Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 18 Apr 2009 (Saturday) 12:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Real estate photographers unite.

 
BIGTUFFGUY
Goldmember
Avatar
2,252 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Apr 18, 2009 12:28 |  #1

I've been shooting for a local agent and so far so good. I'd like to improve my skills though. If anyone can help me with pointers that would be great.

I've found two good sites for sample photos, I'd like to get close to their caliber.
http://www.tgrubbaphot​o.com/interiors.html (external link)
http://www.atticfire.c​om/ (external link)

My equipment is in my signature.


Gear List + Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BIGTUFFGUY
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,252 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Apr 18, 2009 13:02 |  #2

here are 2 photos I just took. Any help/ pointers would be appreciated.
The focal ppoint of this room is the shower. The colors are all off. even though I have a controlled light source... I'm lost.
5d- 17-40 @ 17mm about 5 1/2 feet high on tripod.

IMAGE: http://i42.tinypic.com/2v33iv5.jpg
IMAGE: http://i40.tinypic.com/2ujni1h.jpg

Gear List + Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kitacanon
Goldmember
4,706 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2006
Location: West Palm Beach
     
Apr 18, 2009 15:47 |  #3

Shooting RAW? If not, you should...more control of WB available in DPP


My Canon kit 450D/s90; Canon lenses 18-55 IS, 70-210/3.5-4.5....Nikon kit: D610; 28-105/3.5-4.5, 75-300/4.5-5.6 AF, 50/1.8D Nikkors, Tamron 80-210; MF Nikkors: 50/2K, 50/1.4 AI-S, 50/1.8 SeriesE, 60/2.8 Micro Nikkor (AF locked), 85mm/1.8K-AI, 105/2.5 AIS/P.C, 135/2.8K/Q.C, 180/2.8 ED, 200/4Q/AIS, 300/4.5H-AI, ++ Tamron 70-210/3.8-4, Vivitar/Kiron 28/2, ser.1 70-210/3.5, ser.1 28-90; Vivitar/Komine and Samyang 28/2.8; 35mm Nikon F/FM/FE2, Rebel 2K...HTC RE UWA camera

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
C2S
Senior Member
Avatar
303 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Oulu, Finland
     
Apr 18, 2009 16:01 |  #4

Straighten the verticals as well, either by:

A) purchasing a tilt-shift lens (expensive, but should pay itself back over time)
B) fixing in post-processing (causes a slight loss of image area and sharpness due to pixel distortion)


EOS 500D | Sigma 10-20mm EX | EF-S 18-55mm IS | EF 50mm f/1.8 II | Sigma 70-300mm macro | Tripod | CPL | 25% GND | 0.2% ND | Canon RC-1 | 430EX Speedlite

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kitacanon
Goldmember
4,706 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2006
Location: West Palm Beach
     
Apr 18, 2009 16:26 |  #5

C2S wrote in post #7756909 (external link)
Straighten the verticals as well, either by:

A) purchasing a tilt-shift lens (expensive, but should pay itself back over time)
B) fixing in post-processing (causes a slight loss of image area and sharpness due to pixel distortion)

I kinda like the 2nd shot's AoV, though the tripod (light-stand?) leg showing a the left is a bit sloppy...easy to overlook as I've done that myself...:oops:


My Canon kit 450D/s90; Canon lenses 18-55 IS, 70-210/3.5-4.5....Nikon kit: D610; 28-105/3.5-4.5, 75-300/4.5-5.6 AF, 50/1.8D Nikkors, Tamron 80-210; MF Nikkors: 50/2K, 50/1.4 AI-S, 50/1.8 SeriesE, 60/2.8 Micro Nikkor (AF locked), 85mm/1.8K-AI, 105/2.5 AIS/P.C, 135/2.8K/Q.C, 180/2.8 ED, 200/4Q/AIS, 300/4.5H-AI, ++ Tamron 70-210/3.8-4, Vivitar/Kiron 28/2, ser.1 70-210/3.5, ser.1 28-90; Vivitar/Komine and Samyang 28/2.8; 35mm Nikon F/FM/FE2, Rebel 2K...HTC RE UWA camera

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Grimes
Goldmember
1,323 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2006
     
Apr 18, 2009 16:56 |  #6

I actually thought that they were pretty good. I would have removed the cleaning bottles in the shower more than anything. They distract a person's attention a lot.


Alex
5DMKII | 85 f/1.8 | 17-40L f/4 | 24-105 f/4 IS | 40 f/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kitacanon
Goldmember
4,706 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2006
Location: West Palm Beach
     
Apr 18, 2009 21:14 |  #7

Grimes wrote in post #7757155 (external link)
I would have removed the cleaning bottles in the shower more than anything. They distract a person's attention a lot.

Definitely...


My Canon kit 450D/s90; Canon lenses 18-55 IS, 70-210/3.5-4.5....Nikon kit: D610; 28-105/3.5-4.5, 75-300/4.5-5.6 AF, 50/1.8D Nikkors, Tamron 80-210; MF Nikkors: 50/2K, 50/1.4 AI-S, 50/1.8 SeriesE, 60/2.8 Micro Nikkor (AF locked), 85mm/1.8K-AI, 105/2.5 AIS/P.C, 135/2.8K/Q.C, 180/2.8 ED, 200/4Q/AIS, 300/4.5H-AI, ++ Tamron 70-210/3.8-4, Vivitar/Kiron 28/2, ser.1 70-210/3.5, ser.1 28-90; Vivitar/Komine and Samyang 28/2.8; 35mm Nikon F/FM/FE2, Rebel 2K...HTC RE UWA camera

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
breal101
Goldmember
2,724 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Aug 2006
     
Apr 18, 2009 21:38 |  #8

C2S wrote in post #7756909 (external link)
Straighten the verticals as well, either by:

A) purchasing a tilt-shift lens (expensive, but should pay itself back over time)
B) fixing in post-processing (causes a slight loss of image area and sharpness due to pixel distortion)

Or
C) Use a lower angle and keep the camera level.

The bucket next to the toilet needs to go too. Shooting RAW will be a big help with the WB problem.

Atticfire is a great group of photographers, by the look of the site they probably don't shoot cheap, real estate people generally are too cheap to pay their rates. If they do it's for extremely high end properties.


"Try to go out empty and let your images fill you up." Jay Maisel

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BIGTUFFGUY
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,252 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Apr 18, 2009 23:37 |  #9

thanks all for your comments. This is actually the basement bathroom that i'm in the process of finishing. I wanted to practice so I shot it.
I only saw the tripod leg afterwards. As for the shampoo et all, i didnt bother moving it.

I was hoping for feedback on the angles, height and so on. How someone else would have shot this space.

I am shooting RAW


Gear List + Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MG30D
Senior Member
821 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Apr 18, 2009 23:58 as a reply to  @ BIGTUFFGUY's post |  #10

As to the two links, in particular atticfire, they're reorganize the room, then they are using tons of external strobes hidden and bounced through out the room, then they probably combine exposures (but not typical hdr), and then they do some heavy processing.

I could not tell you how to do this, but from what I've read you need several flashes to light a room in a way similar to the results you see at tgrubbaphoto.com


https://photography-on-the.net …?p=7819436&post​count=1777

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BIGTUFFGUY
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,252 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Apr 19, 2009 00:01 |  #11

I reshot the room. Of course I had to get the stuff I moved to the other side in the reflection in the glass. Please disregard that. I think i did better with the WB. however it's not true to the room. IE the drawers are white IRL. the photos looked too cold with proper WB
1

IMAGE: http://i44.tinypic.com/bjj24i.jpg
2
IMAGE: http://i40.tinypic.com/2502yr9.jpg
3. I find it opens the room up, but darkens it.(photo taken at 1am though, no available sunlight)
IMAGE: http://i39.tinypic.com/15ge1dx.jpg
4. Closes the room however it makes it look warmer.
IMAGE: http://i41.tinypic.com/1ox4s3.jpg

Gear List + Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
breal101
Goldmember
2,724 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Aug 2006
     
Apr 19, 2009 00:18 |  #12

I can only suggest that you look at the sites in the links you posted. The vertical lines are straight because the camera is level, if you want to shoot from such a high angle you need a TS-E lens. You can get straight lines with the lens you have but you have to lower the camera. Is your monitor calibrated? They still look too warm.


"Try to go out empty and let your images fill you up." Jay Maisel

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BIGTUFFGUY
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,252 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Apr 19, 2009 00:27 |  #13

These photos accurately represent the colours in the room. (or as close as i'll get)
Thanks, I'll look into the Tilt shift lens.
if you have another resource for me to read and learn from that would be great.

IMAGE: http://i41.tinypic.com/35ko7bm.jpg
IMAGE: http://i40.tinypic.com/zy7hqd.jpg
IMAGE: http://i44.tinypic.com/bfqng5.jpg

Gear List + Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
harroz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,749 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: New Zealand
     
Apr 19, 2009 00:40 |  #14

here's another:

http://photographyforr​ealestate.net/ (external link)

my suggestion would be to shoot straight, with straight lines. and in that particular bathroom I would have removed everything accept for the big white vase, then moved the vase to the centre of the vanity top between wall and sink. and move everything that is being reflected in the shower glass.



blog (external link) weddings (external link) commercial (external link) mm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
breal101
Goldmember
2,724 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Aug 2006
     
Apr 19, 2009 00:43 |  #15

Part of the problem is a profile mismatch I think, it should be sRGB for web. You don't really need a TS-E if you bring the camera down a bit and level it off. The equivalent to the FOV you have now, the 17mm TS-E is over 2 grand.:shock:


"Try to go out empty and let your images fill you up." Jay Maisel

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,965 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Real estate photographers unite.
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1395 guests, 172 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.