correct in thinking that even with the 1.4x extender on, the L set-up would blow the cheapie 75-300 out of the water at all focal lengths and aperatures, is there any reason to keep the 75-300, or should I sell it ASAP? (I thought about keeping it for its size and weight compared to the bigger glass, but then think that if I am going to be packing the SLR and not a P&S, I should keep the best glass on it that I can.)

I might try a side-to-side test, just for kicks. Any thoughts? Should I keep (as lightweight backup) or sell the 75-300?


Adam Pender
5DIII | 7DII | 16-35 f/4L IS | 24-70 f/2.8 L II | 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | 100-400 L IS II
Samyang 14/2.8 | TS-E 24 f/3.5L II | | Sigma 35 f/1.4 Art | 100 f/2.8L IS | 1.4x III | 2.0x III | 580EXII | 430EX
For sale:24-105 f/4L IS, 24 f/1.4L II
www.adampenderphotogra​phy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ron ­ chappel
Cream of the Crop
Honorary Moderator
Avatar
3,554 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Qld ,Australia
     
Apr 07, 2005 23:14 |  #2

I have seen online comparisons between these two and the 75-300 does seem to allways come out looking 'pretty good considering'
...Of course in actual use it's a totally different story.The 70-200/4+TC will get a high percentage of keepers while the 75-300 is nothing like that




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Apr 08, 2005 00:36 |  #3

Have you seen this review (external link)? It doesn't mention that TC but it has lens comparisions with the F4 and 75-300.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JusSmith
Member
Avatar
121 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Colchester, UK
     
Apr 08, 2005 01:03 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #4

I would keep the 75-300 (as I have) as you probably won't get much for it anyway! I use mine on occasions when I don't want to get the L out (environment conditions). If it's kept away from 300 (I stick at 200, as far as my L anyway) then the quality is ok after a bit of post touch-up.


Canon EOS 7D | 20D | Rebel S
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L | EF 70-200mm f/4L | EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Canon Speedlite 420EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cadwell
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,333 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Apr 08, 2005 02:23 as a reply to  @ JusSmith's post |  #5

I see little point in fitting a lower grade lens to your SLR when you own a better one that covers the same range. That smacks of masochism...


Glenn
My Pictures: Motorsport (external link)/Canoe Polo (external link)/Other Stuff (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Skip ­ Souza
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,204 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Mar 2005
Location: The Left Coast in the Land of Fruits and Nuts
     
Apr 08, 2005 02:29 as a reply to  @ Cadwell's post |  #6

Cadwell wrote:
I see little point in fitting a lower grade lens to your SLR when you own a better one that covers the same range. That smacks of masochism...

I can understand using the cheap lens in really nasty weather, (sandstorm, sleet, hail, nuclear fallout), due to the cost of the L. Go ahead and sacrifice the throw-away and keep the L in the velvet lined, platinum clad, diamond encrusted case :lol: :lol: :lol:


Bless the recently fallen and their family and friends.
I have a Cannon with me at all times. You can't take the shot if you don't have something with which to shoot. :rolleyes:
That which does not kill me ~~ Should Run.
5DMkII, 7D, 70-300L IS, 24-105L,
No more PayPal gift payment requests.
"PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,887 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Apr 08, 2005 03:15 as a reply to  @ JusSmith's post |  #7

JusSmith wrote:
I would keep the 75-300 (as I have) as you probably won't get much for it anyway!

Not at all sure about that ... I tracked the cheaper zoom lenses for a couple of weeks waiting for a bargain on ebay. The 75-300 regularly got over £100 and even beyond £130 on occasion. This is crazy as they can be had for that price new via 7dayshop
:lol: :lol: :rolleyes: ... even the USM.

Of course, depend how much was paid for it originally. The poster may even make money on it :) I just can't see the point keeping it. Get the extender with the money instead ... I'm doing that, currently selling my 70-300 Sigma to pay for it (at no loss!) and then using it with my SH 70-200 F4 L.


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mdr
Goldmember
Avatar
1,167 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
     
Apr 08, 2005 04:17 as a reply to  @ JusSmith's post |  #8

Living in Scotland, the environment conditions are always against you :(.

You've nearly convinced me that I should buy cheap lenses and leave my L glass in my display cabinet next to my classic rangefinder collection :evil:.


Marc
Glasgow, Scotland
www.marcderidder.com (external link)
www.deridder.me (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cadwell
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,333 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Apr 08, 2005 04:52 as a reply to  @ mdr's post |  #9

The L series lenses are designed for professional use and are expected to take a certain amount of "abuse". They're not intended for a cosseted life.


Glenn
My Pictures: Motorsport (external link)/Canoe Polo (external link)/Other Stuff (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JusSmith
Member
Avatar
121 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Colchester, UK
     
Apr 08, 2005 05:09 as a reply to  @ Cadwell's post |  #10

Easy for you pros to say with big budgets! My 75-300 cost me £150 14 years ago, I would love someone to offer me £100 for it!


Canon EOS 7D | 20D | Rebel S
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L | EF 70-200mm f/4L | EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Canon Speedlite 420EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mdr
Goldmember
Avatar
1,167 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
     
Apr 08, 2005 06:11 as a reply to  @ Cadwell's post |  #11

You thought I was serious? :lol: :lol: :lol:

As an amateur, and had to save up hard to afford a second hand 70-200mm f4 L and 1.4x TC Mk I. Still have my 75-300mm, but never used it again since I got the 70-200mm, so it'll go on eBay this weekend.

Gave the 70-300mm III USM to my dad for his 60th birthday.

Were both happy :D :D.


Marc
Glasgow, Scotland
www.marcderidder.com (external link)
www.deridder.me (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Apr 08, 2005 07:39 |  #12

The 'L' lenses are weather sealed, while the 75-300 is not.

I would suspect that is actually a reason more to use them in adverse conditions, as the risk to damage the lens is actually smaller.

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cadwell
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,333 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Apr 08, 2005 08:15 as a reply to  @ Andy_T's post |  #13

Andythaler wrote:
The 'L' lenses are weather sealed, while the 75-300 is not.

I would suspect that is actually a reason more to use them in adverse conditions, as the risk to damage the lens is actually smaller.

Best regards,
Andy


Not strictly true. SOME L series lenses are weather sealed, by no means all. The EF 70-200mm f/4L is NOT so don't go using it in a downpour and assuming you're safe.


Glenn
My Pictures: Motorsport (external link)/Canoe Polo (external link)/Other Stuff (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
malla1962
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,714 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Walney Island,cumbria,uk
     
Apr 08, 2005 12:56 as a reply to  @ condyk's post |  #14

condyk wrote:
Not at all sure about that ... I tracked the cheaper zoom lenses for a couple of weeks waiting for a bargain on ebay. The 75-300 regularly got over £100 and even beyond £130 on occasion. This is crazy as they can be had for that price new via 7dayshop
:lol: :lol: :rolleyes: ... even the USM.

Of course, depend how much was paid for it originally. The poster may even make money on it :) I just can't see the point keeping it. Get the extender with the money instead ... I'm doing that, currently selling my 70-300 Sigma to pay for it (at no loss!) and then using it with my SH 70-200 F4 L.

75-300 mk3 usm at 7day shop is £119 and yoy are right ive seen the go on ebay for £130 plus.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,887 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Apr 09, 2005 16:15 as a reply to  @ malla1962's post |  #15

malla1962 wrote:
75-300 mk3 usm at 7day shop is £119 and yoy are right ive seen the go on ebay for £130 plus.

When it comes to saving and making cash I'm not often wrong :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

So, JusSmith, you know where to sell your 75-300 now! Nice picture, good description, good selling record and you're sorted.


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,273 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
70-200 f/4L + 1.4x vs. 75-300 USM III
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1401 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.