Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 04 Apr 2009 (Saturday) 14:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lens for dim lit Live music shows.

 
BigAlz1
Goldmember
Avatar
1,475 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Somewhere Great!
     
Apr 04, 2009 14:26 |  #1

Aside from my aspirations to do portraiture and candid shots of F&F, I have connections to start doing back stage and front stage shots at small and large concert venues. I still have my budget I posted about and I am wanting to go with one good, or a couple good primes. But I need help.
I have only shot primarily with zooms my only prime being a 50mm 1.8 (so so so soft was the lens, it was indeed a bad copy but I bought it used and have sold it with a combo deal on EBAY) I need a little help on what to go with for low light stage shots.
I know I will need wide shots and I know I will want tight close shoots but I know primes will give me an edge in the lower light and give me the sharpness I want, also they will double as good portrait lenses as well.
So I know I want primes but I have to keep in mind flexibility and IQ.

I am leaning toward the fallowing, a Sig 30MM 1.4 (or fifty but this will be my wider-ish lens). And an 85mm 1.8 (have not ruled out an 85L 1.2)

I think that just one of the above two would really cut me short on some shots I want to take. How do you guys feel about the 35, 85 combo for doing those type of shots in that internment? And how will those two lenses serve me in my other photo ventures?

I would really like to hear from people that have shot in that type of environment, and people who have use those lenses for low light situation.

Thanks all.

(BTW, I shot one show before with my nifty-fifty before I rid myself of it and I had to do way to much moving in and out and the IQ just wasn't there for me.)




Eos 7D, 40D w/70-200L 2.8 IS, 50mm 1.4, Nifty Fifty II, 100MM 2.8 Macro, 18-135mm IS , Sigma 30mm 1.4 , Sigma 18-35 1.8 ART 580ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
philthejuggler
Goldmember
Avatar
2,300 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Northants, United Kingdom
     
Apr 04, 2009 17:02 |  #2

I shot almost an entire concert on the 70-200L 2.8 IS & 40D and found it fantastic - I was getting good results @ ISO800, aperture priority set at f2.8 and shutter speeds were going from 1/80 to about 1/160. The IS was invaluable.

Given you've got the 17-55mm as well you'll probably be able to cover most events with those two lenses, but it would probably be good to go with one fast prime - 30mm Sigma (although I've had endless focussing hassle with those), 35L, 50mm f1.4 or f1.2, 85mm f1.8 or f1.2.

Given that wider lenses can be hand-held at slower shutter speeds there is an argument for going with a longer faster lens. My preferred lenses for concert photography would be the 50mm f1.4 or f1.2 (be aware of the back-focus issues - probably not an issue for this concert photography though) or an 85mm lens to compliment your exisiting lenses.

The 135L is also good, but 70-200 with IS trumps it in this instance.

Phil


Blog (external link), Website (external link) http://www.pho2u.co.uk …pher-in-northamptonshire/ (external link)
1DsIII, 5DIII, ZE21mm, 50mm 1.2, 85mm 1.2II, 135 f2, 580EXIIx2, X-Pro1x2, 18-55, 35 1.4, 60 2.4, EF-X20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAlz1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,475 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Somewhere Great!
     
Apr 04, 2009 17:15 |  #3

Thank you so much, after doing more reading, the 35L seems like it would fit the bill plus fill in nicely for a much needed, sharper, portrait lens.
Right now I am leaning toward getting 35L and 85mm 1.8 to round out my collection for my needs. (would still like a great macro too)
Am def getting the 85mm 1.8 but the 35L for dim light and portraiture I am still contemplating. That is so close to the 85L price range :( can't get both lol




Eos 7D, 40D w/70-200L 2.8 IS, 50mm 1.4, Nifty Fifty II, 100MM 2.8 Macro, 18-135mm IS , Sigma 30mm 1.4 , Sigma 18-35 1.8 ART 580ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
philthejuggler
Goldmember
Avatar
2,300 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Northants, United Kingdom
     
Apr 04, 2009 17:18 |  #4

I would head for 85 f1.2 rather than 35L for portraits. Depends on the type of portraits I guess, but the traditional head & shoulders stuff is where the 85L shines. It is also fantastic for getting amazing 3D like effects using thin dof.

Phil


Blog (external link), Website (external link) http://www.pho2u.co.uk …pher-in-northamptonshire/ (external link)
1DsIII, 5DIII, ZE21mm, 50mm 1.2, 85mm 1.2II, 135 f2, 580EXIIx2, X-Pro1x2, 18-55, 35 1.4, 60 2.4, EF-X20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Apr 05, 2009 13:34 |  #5

IMO, you'll need something wider then 30mm on a crop.
The sigma 30/1.4 would be nice for half body portraits, a 50/1.4 would be nice for a bit closer shots or stage overviews from a distance, and the 85/1.8 would be nice for tight close ups.

For wide, the only option for a fast prime is the Sigma 20/1.8

That being said: The EF-s 17-55 IS also comes to mind here...

Hop over to the Performing Arts forum; quite a few guys shoot with some or all of the stuff I mentioned.

IMO a 85/1.2 is nice, but doesn't add much over the 85/1.8 in this environment.
Also, I'd rather get a Sigma 30 then a 35L, and spend the price difference elsewhere.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BscPhoto
Senior Member
Avatar
625 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2008
Location: East Haven, CT
     
Apr 05, 2009 16:11 as a reply to  @ René Damkot's post |  #6

Just keep in mind that there is a lot of problems with "bad copies" or just plain non calibrated Sigma lenses, so be prepared to have the time to send the lens back or send it out to be calibrated if you were indeed to get a "bad copy" IME all 3 Sigma lenses I've had mis focused 99% of the time.

I've recently shot two comedy shows for a few guys from The Howard Stern Show and it was so dark. The 85 1.2 II 70-200 2.8 IS and 24mm 1.4 on a FF was perfect. I never had to go over ISO 1600

On a crop I would suggest either the 24, 35 or 50 1.4 or the 85 for a bit longer lens. FYI the 85 1.8 is a great lens, only slightly less IQ then the 1.2 but nearly as sharp


•MEGAPIXELS are OVERRATED•

BSCphoto.com (external link)
Photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAlz1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,475 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Somewhere Great!
     
Apr 05, 2009 16:11 |  #7

I have the 17-55 :) thanks for your input bud. I am going to make a purchase soon I am sure I will get the right stuff, i hope.




Eos 7D, 40D w/70-200L 2.8 IS, 50mm 1.4, Nifty Fifty II, 100MM 2.8 Macro, 18-135mm IS , Sigma 30mm 1.4 , Sigma 18-35 1.8 ART 580ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
k.lee
Senior Member
395 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Apr 05, 2009 18:19 |  #8

+1 on the 85 1.8

Here's a couple shots I've gotten at a small sized venue.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 400 | MIME changed to 'text/plain'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 400 | MIME changed to 'text/plain'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 400 | MIME changed to 'text/plain'

Kelvin
Gear list

My
Blog
external link / Flickrexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Apr 06, 2009 06:44 |  #9

BscPhoto wrote in post #7672779 (external link)
all 3 Sigma lenses I've had mis focused 99% of the time.

Yeah, there seem to be a few bad ones out there, however, my Sigma 20/1.8 focusses just as accurate as my EF 28/1.8 and EF 50/1.4 on my 1D, and needs less micro adjustment on my 1D3 then those two...


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jdumas
Senior Member
Avatar
382 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Jan 2008
Location: SLC, Utah
     
Apr 06, 2009 11:22 |  #10

René Damkot wrote in post #7676441 (external link)
Yeah, there seem to be a few bad ones out there, however, my Sigma 20/1.8 focusses just as accurate as my EF 28/1.8 and EF 50/1.4 on my 1D, and needs less micro adjustment on my 1D3 then those two...

+1 on the sigma 20mm 1.8, my favorite to take to shows. I owned a sigma 30 1.4 and sold it. I was not that happy with the focus consistency.


http://jdumas.smugmug.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
braidkid
Senior Member
Avatar
371 posts
Joined Oct 2008
     
Apr 06, 2009 12:59 as a reply to  @ Jdumas's post |  #11

I don't see how you could use a 85mm on a crop indoors unless it's a large venue. When I shoot shows I try to get up front and really need something wider than 35mm.

That said, i'd suggest 24L for small venues and/or a 50 1.4 for larger ones.


5Dii, 16-35 f4L, 50f1.4, 580ex II, 430ex II
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/braidkid/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
k.lee
Senior Member
395 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Apr 07, 2009 13:47 |  #12

braidkid wrote in post #7678441 (external link)
I don't see how you could use a 85mm on a crop indoors unless it's a large venue. When I shoot shows I try to get up front and really need something wider than 35mm.

That said, i'd suggest 24L for small venues and/or a 50 1.4 for larger ones.


I guess it's relative to how big is big? The venue I shot at holds around 150-200 people. I wouldn't call that big, but I guess it's not really "small" either. 85mm would give a nice tight body shot like the ones I posted. Really depends which kind of shots you want.


EDIT: Forgot to mention, I was probably less than 10 feet away from the performers, if that gives you an idea of the distance.


Kelvin
Gear list

My
Blog
external link / Flickrexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
toxic
Goldmember
3,498 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: California
     
Apr 07, 2009 15:06 |  #13

do you have an idea of the distance and framing you want? 'cause once you know that, you can pick out the focal lengths that work for you, and there's a fast lens for almost every focal length between 20 and 200mm.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,199 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Lens for dim lit Live music shows.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1265 guests, 180 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.