Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 05 Apr 2009 (Sunday) 12:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Macro Lenses

 
aram535
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,915 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Apr 05, 2009 22:29 |  #16

The project is small parts from a manufacturer, and the 1:1 is really the requirements not macro. I'm just used to the macro lenses and therefore a shorter learning curve.


Gear List * www.tranquilphotos.com (external link) * My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WMS
"Escargot on the Hoof"
Avatar
2,887 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2006
     
Apr 05, 2009 23:14 |  #17

Considering that you indicated that rental is an option, and that you don't feel that you need a dedicated macro most of the time you might seriously consider rental. BorrowLenses.com has the EF100 macro (and other macro options)

http://www.borrowlense​s.com/category/canon_m​acro (external link)

which you indicated you did own and I would presume are familiar with for rent for about $30.00 a week, and less if you need a longer term. There are probably NYC options as well I think that both Adorama and B & H Photo rent equipment.

Wayne


I'm just a simple maker of love charms and tokens,who occasionally takes a picture or two.
Gear list: more toys than I need, Fewer than I want.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CAL ­ Imagery
Goldmember
Avatar
3,375 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2008
Location: O-H
     
Apr 05, 2009 23:36 |  #18

aram535 wrote in post #7672497 (external link)
2) I heard nothing bad things about the Sigma's so why spend the extra $200-$300 on it?

I've also heard bad things about the 1D/s Mark IIIs, but I would still buy 'em if I could afford 'em.


Christian

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aram535
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,915 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Apr 06, 2009 08:19 as a reply to  @ aram535's post |  #19

joe mama wrote in post #7673321 (external link)
I can help on a few of them:

"HSM"--> "Hypersoning Motor" ("USM" -- "Ultrasonic Motor" for Canon)
"EX" --> "L"
"OS" --> "Optical Stabilization" ("IS" -- "Image Stabilization" for Canon)
"IF" --> "Internal Focus"
"DC" --> "Digital Crop" ("EF-S" for Canon)

Perfect, exactly as I needed. They seem to have all of the same technical criteria and the MTF charts look just about the same. Any idea why the 70mm is more expensive than the 105mm?

WMS wrote in post #7675267 (external link)
Considering that you indicated that rental is an option, and that you don't feel that you need a dedicated macro most of the time you might seriously consider rental. BorrowLenses.com has the EF100 macro (and other macro options)

http://www.borrowlense​s.com/category/canon_m​acro (external link)

which you indicated you did own and I would presume are familiar with for rent for about $30.00 a week, and less if you need a longer term. There are probably NYC options as well I think that both Adorama and B & H Photo rent equipment.

I was hoping there was some major leaning one by the group on one of the lenses, so it would make my decision for me. But you're right it seems I just have to rent one or maybe two of them to one complete the job and two see which one I like better for either purchase or future rentals.

nphsbuckeye wrote in post #7675396 (external link)
I've also heard bad things about the 1D/s Mark IIIs, but I would still buy 'em if I could afford 'em.

Your argument aside, I'm just impressed with the number of logical falacies that you broke with one statement. Very impressive. :-)

I really don't think one has a direct correlation to the other. If two "like" items were the same price, would you pay an extra 25% for the label?


Gear List * www.tranquilphotos.com (external link) * My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike
ugly when I'm sober
Avatar
15,398 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 393
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Canterbury/Ramsgate, UK
     
Apr 06, 2009 09:16 |  #20

I have the Sigma 105 macro and think it is excellent.

Here's a couple of shots from me:
http://www.flickr.com …in/set-72157615841378944/ (external link)
http://www.flickr.com …in/set-72157615841378944/ (external link)

The second one is a stack of 8 shots but was taken with my small studio setup at about 1:1 magnification. As you can see it is very sharp. I cannot recommend this lens enough. :D


www.mikegreenphotograp​hy.co.uk (external link)
Gear
UK South Easterners
flickr (external link) Insta1 (external link) Insta2 (external link)

A closed mouth gathers no foot.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WMS
"Escargot on the Hoof"
Avatar
2,887 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2006
     
Apr 06, 2009 14:50 as a reply to  @ aram535's post |  #21

I was hoping there was some major leaning one by the group on one of the lenses, so it would make my decision for me. But you're right it seems I just have to rent one or maybe two of them to one complete the job and two see which one I like better for either purchase or future rentals.

Well IF you are looking for a consensus there is this poll... https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=160960

Wayne


I'm just a simple maker of love charms and tokens,who occasionally takes a picture or two.
Gear list: more toys than I need, Fewer than I want.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Apr 06, 2009 17:08 as a reply to  @ WMS's post |  #22

I had the Canon 100 macro but found that I needed more reach. Sold it and picked up the Sigma 150/2.8 macro. Both lenses are incredibly sharp. I'm not really a Sigma fan, but the 150 macro is a pretty darn good lens.


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jr_senator
Goldmember
Avatar
4,861 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Apr 06, 2009 19:32 |  #23

CountryBoy wrote in post #7672447 (external link)
If you want the lens hood and tripod collar for the canon, add about another $180 for it .

There are rings and hoods (and decent ones) for well less than $180, and I mean well less.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
versedmb
Goldmember
4,448 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Apr 2006
     
Apr 06, 2009 20:41 |  #24

LostShootingStar wrote in post #7672191 (external link)
I like the 105 personally
IMAGE NOT FOUND
| Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

IMAGE NOT FOUND
| Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Ditto. I really can't get over how nice of a lens is this for the money. I bought mine used for less than $300....

f/4 on 5D....

IMAGE: http://brownphotography.smugmug.com/photos/505115199_NochA-L.jpg

Gear List

Michael

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vincent_su
Senior Member
Avatar
843 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Denver, Colorado; USA
     
Apr 06, 2009 20:49 as a reply to  @ versedmb's post |  #25

If you are looking into another macro lens, check out the EF 180 and MP-E.
I had a Signma 105 macro and ended up gave it out for free while selling other stuff. Whatever you buy, there's a chance of getting a bad copy.
Let us know what you need the lens for and budget, some experts can give you best advices.
Good luck with the hunt.


Vincent
"My dark room is bright and I like it."
5Diii; 24-105 f/4; 100 Macro f/2.8; 17-40 f/4; 70-200 f/4 IS; 100-400 II; TS-E90 and stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jr_senator
Goldmember
Avatar
4,861 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Apr 06, 2009 21:14 |  #26

If you will be doing life-size (1:1), then be sure to get a focusing rail.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CountryBoy
"Tired of Goldmember label"
Avatar
5,168 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Okie
     
Apr 06, 2009 21:21 |  #27

jr_senator wrote in post #7680821 (external link)
There are rings and hoods (and decent ones) for well less than $180, and I mean well less.

I was just going by B&H prices for the canon rings and hoods. I didn't add in shipping. Either way Canon should include them with the lens, even if they increase the price.


Hi

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,157 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
Macro Lenses
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is slipper1963
1600 guests, 170 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.