Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
Thread started 11 Apr 2009 (Saturday) 06:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Question for 500mm f/4 users....

 
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,915 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10108
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Apr 13, 2009 16:07 |  #16

As mentioned, it is certainly easier with the TC off,.
It can be done,. here's a Kingfisher taken with the 2X mounted,..

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]
http://images.fotopic.​net …p;outx=600&​noresize=1

But the camera and lens AF faster and more precisely with no TC,.. especially with the X0D bodies.

GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,629 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8372
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Apr 13, 2009 16:19 |  #17

Jake, that's a great pose on the Kingfisher!

Liz - what wonderful light on the Sandhill! I stalked these last week. A coupel hour stalk came to nothing, as they had some sentries located in an area when they coule see me about 90 yards away. There was no other direction from which to approach, so I simply struck out - several hundred yards of sliding thru the dust and stubble on my belly, and not even a single image worth taking. Another day "paying my dues". Too many of those lately, it seems.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gymell
Goldmember
Avatar
3,783 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 73
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Bloomington, MN
     
Apr 13, 2009 16:39 |  #18

Tom Reichner wrote in post #7722746 (external link)
Jake, that's a great pose on the Kingfisher!

Liz - what wonderful light on the Sandhill! I stalked these last week. A coupel hour stalk came to nothing, as they had some sentries located in an area when they coule see me about 90 yards away. There was no other direction from which to approach, so I simply struck out - several hundred yards of sliding thru the dust and stubble on my belly, and not even a single image worth taking. Another day "paying my dues". Too many of those lately, it seems.

I guess I had an unfair advantage, I spent 2 nights in a blind out on the Platte river so was right in the midst of thousands of them. ;)


-Liz
My online gallery (external link) and Live Streaming Feeder Cam (external link)
Help native birds - discourage house sparrows! (external link)
Minnesota Master Naturalist (external link) - "Explore, Teach, Conserve"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,629 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8372
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Apr 13, 2009 19:57 |  #19

gymell wrote in post #7722873 (external link)
I guess I had an unfair advantage, I spent 2 nights in a blind out on the Platte river so was right in the midst of thousands of them. ;)

Liz,

Did you have to do overnights in the blind so that you would already be in place come morning? I've heard that thsi is how one must go about photographing grose when they're displaying on leks, but have not yet heard of doing this for waterfowl.

-Tom


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gymell
Goldmember
Avatar
3,783 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 73
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Bloomington, MN
     
Apr 14, 2009 14:43 |  #20

Tom,

The blinds are right out on the banks of the river, and one is on a sandbar practically in the river. They take photographers out in the late afternoon before the cranes come in, and let us out after the cranes leave the next morning. This is so the cranes don't flush prematurely and you can get good sunset/sunrise shots. Check out http://www.rowesanctua​ry.org/photo%20blinds.​htm (external link) for more details about the blinds. Also more of my photos (including pictures of the blind itself) at http://www.pbase.com/g​ymell/rowe_sanctuary (external link) .


-Liz
My online gallery (external link) and Live Streaming Feeder Cam (external link)
Help native birds - discourage house sparrows! (external link)
Minnesota Master Naturalist (external link) - "Explore, Teach, Conserve"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim ­ Neiger
Senior Member
608 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Likes: 9
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Kissimmee, Florida
     
Apr 15, 2009 17:24 |  #21

IMAGE: http://www.flightschoolphotography.com/POST/BKSTACK.jpg
The above image was made using a 1D2N and a 500mm+1.4xTC+2xTC stacked, The wide open aperture was F11 and the effective focal length was 1720mm. The image was made using handheld technique and a well thought out plan. Was it difficult? Yes. Was it impossible? Of course not! Small birds in flight can be very difficult. I think that is one of the best reasos to try to do it. With lots of practice Tree Swallows against the sky are easy with the 500mm. It's a bit harder with a 1.4x and a lot harder with the 2x. It's VERY difficult against a varied bg. The key to it all is proper technique and lots of practice.

Jim Neiger - Kissimmee, Florida
Get the Book: Flight Plan - How to Photograph Birds in Flight (external link)
Please visit my website: www.flightschoolphotog​raphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
highcountry
Senior Member
345 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Parker, CO
     
Apr 25, 2009 16:46 |  #22

There was a lull while photographing sandhill cranes and geese when this magpie appeared to give a little aerial demonstration. It was about a 100 yds out so I took the opportunity to test my combo's ability (1Ds2/500mm/1.4x) to capture this guy. Came out better than I thought they would. This is the smallest bird that I have attempted to photograph in flight.

IMAGE: http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff29/highcountry_photo/Wildlife/Alamosa/Magpie1.jpg

IMAGE: http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff29/highcountry_photo/Wildlife/Alamosa/Magpie2.jpg

These guys are more my speed.

IMAGE: http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff29/highcountry_photo/Wildlife/Alamosa/Crane22.jpg

IMAGE: http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff29/highcountry_photo/Wildlife/Alamosa/Crane-Print-SuperA3.jpg

IMAGE: http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff29/highcountry_photo/Wildlife/Alamosa/Crane7.jpg

John
40D, 1Ds MkII, EOS 1N, EF24-70mm F2.8L, EF70-200mm f4L, EF500mm f4L, 580EXII, EF 1.4x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hawkman
Member
Avatar
200 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Illinois, USA
     
May 04, 2009 19:59 |  #23

It's tough at 700mm to keep the subject in view. I mostly shoot eagles in flight and a gimbal mount on a tripod helps. I don't think that work well for smaller birds.

I would try a bushhawk for smaller birds. It wil lgive you the extra stability you need for tracking smaller birds.

Gene


- Gene
http://hawkman.smugmug​.com (external link)

Walk softly and carry a big lens!

1D Mark III, 1D Mark IIN, 500/4L, 400/5.6L, 135/2L,, 35/1.4L, 50/1.8, EF 1.4X II, Gitzo 1325, AS-B1, sidekick, 420EX, Kenko extenders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
evorgsumaf
Senior Member
Avatar
932 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: In Great Falls MT
     
May 07, 2009 16:25 |  #24

Jim Neiger wrote in post #7737628 (external link)
The above image was made using a 1D2N and a 500mm+1.4xTC+2xTC stacked, The wide open aperture was F11 and the effective focal length was 1720mm.


WOW 1720mm and a great shot.


Brandon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,915 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10108
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
May 07, 2009 16:34 |  #25

Jim's math is wrong,. it's 1,820mm !!! :shock: !!!


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
evorgsumaf
Senior Member
Avatar
932 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: In Great Falls MT
     
May 07, 2009 16:42 |  #26

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #7877974 (external link)
Jim's math is wrong,. it's 1,820mm !!! :shock: !!!


Good Laws!


Brandon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RikWriter
Goldmember
Avatar
4,010 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 1331
Joined May 2004
Location: Powell, WY
     
May 07, 2009 19:22 |  #27

Definitely not impossible, but it is like trying to see the world through a soda straw.


IMAGE: http://www.pbase.com/rikwriter/image/108207205.jpg

My pics:
www.pbase.com/rikwrite​r (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,915 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10108
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
May 08, 2009 11:19 |  #28

RikWriter wrote in post #7878853 (external link)
........like trying to see the world through a soda straw.

Quoted because it's so damn quotable!


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,259 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Question for 500mm f/4 users....
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1314 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.