I am looking at my lenses. They all have a 1 before the aperture. Correct me if I'm wrong: The f-stop numbers represent the biggest aperture at minimum and maximum zoom. I don't understand what the 1 signifies.
Example: 1:4-5.6
Muuraija Member 186 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Where ever the ocean is More info | Apr 13, 2009 21:59 | #1 I am looking at my lenses. They all have a 1 before the aperture. Correct me if I'm wrong: The f-stop numbers represent the biggest aperture at minimum and maximum zoom. I don't understand what the 1 signifies. Push past the max...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
krb Cream of the Crop 8,818 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together More info | Apr 13, 2009 22:04 | #2 In math the one is always assumed so "f/4" is the same as "f 1/4". The f-stop is based on the focal length, replacing the "f" in the aperture with the focal length. A 100mm lens with an aperture of f/4 has an aperture of "100 * 1/4" or "100/4" or 25mm. -- Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 13, 2009 22:20 | #3 KRB, I understand what you're saying. I'm not sure if we talking about the same thing. The lens says: 70-300mm 1:4-5.6. Going by what you're saying, am I supposed to multiply the 1 in "70-300mm 1:4-5.6" by the focal lengths listed? I'm not sure what exactly that'll give me, besides the focal length. Push past the max...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alt4852 Goldmember 3,419 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Northern Virginia More info | since your lens doesn't have a fixed aperture, you have to apply the focal length accordingly to what the maximum aperture is possible. ie: at 300mm on your lens, your maximum aperture would be f/5.6, or 300*1/5.6 or 300/5.6 meaning the aperture is roughly 54mm. 5D4 | Z21 | 35L2 | 50L | 85L2 | 135L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bjyoder Goldmember 1,664 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Central Ohio More info | Apr 13, 2009 22:25 | #5 Muuraija wrote in post #7724782 KRB, I understand what you're saying. I'm not sure if we talking about the same thing. The lens says: 70-300mm 1:4-5.6. Going by what you're saying, am I supposed to multiply the 1 in "70-300mm 1:4-5.6" by the focal lengths listed? I'm not sure what exactly that'll give me, besides the focal length. Think of it like a ratio. 70:4. Divide that down until the most basic part, and you get:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 13, 2009 22:27 | #6 On the same page now! Thanks, everyone. Push past the max...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Grentz Goldmember 2,874 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Midwest, USA More info | Apr 13, 2009 22:30 | #7 Photography is all about math, whether or not you like it or use it Search.TechIslands.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 13, 2009 22:37 | #8 I am finding... After the explanations, things I learned back in the 9th grade are coming back to me. I was looking through a book and I found out that camera makes 100mm is 160mm. It doesn't outright say what the 1 is. Push past the max...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Brett Goldmember 4,176 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Ohio More info | Apr 13, 2009 23:22 | #9 bjyoder wrote in post #7724813 Think of it like a ratio. That is exactly right. Ratios are expressed as a:b.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Madweasel Cream of the Crop 6,224 posts Likes: 61 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Fareham, UK More info | Apr 14, 2009 05:59 | #10 Brett wrote in post #7725112 The camera in my avatar wears a Canon 50mm f/0.95, which has a maximum iris opening of 52.6mm, the largest aperture of any consumer 50mm ever produced (matched by a Leica 50/0.95). ![]() Nice. I know I'm going off-topic, but isn't it interesting that no-one else made such a fast lens in all that time (about 40 years) between the Canon Dream and the new Leica Noctilux? Mark.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop 20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | Apr 14, 2009 06:12 | #11 Muuraija wrote in post #7724884 I am finding... After the explanations, things I learned back in the 9th grade are coming back to me. I was looking through a book and I found out that camera makes 100mm is 160mm. It doesn't outright say what the 1 is. The part that I bolded above is a very wrong interpretation of what you read. Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 14, 2009 08:59 | #12 SkipD wrote in post #7726384 The part that I bolded above is a very wrong interpretation of what you read. What the book should have said is that the field (or angle) of view of a 100mm lens on an APS-C format camera (like a 40D or any of the Digital Rebel series) is equivalent to the field (or angle) of view of a 160mm lens on a 35mm film camera (or a so-called "full-frame" digital SLR). This has absolutely nothing to do with the aperture values or the way they are represented. I understand. the point I was trying to make is that when the book refers to the focal length and aperture, it never addresses the 1. Just says on a crop body, the focal length of the lense should be fultiplied by the crop facture to get the focal length on a FF sensor... Push past the max...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aram535 Goldmember 1,915 posts Joined Sep 2007 Location: Long Island, NY More info | Apr 14, 2009 10:46 | #13 Muuraija wrote in post #7727087 I understand. the point I was trying to make is that when the book refers to the focal length and aperture, it never addresses the 1. Just says on a crop body, the focal length of the lense should be fultiplied by the crop facture to get the focal length on a FF sensor... Look at it from a the lens's perspective. Gear List * www.tranquilphotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nureality Goldmember 3,611 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2008 More info | Apr 14, 2009 10:52 | #14 Muuraija wrote in post #7724691 I am looking at my lenses. They all have a 1 before the aperture. Correct me if I'm wrong: The f-stop numbers represent the biggest aperture at minimum and maximum zoom. I don't understand what the 1 signifies. Example: 1:4-5.6 Its just one of the nomenclatures used by the various manufacturers to express the same info. Alan "NuReality" Fronshtein
LOG IN TO REPLY |
egordon99 Cream of the Crop 10,247 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Philly 'burbs More info | Apr 14, 2009 12:22 | #15 nureality wrote in post #7727705 do not confuse 1:4 with f1.4, they are not the same. f/1.4 would be expressed as 1:1.4 in the "ratio" nomenclature. There have been some CRAZY posts on PentaxForums.com over this very issue, and how it relates to the so-so SMC-A 50mm f/2 and the AMAZINGLY awesome SMC-A 50mm f/1.2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 614 guests, 120 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||