Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 10 Apr 2009 (Friday) 17:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Good "All Around" "Every Day" use lens for EOS 30d?

 
tristay
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Apr 10, 2009 17:35 |  #1

Hello everyone. I am looking for a good "All Around" lens for every day use. I am not a photog and don't do any portrait work, just taking pics of the family and kids outside, inside, at night, on trips, and holidays. I take some pics of ebay items sometimes also. I currently have a 100mm 2.8 USM for macro and the lens that came with my camera an EFS 18-55. I was told I could use the 100mm 2.8 for all around use and macro so I purchased it, but I have found I have to be a "mile" away just to take a pic of the kids so I have to be really far away to get everything in the pic. Not sure if there is a setting to fix this or not. Is there a way to use the 100mm 2.8 as both macro and "every day use"? Is there a lens out there that will serve both purposes? If not what lens would you recommend to add to my collection for an all around every day use?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
agc1019
Member
184 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Boston, MA
     
Apr 10, 2009 17:37 |  #2

What do you find limiting about your EF-S 18-55?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Grentz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,874 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Midwest, USA
     
Apr 10, 2009 17:48 |  #3

You have a good idea of focal lengths by having the 18-55 and the 100 macro. I would suggest you figure out what are you want more or less range in and then go from there. Truth be told, the 18-55 is a great all around range for many, and if you just want more IQ in that range something like the off brand 17-50s or the Canon EF-S 17-55 f2.8 IS (more money) would be good ones to look at.

Other good options if you want a larger zoom range sacrificing the wide end a bit would be the 24-105 or for a mid-long range zoom something like the 70-200.

There is no one answer as it depends on the person. For example, many think that 24 is not wide enough on a crop body like the 30D for a walkaround, personally I love my 24-105 as a walkaround.


Search.TechIslands.com (external link) - Photography Shopping Search Engine

www.TechIslands.com (external link) - News and Reviews

My Gear List - 60D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tristay
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Apr 10, 2009 17:49 |  #4

Not really limiting. Well I was thinking that the 100mm 2.8 would serve both purposes, macro and normal use. I guess I am wanting a lense that will do both more than anything. If I want to take a pic of my kiddos then turn around and take a close up of them I would like to be able to do both without changing lenses if possible.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mr ­ B ­ Snappy
Senior Member
400 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Norfolk - UK
     
Apr 10, 2009 17:51 |  #5

sigma 17-70


No matter how much you learn, there's always someone who knows more.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ianfp
Goldmember
Avatar
1,775 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 8
Joined Apr 2006
Location: UK
     
Apr 10, 2009 17:56 |  #6

If you can afford it, I think the 24-105L would do a great job. It is very flexible due to IS and zoom range. It also has a macro mode, although this would not give true macro as per your 100mm lens. It was my preferred lens on my 1.6 camera.
Ian


Ian
Nikon D850, 85mm f/1.4G
5D2
EF17-40 f/4.0 L, EF135 f/2.0L EF200 f/2.8L

EF24-105L, EF100 f/2.8L Macro. EOS-M, 22mm f/2
Hasselblad 500C/M, Planar 80mm f/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roy ­ Mathers
I am Spartacus!
Avatar
43,850 posts
Likes: 2915
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
     
Apr 10, 2009 18:02 |  #7

I endorse everything Ianfp has said.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roastpuff
Member
Avatar
143 posts
Joined Jul 2008
     
Apr 10, 2009 18:03 as a reply to  @ tristay's post |  #8

The 100mm focal length (160mm on your 30D, due to the "crop" factor) is what it is... you just need more space to take the picture if you want to have the entire body and its surrounding shown. What it's awesome for is close-up (in terms of view, might not be distance) portrait shots where you are focusing on the face, or a particular action that's happening (hand picking up a toy, etc). It's also great for getting very close shots of eyes, ears, noses etc.

For a more "all-purpose" lens for the 30D, try the Tamron 17-50 f2.8 if you don't want to spend all that much, or the Canon 24-105 f4L IS if you can afford it. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tristay
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Apr 10, 2009 18:04 |  #9

What is "IS" and "IQ"?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brett
Goldmember
Avatar
4,176 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Ohio
     
Apr 10, 2009 18:06 |  #10

tristay wrote in post #7706382 (external link)
What is "IS" and "IQ"?

Image stabilization and image quality.

17-55 2.8 IS is my recommendation. Everyone who has one seems to love it.



flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
agc1019
Member
184 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Boston, MA
     
Apr 10, 2009 18:17 |  #11

tristay wrote in post #7706303 (external link)
If I want to take a pic of my kiddos then turn around and take a close up of them I would like to be able to do both without changing lenses if possible.

When you say a "close up" picture of your kids, do you really need macro? Does "close up" mean a head shot? If so, your 18-55 should be fine. But if you want to fill the entire frame with, say a single eye, then yeah, you'll need something approaching macro.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tristay
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Apr 10, 2009 18:25 as a reply to  @ agc1019's post |  #12

To AGC1019, I already have the Canon 100mm 2.8 macro. I am wondering if there is a lens out there that would do the same job as the 100mm 2.8 and also "every day" use all purpose lens so I didn't have to change lenses so much. Is there much difference between the 17-55 and the 18-55?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Apr 10, 2009 18:31 |  #13

What is your budget?


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snatiep
Senior Member
Avatar
540 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
     
Apr 10, 2009 21:51 |  #14

+1 Sigma 17-70


Nate
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ceegee
Goldmember
2,335 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Montreal, Quebec
     
Apr 10, 2009 22:41 |  #15

Another to consider is the Tamron 28-75, which is a very nice range for an everyday walkabout, and does a great job on close-up photography too. I find this a good range with kids, where you don't necessarily need a wider lens, but sometimes need the extra length.


Gear: Canon R10, Canon RFS 18-150, Canon RF 100-400

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,640 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Good "All Around" "Every Day" use lens for EOS 30d?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2845 guests, 160 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.