Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 12 Apr 2009 (Sunday) 16:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

LR CPU vs RAM

 
briancmo
Senior Member
830 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Toronto
     
Apr 12, 2009 16:22 |  #1

I'm looking into buying a new laptop. Right now I'm runnig a XP32 on dual core 1.6 w/ 2 gigs of DDR2 667 RAM. I'm going to get vista 64 on my new machine and was wondering if it's more important to have

1) Core 2 Duo 2.0 with 4 gigs DDR3 1066

or

2) Core 2 Duo 2.4with 4 gigs DDR2 667

Unfortauntely I can't afford both.

What do you guys think?


Brian
CANON 5D, CANON XTI
24-70L, 430ex,
www.brianmosoff.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Apr 12, 2009 18:26 |  #2

DDR3 isn't worthwhile with a Core2 series CPU AFAIK, there's very little performance increase. Go for the faster CPU, and see if you can have it configured so you can upgrade to 8GB RAM later if you choose to.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scokar
Goldmember
Avatar
1,080 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
     
Apr 12, 2009 18:27 |  #3

I think the faster processor is the better choice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Colorblinded
Goldmember
Avatar
2,713 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 725
Joined Jul 2007
     
Apr 12, 2009 18:34 |  #4

I'd go with the second configuration as well but would probably just get DDR2 800 RAM myself.


http://www.colorblinde​dphoto.com (external link)
http://www.thecolorbli​ndphotographer.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MaxxuM
Goldmember
Avatar
3,361 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 22
Joined May 2007
Location: Rio Grande Valley
     
Apr 12, 2009 21:55 |  #5

#2 will be faster.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
unrlmth
Member
135 posts
Joined Feb 2009
     
Apr 12, 2009 22:03 |  #6

emorphien wrote in post #7716837 (external link)
I'd go with the second configuration as well but would probably just get DDR2 800 RAM myself.

DDR2 800 would be a waste of money. Just stick with the DDR2 667 and try and get 8 gigs. Its a laptop so it won't be overclocked, so he wont need the extra mem speed. Just changing the mem from 667 to 800 wont get you much in terms of real work performance gains.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FZ1
Senior Member
Avatar
801 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Cincinnati OH
     
Apr 12, 2009 22:12 |  #7

#2...that RAM still has plenty of bandwidth/speed for most apps. The new NVIDIA cards have CUDA which allows the GPU to assist on certain applications.


Joe

My equipment / Feedback / Info

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Colorblinded
Goldmember
Avatar
2,713 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 725
Joined Jul 2007
     
Apr 13, 2009 07:27 |  #8

unrlmth wrote in post #7717975 (external link)
DDR2 800 would be a waste of money. Just stick with the DDR2 667 and try and get 8 gigs. Its a laptop so it won't be overclocked, so he wont need the extra mem speed. Just changing the mem from 667 to 800 wont get you much in terms of real work performance gains.

The price different is usually minimal for 667 to 800, but for some reason I was thinking the FSB was 400MHz, it's not so the 667 would run 1:1 anyway.


http://www.colorblinde​dphoto.com (external link)
http://www.thecolorbli​ndphotographer.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gossioii3
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Mar 2009
     
Apr 17, 2009 05:43 as a reply to  @ Colorblinded's post |  #9

Good post

Good post! I plan to move into this stuff after I’m done with school, as most of it is time consuming. It’s a great post to reference back to. My blog needs more time to gain in popularity anyway.


wow gold (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
briancmo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
830 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Toronto
     
Apr 17, 2009 07:47 |  #10

So the FSB speed directly corralates to the speed of the ram. ie. if my new comp has a FSB at 1066 and I get DDR 3 ram at 1066, thatd better than a FSB at 1066 with ram at 800???

Whats Lcache mean?


Brian
CANON 5D, CANON XTI
24-70L, 430ex,
www.brianmosoff.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Apr 17, 2009 17:34 |  #11

RAM speeds are complex, I suggest googling and reading up on wikipedia. It's not always obvious how things work.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,365 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
LR CPU vs RAM
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1328 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.