70-200 2.8 IS + Micro Adjustment....

I bought this lens about two weeks ago and sent it back to B&H because I thought it was too soft at F2.8. I got the new copy today. Here are some test shots.

Also, what's with the cool colors on the top of the sharp focus and the warm colors on the bottom of the focal point?

I also micro adjusted the lens on my 50D backword to plus 8. It seems hit or miss about half an inch all the way through the lens, but pretty good at 200mm.

Are these images sharp in your opinion?

Follow this link to my flickr to see all images full size (http://www.flickr.com …s/sets/72157623​536604337/).

200mm F2.8

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

newb2pro_1day_or_so wrote in post #9871628
I bought this lens about two weeks ago and sent it back to B&H because I thought it was too soft at F2.8. I got the new copy today. Here are some test shots.

Also, what's with the cool colors on the top of the sharp focus and the warm colors on the bottom of the focal point?

I also micro adjusted the lens on my 50D backword to plus 8. It seems hit or miss about half an inch all the way through the lens, but pretty good at 200mm.

Are these images sharp in your opinion?

Follow this link to my flickr to see all images full size (http://www.flickr.com …s/sets/72157623​536604337/).

200mm F2.8

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

200mm F4

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

155mm F2.8

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

I'm getting totally confused now - what point were you focusing on?

The 12" Marker.