I've read that a 1.4 x teleconverter isn't a very good idea on anything less than 300mm.
I'm assuming the loss of IQ isn't worth the extra reach. My only lens is the 24-105. Anyone have an opinion on this?
Thanks!
Apr 20, 2009 12:20 | #1 I've read that a 1.4 x teleconverter isn't a very good idea on anything less than 300mm. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KarlJohnston Cream of the Crop 9,334 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2008 More info | Apr 20, 2009 12:24 | #2  Permanent banI don't think a teleconverter works on that lens Adventurous Photographer, Writer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 20, 2009 12:27 | #3 Sorry, I missed the Sticky. I'll do my homework... Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop  39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Apr 20, 2009 13:01 | #4 The Canon TC won't work on it. A Kenko might fit. "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
XJS999 Member 75 posts Joined Apr 2008 More info | Apr 20, 2009 13:14 | #5 René Damkot wrote in post #7768363  The Canon TC won't work on it. A Kenko might fit. Yep, Kenko's work (Pro 300 DG) on my 40D. 40D, 70-200 F2.8L, 24-105 F4L, 50 1.4, Sigma 10-20, Kenko Pro 300DG 1.4x, Calumet Genesis 200 (2), OLY FL36, 285HV (2), CTR-301P, Benro
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1365 guests, 177 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
