hello. just got my 5D yesterday and got a chance to take the 70-200 out to the lake for some birding.
all C&C welcome....
JohnPhotography Senior Member 861 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2008 Location: SoCal More info | Mar 27, 2009 00:31 | #1 hello. just got my 5D yesterday and got a chance to take the 70-200 out to the lake for some birding. R3 x3 | 1Dx mkIII | 1Dx mkII | RF 24-70mm | RF 24-240mm | RF 600mm | RF 70-200 | EF 16-35 | RF 100-500
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Titus213 Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 27, 2009 00:54 | #2 Interesting enough shots but the 70-200 just isn't long enough for bird shots IMO. I love mine but get quite frustrated at its lack of reach. But I didn't buy it for birds... Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 27, 2009 01:06 | #3 Titus213 wrote in post #7607976 Interesting enough shots but the 70-200 just isn't long enough for bird shots IMO. I love mine but get quite frustrated at its lack of reach. But I didn't buy it for birds... At least with the 5D you can crop a bit before losing too much quality. i completely agree. i found that out when i was shooting, def not long enough. R3 x3 | 1Dx mkIII | 1Dx mkII | RF 24-70mm | RF 24-240mm | RF 600mm | RF 70-200 | EF 16-35 | RF 100-500
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KarlJohnston Cream of the Crop 9,334 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2008 More info | Mar 27, 2009 03:04 | #4 Permanent banTell those guys to come back up here, they're missed. Adventurous Photographer, Writer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
My trick to birding is to use spot metering, you want that critter's exposure to be correct, background is of little concern. The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 27, 2009 08:59 | #6 I like #4. I am not a birder though *LOL*
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 27, 2009 12:52 | #7 thanks, i fully understand i don't have the "proper" equipment for birding....but it seem right at the time.lol R3 x3 | 1Dx mkIII | 1Dx mkII | RF 24-70mm | RF 24-240mm | RF 600mm | RF 70-200 | EF 16-35 | RF 100-500
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KarlJohnston Cream of the Crop 9,334 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2008 More info | Mar 27, 2009 14:16 | #8 Permanent banBull****, you have excellent equipment for birding. Don't listen to those snobby 1D mark III users with their 10 FPS and 6500 $ lenses. Adventurous Photographer, Writer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Titus213 Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 27, 2009 14:16 | #9 I do enjoy the 70-200 for backyard birding. You can get a lot closer which is your other option. Stealth....sneak up on the critters. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 27, 2009 14:20 | #10 Karl Johnston wrote in post #7611328 Bull****, you have excellent equipment for birding. Don't listen to those snobby 1D mark III users with their 10 FPS and 6500 $ lenses. Just gotta work a little bit harder with what you have and adapt it to your needs. thanks for the words of encouragement! i intend to make my equipment work for me. Titus213 wrote in post #7611335 I do enjoy the 70-200 for backyard birding. You can get a lot closer which is your other option. Stealth....sneak up on the critters. It's all fun. ![]() ain't that the truth! when i shot those pix above, i got close and was a bit scared they were gonna come attack me!lol R3 x3 | 1Dx mkIII | 1Dx mkII | RF 24-70mm | RF 24-240mm | RF 600mm | RF 70-200 | EF 16-35 | RF 100-500
LOG IN TO REPLY |
highcountry Senior Member 345 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: Parker, CO More info | Mar 27, 2009 15:43 | #11 Very nice shots for your first attempt. You might want to procure a 1.4x in the future. It works great with my 70-200mm. I use manual exposure for BIF shots which means setting the exposure on a mid-tone in the light you will be shooting the birds in. Then adjust if the light changes. This will keep the birds from being a dark silohuette against light backgrounds such as the sky. John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 27, 2009 15:53 | #12 thanks John. yeah, i've started to lookinto the tc 1.4x. R3 x3 | 1Dx mkIII | 1Dx mkII | RF 24-70mm | RF 24-240mm | RF 600mm | RF 70-200 | EF 16-35 | RF 100-500
LOG IN TO REPLY |
highcountry Senior Member 345 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: Parker, CO More info | Mar 28, 2009 21:05 | #13 MacFly, the 70-200mm can work really well under the right circumstances. Here's a few shots from last weekend with that lens with a 1.4x on a 40d. Your 5D would have worked fine as well. John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 29, 2009 02:02 | #14 highcountry wrote in post #7619684 MacFly, the 70-200mm can work really well under the right circumstances. Here's a few shots from last weekend with that lens with a 1.4x on a 40d. Your 5D would have worked fine as well. ![]() ![]() ![]() those are awesome. can you briefly give me the settings you shot with?! R3 x3 | 1Dx mkIII | 1Dx mkII | RF 24-70mm | RF 24-240mm | RF 600mm | RF 70-200 | EF 16-35 | RF 100-500
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gking Member 120 posts Joined Nov 2006 More info | Mar 29, 2009 11:05 | #15 Some of the pictures have more space in front of the flying birds, but others do not. Centered flying birds do not look as good as when there is space in front of them. Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi ; Canon EOS 650 35mm; Canon Zoom Lens EF-S 18-55mm 58mm -1:3.5-5.6 II; Canon EF 70-210mm 1:4; Canon EF 50mm1:1.8; Canon EF 28mm; Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro; Canon Speedlite 420 EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1370 guests, 179 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||