I suppose that my main question here would be - if the 40d for a similar price would be a "better" camera than the 500d. I am interested in the video capabilites. I am interested in the lower weight of the 500d. I am not sure that I will ever have need or occassion to shoot at 1/8000 second or that I would need a shutter rated for 200K actuations. And I don't believe that I would need 6 frames per second (3.5 frames per second is quite fast as well) but I also want an IQ at least that of the 40d. I mean, if the 2 cameras are approx the same price, but I gain all the above in addition to better ISO and IQ, I will sacrifice the weight and the video......
Am I making sense?






