Hi. I have a camera body with not so great kit lens.
I was wondering what 2 good first lenses would be. I don't have alot so spend, maybe around 250-400, and want something with around 2.8f
Thanks for your input
deming Member 155 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: FLA More info | Mar 24, 2009 22:51 | #1 Hi. I have a camera body with not so great kit lens. some rods and cones. an iris or two.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sumadaz Member 152 posts Joined Dec 2007 More info | Mar 24, 2009 23:00 | #2 What camera body and what "not so great kit lens" do you have? It is kind of important to know. Canon XTi - Opteka grip - Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 - Sigma 10-20mm - Canon 50mm f/1.8 - Canon 430ex II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mk1Racer Goldmember 1,735 posts Likes: 9 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Flagtown, NJ More info | Mar 24, 2009 23:36 | #3 You need to let us know what you have now. If it's the 18-55 non-IS or the 75-300 non-IS, yes, you can get better lenses that are w/in your budget. If you've got a 28-135 IS or a 17-85 IS, you're going to be hard pressed to find better zooms w/in your budget. I would pick up a 50 f/1.8 II They're $85 new on Amazon, and usually go for between $65 and $75 on here. If you want something longer than the 50, that's at least f/2.8, look at the 100 f/2 or the 135 f/2.8. They're both w/in your budget, although the 100 f/2 is on the high end, and doesn't leave anything for the 50. 7D, BG-E7, BGE2x2 (both FS), 17-55 f/2.8 IS, 17-85 f/4-5.6 IS (FS), 50 f/1.8, 85 f/1.8, 70-200 f/2.8L IS Mk I, 70-300 f/4-5.6L, 550EX, Kenko Pro300 1.4xTC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MetroPhoto Member 53 posts Joined Feb 2009 Location: Canada More info | Mar 25, 2009 00:23 | #4 Mk1Racer wrote in post #7592602
Hah, my brother in law just purchased that for my sister. They are getting into photography and have a toddler niece to take practice pictures on.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Mar 25, 2009 00:25 | #5 You can't get two f2.8 lenses for $250-400 total that will make up a good kit. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jennnyy Member 39 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Mar 25, 2009 02:28 | #6 my first two lens was the canon 50 1.8 and sigma 70-300. good prime and decent telephoto.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 25, 2009 07:27 | #7 I have a 450D with the 18-55 IS. I don't really like the lens and plan on selling it. I do alot of hiking/outdoor stuff. some rods and cones. an iris or two.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
trmwf Goldmember More info | Mar 25, 2009 07:38 | #8 I would look at the canon 50mm for about $80 and the canon 55-250is for around $300 but have to ask why you don't like the 18-55. I didn't like mine at first then I discovered how to use the camera and found that what I didn't like wasn't the lens fault. Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 25, 2009 08:01 | #9 trmwf wrote in post #7594079 I would look at the canon 50mm for about $80 and the canon 55-250is for around $300 but have to ask why you don't like the 18-55. I didn't like mine at first then I discovered how to use the camera and found that what I didn't like wasn't the lens fault. Mike well, the kit lens seems a bit fuzzy, and it's hard to get a crisp shot. Even with the IS on and with a fast shutter speed. Things just look "flat" and not much better than a P&S lens. some rods and cones. an iris or two.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tarzanman Senior Member 548 posts Joined Feb 2009 More info | Mar 25, 2009 08:12 | #10 Are you shooting it wide open? How much light is there? I agree that the 18-55 IS is rather mediocre... some people have gotten decent results with theirs, though
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gasrocks Cream of the Crop 13,432 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA More info | Mar 25, 2009 08:31 | #11 As mentioned, you can only get so much for so little money. However, you can get 2 good lenses to start with: ef-s 18-55 IS and ef-s 55-250 IS. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 25, 2009 09:56 | #12 450 a little money! I don't know what country you live in but mine's in a recession...lol some rods and cones. an iris or two.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mk1Racer Goldmember 1,735 posts Likes: 9 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Flagtown, NJ More info | Mar 25, 2009 10:13 | #13 deming wrote in post #7594868 450 a little money! I don't know what country you live in but mine's in a recession...lol Welcome to the wonderful world of quality optics. This gets to be a _really_ expensive hobby, if you get serious about it, and you're not making any money from it. 7D, BG-E7, BGE2x2 (both FS), 17-55 f/2.8 IS, 17-85 f/4-5.6 IS (FS), 50 f/1.8, 85 f/1.8, 70-200 f/2.8L IS Mk I, 70-300 f/4-5.6L, 550EX, Kenko Pro300 1.4xTC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonnoob Cream of the Crop 8,487 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Atlanta, GA More info | Mar 25, 2009 10:15 | #14 deming wrote in post #7594195 well, the kit lens seems a bit fuzzy, and it's hard to get a crisp shot. Even with the IS on and with a fast shutter speed. Things just look "flat" and not much better than a P&S lens. FYI... it has been proven that IS should be turned off at high shutter speeds, and on a tripod because it causes movements within the lens when it is not needed.. David W.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fashioneyes Senior Member 562 posts Joined Sep 2007 Location: Surrey, United Kingdom More info | Mar 25, 2009 10:17 | #15 Surprised no-one has asked what you shoot as that would determine what length lenses to get, but you are going to struggle to get two lense for that budget. I'd concentrate on one for the time being and come back later. 1D4, 7D, 5D2 + L lenses Links: Jepson Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1747 guests, 172 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||