So its time to buy another wideangle/fish zoom.
the 16-35 and 17-40 dont have enough distortion. i loved my 10-22 but yeah, i dont have it now.
What can i use on teh 1dmk3 that will give me distortion like the 11-16 or 10-22 (obviously efs stuff)
yokotas13 Senior Member 558 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: myrtle beach, south carolina More info | Apr 02, 2009 06:08 | #1 So its time to buy another wideangle/fish zoom. -Grant
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drPheta Goldmember ![]() 1,060 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Massachusetts, USA More info | Apr 02, 2009 07:47 | #2 11-16 @ 12.5mm works, and that's what I use at the moment.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 02, 2009 07:55 | #3 the Sigma 12-24 is full frame capable as well and i've tried it on my 1D2 and it is incredibly wide www.vividemotionphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yokotas13 THREAD STARTER Senior Member 558 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: myrtle beach, south carolina More info | Apr 02, 2009 14:56 | #4 yeahi had my 10-22 on my 5dmk2. but i sold it for some dumb reason. -Grant
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MrChad Goldmember ![]() 2,815 posts Joined Aug 2004 Location: Chicagoland More info | Canon's 15mm fisheye has a wider FOV then even the 14mm prime. Else the Siggy 12-24mm EX is useable on FF or larger then APS as others have said. I kaNt sPeL...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yokotas13 THREAD STARTER Senior Member 558 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: myrtle beach, south carolina More info | Apr 02, 2009 17:50 | #6 i already have a fish -Grant
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cicopo Goldmember ![]() More info | Apr 02, 2009 18:31 | #7 It looks like this on a 1.3 body when at 12 mm.
lots more at 12 mm in the album here. http://picasaweb.google.com/cicopo/IberostarCozumel# ![]() A skill is developed through constant practice with a passion to improve, not bought.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
n1as Goldmember 2,330 posts Likes: 25 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Salem, OR More info | Apr 02, 2009 20:15 | #8 Isn't there a danger of the mirror hitting the back of an EF-S lens? I put my Tokina 11-16 on the 1D II today just to look and it appears that optically it would be useable from about 13 to 16 mm but I did NOT take a photo for fear the mirror might hit the lens. - Keith
LOG IN TO REPLY |
picturecrazy soft-hearted weenie-boy ![]() 8,565 posts Likes: 777 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Alberta, CANADA More info | Apr 02, 2009 20:21 | #9 word on the tokina 11-16 on the 1D3. Great combo. It's much smaller and lighter than the Sigma 12-24... takes regular filters, optically excellent, and gives you F/2.8. 12mm 13mm 14mm 15mm 16mm -Lloyd
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cicopo Goldmember ![]() More info | Apr 02, 2009 20:51 | #10 Canon built their EF-S lenses in a way that will cause trouble when used on bodies that they didn't want them used on. Sigma & Tamron don't seem to have followed that policy so they haven't put lens parts into the mirror box area. If the lens has sections of it that stick well beyond the mount flange then suspect trouble, but if they are flush with the mount flange there isn't anything for the mirror to hit. A skill is developed through constant practice with a passion to improve, not bought.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
n1as Goldmember 2,330 posts Likes: 25 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Salem, OR More info | Apr 02, 2009 20:57 | #11 Oh I am SOOOO glad about this. - Keith
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yokotas13 THREAD STARTER Senior Member 558 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: myrtle beach, south carolina More info | Apr 03, 2009 08:55 | #12 picture- -Grant
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is Cutiepiewee 1425 guests, 192 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |