grs Mostly Lurking 12 posts Joined Jan 2009 More info | Apr 07, 2009 01:36 | #1 Hi,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xarqi Cream of the Crop  10,435 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand More info | Apr 07, 2009 01:43 | #2 Tamron 18-270 VC.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JelleVerherstraeten Goldmember  2,440 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Antwerp, Belgium More info | Apr 07, 2009 02:45 | #3 |
Apr 07, 2009 02:47 | #4 JelleVerherstraeten wrote in post #7682899  What is your budget? I should say, get a 24-105. As a multi purpose, it's amazing! If its a lens im going to get a lot of use out of i dont mind spending the money...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 09, 2009 15:14 | #5 I have a Sigma 18-50 F2.8 EX Macro.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rocktoe Senior Member  303 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: Gainesville, FL More info | I'm also looking for a replacement for my XSi kit lens, what do you guys think about Tamron AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di-II LD SP ZL Aspherical? Look behind you! A three-lensed camera! 450D | Sigma EF 530 DG ST Flash | Canon 50mm f1.4 | Canon 85mm f1.8 | Sigma 17-70mm f2.8-4.5 DC Macro | Canon 70-200 f2.8L |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wr1020 Junior Member 21 posts Joined Mar 2009 More info | Apr 18, 2009 18:18 | #7 Rocktoe wrote in post #7757250 I'm also looking for a replacement for my XSi kit lens, what do you guys think about Tamron AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di-II LD SP ZL Aspherical? I bought the Tamron when i upgraded my XSi kit lens. Excellent lens and i got it at a really good price so i couldn't turn it down. Haven't mounted my kit lens since i've had the Tamron. Canon 450D | Canon BG-E5 Grip | Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 | Sigma 10-20 f/4.0 | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 70-300 f/4.0 | Speedlite 430EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
denno75uk Member  162 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Leeds, but out of Liverpool, UK More info | Another big thumbs up for the Tamron 17-50 here too. Not without it's minor niggles, ie slightly noisy AF motor that is slower than HSM or USM, but all in all the Tamron is some of the best money I've ever spent. It's incredibly sharp, even at f2.8. Gear: 30D, Tamron 17-50 2.8, Canon 28-105 3.5-4.5 USM II, Sigma 70-200 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I have the same question. I have a nifty fifty and a 70-200 f/4L and the awful kit lens. I was thinking the 24-70L. Opinions? I really like the L series and would like to confine myself to L series lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wr1020 Junior Member 21 posts Joined Mar 2009 More info | Apr 18, 2009 20:01 | #10 denno75uk wrote in post #7757499 Another big thumbs up for the Tamron 17-50 here too. Not without it's minor niggles, ie slightly noisy AF motor that is slower than HSM or USM, but all in all the Tamron is some of the best money I've ever spent. It's incredibly sharp, even at f2.8. Yeah that's really my only gripe with the lens as well, the AF is quite noisy. But this can easily be overlooked with its sharp optics and good IQ wide open. Canon 450D | Canon BG-E5 Grip | Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 | Sigma 10-20 f/4.0 | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 70-300 f/4.0 | Speedlite 430EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wr1020 Junior Member 21 posts Joined Mar 2009 More info | Apr 18, 2009 20:02 | #11 Rainyday wrote in post #7757588 I have the same question. I have a nifty fifty and a 70-200 f/4L and the awful kit lens. I was thinking the 24-70L. Opinions? I really like the L series and would like to confine myself to L series lenses. Thanks! If 24mm is wide enough for you at the wide end then i say go for it. For me 24mm wouldn't be wide enough so it's a lens i wouldn't purchase since i shoot with an XSi. Now if i went full frame i would definitely consider purchasing it. Canon 450D | Canon BG-E5 Grip | Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 | Sigma 10-20 f/4.0 | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 70-300 f/4.0 | Speedlite 430EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
asiaminor Member 66 posts Joined Oct 2008 Location: San Francisco, CA More info | Apr 18, 2009 20:42 | #12 17-55mm 2.8IS 450D | 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | 580EX II | 190XPROB | 488RC2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rocktoe Senior Member 303 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: Gainesville, FL More info | Apr 18, 2009 20:55 | #13 asia minor wrote in post #7758105 17-55mm 2.8IS i replace my XSI kit lens with it can could not be happier. Yeah, but I think I'll never be able to justify spending that kind of money for glass. Look behind you! A three-lensed camera! 450D | Sigma EF 530 DG ST Flash | Canon 50mm f1.4 | Canon 85mm f1.8 | Sigma 17-70mm f2.8-4.5 DC Macro | Canon 70-200 f2.8L |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
liupublic Goldmember 1,114 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Tempe AZ More info | Apr 19, 2009 12:31 | #14 I would have suggested either a 60mm prime macro. You can try to shoot with a larger aperture lens, excellent IQ and macro shot on top. Still learning
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigAlz1 Goldmember  1,475 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Somewhere Great! More info | Apr 19, 2009 12:35 | #15 +1 for the 17-55 2.8 is, best lens I have owned to date!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is xrhstaras23 1770 guests, 111 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
