Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 26 Mar 2009 (Thursday) 18:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Victory over America Palace, Iraq

 
Walkingmanblues
Member
Avatar
200 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Jun 2008
     
Mar 26, 2009 18:51 |  #1

I shot these last weekend at the Victory over America Palace and the Ba'ath Party Complex outside Baghdad. I'm forever experimenting with B&W conversions. Are these working for you? Any suggestions/comments would be much appreciated.

#1

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


#2
IMAGE: http://mmacdona.zenfolio.com/img/v7/p47262102-4.jpg

#3
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kanonshooter
Senior Member
406 posts
Joined Sep 2008
     
Mar 26, 2009 19:40 |  #2

Numbers two and three are GREAT! One and two could maybe use a bump in contrast. Three is perfect. I Like em'.


EOS 550D, EFS 15-85mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Mar 26, 2009 21:17 |  #3

I like #3. It has a great mood and a wonderful range of tonal values.

#2 is OK, although it is very static.

#1 is rather blah - difficult to know what is the subject.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Walkingmanblues
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
200 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Jun 2008
     
Mar 27, 2009 05:18 |  #4

kanonshooter wrote in post #7606267 (external link)
Numbers two and three are GREAT! One and two could maybe use a bump in contrast. Three is perfect. I Like em'.

Thanks, KS. I'm doing all of my PP on a laptop and I'm forever tiliting the screen trying to figure out what is the "truest" viewing angle. If I want to increase the contrast in a photo, all I have to do is tilt the screen a little;) Anyway, I'll give it another try. And thanks again!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Walkingmanblues
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
200 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Jun 2008
     
Mar 27, 2009 05:23 |  #5

Robert_Lay wrote in post #7606863 (external link)
I like #3. It has a great mood and a wonderful range of tonal values.

#2 is OK, although it is very static.

#1 is rather blah - difficult to know what is the subject.

Thanks for the help, Bob. Can you explain to me what you mean by "static"? Is this something I can "fix" or is it a problem inherent in the picture itself?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Mar 27, 2009 09:01 |  #6

#3 is a classic. Nice work. Love the lighting.


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Mar 27, 2009 14:28 |  #7

Walkingmanblues wrote in post #7608527 (external link)
Thanks for the help, Bob. Can you explain to me what you mean by "static"? Is this something I can "fix" or is it a problem inherent in the picture itself?


By "static" I mean that the composition - the placement of major elements of the scene - is such that it does not encourage the eye movement that is necessary to make a picture interesting and get your attention. The more centric are the main elements, the more static it is.

Fixing the problem can sometimes be accomplished through cropping - especially when there is plently of room around the main subject(s). For example, in the image in question, removing a big chunk of empty foreground or empty sky would get the main elements off center vertically.

Another, hypothetical example would be a black ball on a white background. Being centered both horizontally and vertically would be the most static composition possible, whereas placing the back ball on the interesections of imaginary lines that divide the image into 3 rows and 3 columns (the rule of thirds), will make the image more dynamic or dramatic.

A good place to find more: http://en.wikipedia.or​g/wiki/Rule_of_thirds (external link)


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Walkingmanblues
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
200 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Jun 2008
     
Mar 27, 2009 17:31 |  #8

Thanks, Bob, for the additional help/advice and the citation. Clearly, I have much left to learn. I tried a different crop with your advice in mind. Do you think this works better?

Re-edit #2

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Walkingmanblues
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
200 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Jun 2008
     
Mar 27, 2009 17:37 |  #9

scorpio_e wrote in post #7609329 (external link)
#3 is a classic. Nice work. Love the lighting.

Thanks, scorpio_e. I got pretty lucky with the light in that shot. I was having a hard time because I didn't have a tripod. I was laying down and leaning up against whatever I could find trying to steady the camera. The place is all ruble and dust from the bombing. I looked like a coal miner when I came out:lol: I was afraid to change lenses because I was sure my sensor would never be the same if I exposed it in there...so to speak.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phrasikleia
Goldmember
Avatar
1,828 posts
Likes: 14
Joined May 2008
Location: Based in California and Slovenia
     
Mar 27, 2009 18:04 as a reply to  @ Walkingmanblues's post |  #10

No. 1 leaves me wondering what it looked like in color, which is never a really good thing with B&W photos.

No. 2 seems appropriate in B&W, but it lacks depth and leading lines. The strong horizontals and verticals are at odds with each other.

No. 3 is simply sublime. A truly wonderful B&W image.


Photography by Erin Babnik (external link) | Newsletter (external link) | Photo Cascadia Team Member (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Mar 27, 2009 21:32 |  #11

I think everyone would agree that it is better with the new crop. Then you are left with other issues, such as general interest and scale. A picture is sometimes helped a lot in both scale and interest through the simple expedient of the inclusion of a human figure.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,515 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Victory over America Palace, Iraq
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
932 guests, 147 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.