Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 23 Mar 2009 (Monday) 23:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

is this photoshopped too much?

 
ngrohosky
Senior Member
327 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: LONG BEACH, CA
     
Mar 23, 2009 23:50 |  #1

i think it looks too fake :( but the only skin editing tutorials i could find taught me how to use "surface blur" but i dont know if that will always suffice. did it come out okay this time? suggestions are all too welcome :) thanks


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
psycorpse
Senior Member
Avatar
325 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO
     
Mar 24, 2009 00:07 |  #2

TBH, It makes her look younger. I wouldn't say fake looking only because I don't know what she looks like in person. If I had personally known her then maybe it would look fake.


EF 50mm f/1.8 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DerekSimon
Senior Member
736 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Cleveland, OH
     
Mar 24, 2009 08:34 |  #3

I would say that it does look okay. The most important part is if she thinks it looks okay because it is of her. Slightly too dark also


www.dereksimon.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tharmsen
Goldmember
Avatar
1,737 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: NW Indiana
     
Mar 24, 2009 09:04 |  #4

If you ask me it's a little over done. It's obvious editing has been done. If done right, edits should look pretty much natural and the viewer shouldn't be able to tell.

Good start though and good technique. I would just tone it down a little.




Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stathunter
"I am no one really"
Avatar
5,659 posts
Likes: 60
Joined Aug 2006
Location: California & Michigan
     
Mar 24, 2009 09:07 |  #5

tharmsen wrote in post #7587324 (external link)
If you ask me it's a little over done. It's obvious editing has been done. If done right, edits should look pretty much natural and the viewer shouldn't be able to tell.

Good start though and good technique. I would just tone it down a little.

Agreed.

I think you did a good job.


Scott
"Do or do not, there is no try"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
droberts
Senior Member
261 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Missouri
     
Mar 24, 2009 09:20 |  #6

On her face isn't to bad. Where i see the problem is on her hand, there is no surface. I think you could do more here with just the healing tool, that would maintain the character in her face and hands. Sometimes the texture of a persons skin tells a story about that person adding to the feel of the shot. Save all the PP for glamour shots.


Canon Stuff...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ngrohosky
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
327 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: LONG BEACH, CA
     
Mar 24, 2009 13:41 |  #7

what techniques do you guys use in photoshop? i've heard of cloning, but is that a technique in cs3?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kinkbmxrydr
Member
36 posts
Joined Feb 2009
     
Mar 24, 2009 21:23 |  #8

The fingers look fake. Rest looks good.


Canon 50D 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM, 50 f/1.4, 15 f/2.8, 70-200 f/4L, 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stirfried
Member
122 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Suzhou, China
     
Mar 24, 2009 22:01 |  #9

ngrohosky wrote in post #7588963 (external link)
what techniques do you guys use in photoshop? i've heard of cloning, but is that a technique in cs3?

For fine control over lines and wrinkles, I use an overlay (like you would for burning). There's a good tutorial on exactly this at: http://av.adobe.com/ru​ssellbrown/SoftDodgeSM​.mov (external link) (Don't get put off by the car, the second half of the video is exactly what you want, I think). Cloning is basically copy/pasting parts of the image onto other parts to hide things (or to make it look like you married triplets :D). It's usually horrible, horrible, horrible for this kind of thing. The healing tool is OK for small blemishes, the overlay method above is good for lines and wrinkles, and smoothing/liquefying is ok for changing the texture of the skin, but you can usually see its been done.


5DmkII, 400D, 24-105mm f/4L IS, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 135mm f/2L, 35mm f/1.4L, Sigma 150mm f/2.8 macro, 85mm f/1.8, 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 10-20mm f/4.0, Tamron 18-250mm f/3.5.... Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ngrohosky
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
327 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: LONG BEACH, CA
     
Mar 25, 2009 00:36 |  #10

thanks for your help :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Illumined
"i love you guys"
Avatar
2,641 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Stafford, VA, USA
     
Mar 25, 2009 06:39 |  #11

droberts wrote in post #7587403 (external link)
On her face isn't to bad. Where i see the problem is on her hand, there is no surface. I think you could do more here with just the healing tool, that would maintain the character in her face and hands. Sometimes the texture of a persons skin tells a story about that person adding to the feel of the shot. Save all the PP for glamour shots.

+1, couldn't have said it better myself.

you have strong glamour post-processing skills though for whenever you may need them.


Ravi J.H. | Make an experience out of it - focus and expose manually.
Sony RX1 | Sony FDA-EVM1K (EVF) | Nikomat 11" cloth-locking cable release | Previous Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ngrohosky
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
327 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: LONG BEACH, CA
     
Mar 25, 2009 10:31 |  #12

thank you very much :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
imacmadman22
Member
Avatar
31 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Arizona
     
Mar 26, 2009 00:38 |  #13

When I do stuff like this I usually duplicate the background layer and work on a copy, that way you can adjust the opacity of the top layer to make your edits look more natural. Just make a copy of your background and edit that, then adjust the opacity to allow some of the b/g to show through your edit, that allows you to strike a balance between the original and the edit and that makes the result more realistic and less obvious that it has been processed. Hope that makes sense!


Gear List
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/imacmadman22/ (external link) http://www.flickr.com/​photos/digitalslrmadne​ss/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eror11
Senior Member
314 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Europe
     
Mar 26, 2009 09:55 |  #14

yeah, +1 on the opacity of the 2 layers (above me)

i think the face is a bit overdone too (under the nose etc), and especially the hands (she has no joints and her fingernails that should be relatively sharp have no texture)...


7D with 24-70

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coondogg
Member
Avatar
249 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
     
Mar 26, 2009 12:44 |  #15

Looks cartoonish to me.


Canon 20D :: 50mm f/1.8 :: 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 :: 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS :: 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS :: 430EX
A560
ZR850
My flickr: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/33580255@N02/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,292 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
is this photoshopped too much?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
694 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.