B&H
is showing them in stock. Has anyone taken the plunge yet? 
Jim
JimHoltz Senior Member 452 posts Joined Apr 2008 Location: Des Moines, Iowa More info | Apr 21, 2009 22:04 | #1 |
5spdfrk Member 66 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: ATL More info | Apr 27, 2009 14:40 | #2 Apparently someone has because they're now out-of-stock. Someone post some reviews already!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 27, 2009 14:56 | #3 5spdfrk wrote in post #7813634 Apparently someone has because they're now out-of-stock. Someone post some reviews already! I'm looking forward to seeing pictures and reading reviews too! There was a post at another forum with LINK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
5spdfrk Member 66 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: ATL More info | Apr 27, 2009 15:45 | #4 Well, iirc there are some German guys on this site, so maybe they could translate for us or something.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hammmerhead Senior Member 312 posts Joined Feb 2009 Location: The hills of the Ozarks More info | With Canon and Nikon 18-200's having certain downfalls, I cant see Sigma picking up 50mm and increasing IQ. Maybe they can build them close in IQ and that will be a plus. _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HERE
LOG IN TO REPLY |
5spdfrk Member 66 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: ATL More info | Apr 28, 2009 11:30 | #7 Nice find Jim! I'll have to take a closer look at those later.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kgarvelink Mostly Lurking 19 posts Joined Apr 2009 More info | Apr 28, 2009 13:28 | #8 I have taken the "plunge." I was anxiously awaiting some reviews of this lens also. I walked into my local dealers store, and lo and behold, he had just got some in. I dropped in onto my 40d body at the store, and was impressed..so I walked out with it. Canon 40D gripped|Canon 70-200L|Canon 85mm 1.8|Sigma 80-400 OS|Tamron 17-50mm 2.8|Tamron 90mm 1:1 2.8|Sigma 18-250mm OS|3 Canon 430 EX II|Canon 580 EXII|Cybersync triggers|Manfrotto PROB tripod|Manfrotto ballhead|Manfrotto 679B Monopod|Vanguard SBH-100 ballhead|Interfit & Flashpoint strobes|ColorRight White Balance Filter|
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 28, 2009 13:46 | #9 kgarvelink wrote in post #7819932 I have taken the "plunge." I was anxiously awaiting some reviews of this lens also. I walked into my local dealers store, and lo and behold, he had just got some in. I dropped in onto my 40d body at the store, and was impressed..so I walked out with it. From what I see so far, the lens exceeds my expectations. Understand my expectations were reasonable given this lens range-I did not expect to compare IQ to some of my other images. So far, I have been pleasantly surprised. The AF is fast and quiet. The OS is exceptional...smooth, very little jumping around, and also quiet. I have not done anything serious with the lens yet, but I have shot about 200 handheld just checking it out. I am able to get acceptable sharpness cranked out to 250 on a 1.6 body handheld without running the ISO up very high. Colors, contrast and saturation are also very good. In summary, from I see so far, I am impressed. Better than what I had expected from a lens with this range. Excellent! Can you post a link to some images?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AlexinS.A. Member 127 posts Joined May 2008 Location: Cape Town, South Africa. More info | May 03, 2009 00:54 | #10 I too am very keen on this lens and would like to see some shots taken with it. I had the Sigma 18-200 OS in the past but sold it. Not because I was unhappy with it. It did what I expected but I needed the money at the time to buy another lens. Alex Bond-Smith, Cape Town,South Africa. Canon 50D.Website http://www.alexbondsmithphotography.co.za/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AngryCorgi -Bouncing Boy- a POTN peion 11,547 posts Likes: 7 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Surrounded by bunnies, squirrels and a couple of crazy corgis in NoVA... More info | May 27, 2009 11:53 | #11 You can check gizmodo.com for a "review/rant" about the lens. It's hardly a review, though, and sounds more like vague opinions of a person who has just started shooting DSLRs. The opinions are general and there are no fine details in regard to the performance of the lens. They have some very poorly shot samples at low res, so that just reinforces the weakness of the article. AngryCorgi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 926 guests, 179 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||