Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 13 Apr 2009 (Monday) 21:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Before the aperture

 
Muuraija
Member
Avatar
186 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Where ever the ocean is
     
Apr 13, 2009 21:59 |  #1

I am looking at my lenses. They all have a 1 before the aperture. Correct me if I'm wrong: The f-stop numbers represent the biggest aperture at minimum and maximum zoom. I don't understand what the 1 signifies.
Example: 1:4-5.6


Push past the max...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,818 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
     
Apr 13, 2009 22:04 |  #2

In math the one is always assumed so "f/4" is the same as "f 1/4". The f-stop is based on the focal length, replacing the "f" in the aperture with the focal length. A 100mm lens with an aperture of f/4 has an aperture of "100 * 1/4" or "100/4" or 25mm.


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickr (external link)
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Muuraija
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
186 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Where ever the ocean is
     
Apr 13, 2009 22:20 |  #3

KRB, I understand what you're saying. I'm not sure if we talking about the same thing. The lens says: 70-300mm 1:4-5.6. Going by what you're saying, am I supposed to multiply the 1 in "70-300mm 1:4-5.6" by the focal lengths listed? I'm not sure what exactly that'll give me, besides the focal length.


Push past the max...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alt4852
Goldmember
Avatar
3,419 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
     
Apr 13, 2009 22:24 as a reply to  @ Muuraija's post |  #4

since your lens doesn't have a fixed aperture, you have to apply the focal length accordingly to what the maximum aperture is possible. ie: at 300mm on your lens, your maximum aperture would be f/5.6, or 300*1/5.6 or 300/5.6 meaning the aperture is roughly 54mm.


5D4 | Z21 | 35L2 | 50L | 85L2 | 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bjyoder
Goldmember
Avatar
1,664 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Central Ohio
     
Apr 13, 2009 22:25 |  #5

Muuraija wrote in post #7724782 (external link)
KRB, I understand what you're saying. I'm not sure if we talking about the same thing. The lens says: 70-300mm 1:4-5.6. Going by what you're saying, am I supposed to multiply the 1 in "70-300mm 1:4-5.6" by the focal lengths listed? I'm not sure what exactly that'll give me, besides the focal length.

Think of it like a ratio. 70:4. Divide that down until the most basic part, and you get:
70:4 --> 35:2 --> 17.5:1

At that point, you have the physical size of the aperture. So, at 70mm, the aperture is roughly 17.5mm. At 300mm (300:5.6), the aperture is roughly 53.6mm

This all gets weird with contemporary lens design, but that's where it all started, and why it's on your lens.

hth :)


Ben

500px (external link) | Website (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Muuraija
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
186 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Where ever the ocean is
     
Apr 13, 2009 22:27 |  #6

On the same page now! Thanks, everyone.


Push past the max...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Grentz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,874 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Midwest, USA
     
Apr 13, 2009 22:30 |  #7

Photography is all about math, whether or not you like it or use it :p

It gets complicated REALLY quick too.


Search.TechIslands.com (external link) - Photography Shopping Search Engine

www.TechIslands.com (external link) - News and Reviews

My Gear List - 60D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Muuraija
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
186 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Where ever the ocean is
     
Apr 13, 2009 22:37 |  #8

I am finding... After the explanations, things I learned back in the 9th grade are coming back to me. I was looking through a book and I found out that camera makes 100mm is 160mm. It doesn't outright say what the 1 is.


Push past the max...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brett
Goldmember
Avatar
4,176 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Ohio
     
Apr 13, 2009 23:22 |  #9

bjyoder wrote in post #7724813 (external link)
Think of it like a ratio.

That is exactly right. Ratios are expressed as a:b.

For instance, 1:2.8 on the lens means that you replace the one with the focal length to find the aperture size (the size of the actual iris opening), as has been said. When you see it expressed as f/2.8, it's telling you that very fact: the one is replaced by the focal length, represented by f.

An 85mm f/1.2 has a maximum aperture opening of 70.8mm, which is why the front element (and the lens itself) is large. An 18-55 3.5-5.6 has a maximum aperture opening at 55mm of just 9.82mm, which is why the front element (and thus, the lens) can be much smaller.

The camera in my avatar wears a Canon 50mm f/0.95, which has a maximum iris opening of 52.6mm, the largest aperture of any consumer 50mm ever produced (matched by a Leica 50/0.95).

:D



flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Madweasel
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,224 posts
Likes: 61
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Fareham, UK
     
Apr 14, 2009 05:59 |  #10

Brett wrote in post #7725112 (external link)
The camera in my avatar wears a Canon 50mm f/0.95, which has a maximum iris opening of 52.6mm, the largest aperture of any consumer 50mm ever produced (matched by a Leica 50/0.95).

:D

Nice. I know I'm going off-topic, but isn't it interesting that no-one else made such a fast lens in all that time (about 40 years) between the Canon Dream and the new Leica Noctilux?


Mark.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Apr 14, 2009 06:12 |  #11

Muuraija wrote in post #7724884 (external link)
I am finding... After the explanations, things I learned back in the 9th grade are coming back to me. I was looking through a book and I found out that camera makes 100mm is 160mm. It doesn't outright say what the 1 is.

The part that I bolded above is a very wrong interpretation of what you read.

What the book should have said is that the field (or angle) of view of a 100mm lens on an APS-C format camera (like a 40D or any of the Digital Rebel series) is equivalent to the field (or angle) of view of a 160mm lens on a 35mm film camera (or a so-called "full-frame" digital SLR).

This has absolutely nothing to do with the aperture values or the way they are represented.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Muuraija
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
186 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Where ever the ocean is
     
Apr 14, 2009 08:59 |  #12

SkipD wrote in post #7726384 (external link)
The part that I bolded above is a very wrong interpretation of what you read.

What the book should have said is that the field (or angle) of view of a 100mm lens on an APS-C format camera (like a 40D or any of the Digital Rebel series) is equivalent to the field (or angle) of view of a 160mm lens on a 35mm film camera (or a so-called "full-frame" digital SLR).

This has absolutely nothing to do with the aperture values or the way they are represented.

I understand. the point I was trying to make is that when the book refers to the focal length and aperture, it never addresses the 1. Just says on a crop body, the focal length of the lense should be fultiplied by the crop facture to get the focal length on a FF sensor...


Push past the max...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aram535
Goldmember
Avatar
1,915 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Apr 14, 2009 10:46 |  #13

Muuraija wrote in post #7727087 (external link)
I understand. the point I was trying to make is that when the book refers to the focal length and aperture, it never addresses the 1. Just says on a crop body, the focal length of the lense should be fultiplied by the crop facture to get the focal length on a FF sensor...

Look at it from a the lens's perspective.

The mm is just distance from the back element, that's a constant number no matter which body you put it on. Now how your body's sensor adjusts to that lens is a different story, but has nothing to do with the lens and focal length.

What changes is the ratio of sensor size to 35mm, nothing else.


Gear List * www.tranquilphotos.com (external link) * My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nureality
Goldmember
3,611 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2008
     
Apr 14, 2009 10:52 |  #14

Muuraija wrote in post #7724691 (external link)
I am looking at my lenses. They all have a 1 before the aperture. Correct me if I'm wrong: The f-stop numbers represent the biggest aperture at minimum and maximum zoom. I don't understand what the 1 signifies.
Example: 1:4-5.6

Its just one of the nomenclatures used by the various manufacturers to express the same info.

for example.

f/4 can be expressed several ways.

a) f/4
b) f4
c) 1:4

just know that on your lens which is a f/4-5.6, at some part of its range it will have a maximum aperature of f/4 (the wide end), at other parts of its aperature it will have f/5.6 (the long end), and in between these two ranges it will max out somewhere in the middle... generally f/4.5 and f/5.

do not confuse 1:4 with f1.4, they are not the same.

f/1.4 would be expressed as 1:1.4 in the "ratio" nomenclature.


Alan "NuReality" Fronshtein
Gear List | PBase |  (external link)flickr (external link)
Lots of Fun, Lots of Laughs, Happy Trigger Finger!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
egordon99
Cream of the Crop
10,247 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philly 'burbs
     
Apr 14, 2009 12:22 |  #15

nureality wrote in post #7727705 (external link)
do not confuse 1:4 with f1.4, they are not the same.

f/1.4 would be expressed as 1:1.4 in the "ratio" nomenclature.

There have been some CRAZY posts on PentaxForums.com over this very issue, and how it relates to the so-so SMC-A 50mm f/2 and the AMAZINGLY awesome SMC-A 50mm f/1.2 :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,894 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Before the aperture
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
614 guests, 120 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.