... Close. 4AM, we were meant to meet at 5.30am there with the MUA and start shooting 6.30 on the dot.
What was her excuse ??
"Just burrrp got hic home" ?
Austen.

charlieharper Goldmember 1,583 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: South Australia More info | Sep 13, 2009 00:37 | #9796 ed. wrote in post #8634506 ... Close. 4AM, we were meant to meet at 5.30am there with the MUA and start shooting 6.30 on the dot. What was her excuse ??
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tangcla Cream of the Crop 9,779 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Sep 13, 2009 00:40 | #9797 The MUA isn't bad lookin anyway Clarence
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ed. Goldmember 2,978 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: 2114.syd.nsw.au More info | Sep 13, 2009 00:40 | #9798 Close... she had a 'killer headache' aka "I'm hungover still" http://www.edwardhor.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Collin85 Cream of the Crop 8,164 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Sydney/Beijing More info | Sep 13, 2009 00:43 | #9799 ed. wrote in post #8634506 How much? $750? Ugh, you know I'm selling the IS version right? Col | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ed. Goldmember 2,978 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: 2114.syd.nsw.au More info | Sep 13, 2009 00:48 | #9800 Oh... 700 then? http://www.edwardhor.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fungry Goldmember 2,225 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Sydney/Shanghai More info | Sep 13, 2009 00:51 | #9801 Man... I was pumped for it and when I got the message, *CRASH*. Ed - Gear List - www.edkhou.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DAdeGroot Goldmember 4,512 posts Joined Mar 2007 Location: Cedar Creek, Qld, Australia More info | wardie wrote in post #8632950 Looks real good Dave
Thanks Guys Collin85 wrote in post #8634315 Nope, I actually prefer my 85mm or 17-55 at 55mm. Part of the problem is I find the FL rather strange on APS-C. I have a feeling the lens will become far more useful once I get a 5D II.. so that's why I'm still not sure if I'm gonna sell it or not. Many here know how I felt about selling the 35L.. what a mistake that was. ![]() The 70-200 is a whole new lens on a 5D (or any FF body). 70mm is actually useful, and 200 is beautiful for head and shoulders portraits with smooth background. I don't have an 85/1.2L, but would use that in conjunction with my 70-200/2.8 for portraits. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ANGUS THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 6,897 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Sydney, Australia... More info | Sep 13, 2009 03:56 | #9803 Where abouts in town are the Melbournites from? Im moving to St Kilda and hardly know the area thus far. Angus
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fungry Goldmember 2,225 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Sydney/Shanghai More info | Sep 13, 2009 04:16 | #9804 ANGUS wrote in post #8634945 Where abouts in town are the Melbournites from? Im moving to St Kilda and hardly know the area thus far. When are you moving to Melbourne? St. Kilda is a nice area. There is a nice patisserie/chocolate shop there (Cacao) Ed - Gear List - www.edkhou.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark Dammit I need sleep 3,386 posts Joined May 2008 Location: Perth, Australia More info | Sep 13, 2009 04:51 | #9805 I wonder how possible it would be to change my 70-200 2.8 IS into a 70-200 4 IS and some primes in that range... Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark Dammit I need sleep 3,386 posts Joined May 2008 Location: Perth, Australia More info | Sep 13, 2009 04:52 | #9806 Actually you know what I use that whole range at 2.8 too much for that to really work... Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Collin85 Cream of the Crop 8,164 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Sydney/Beijing More info | Sep 13, 2009 05:16 | #9807 DAdeGroot wrote in post #8634818 The 70-200 is a whole new lens on a 5D (or any FF body). 70mm is actually useful, and 200 is beautiful for head and shoulders portraits with smooth background. I don't have an 85/1.2L, but would use that in conjunction with my 70-200/2.8 for portraits. Yeah, that's what I suspected. I guess I should hang onto that 70-200 until I see what it's like on the 5D II. Right now.. I don't really use it much. At all! Col | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tangcla Cream of the Crop 9,779 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Sep 13, 2009 05:23 | #9808 f/2.8 ftw! Clarence
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fungry Goldmember 2,225 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Sydney/Shanghai More info | Sep 13, 2009 05:27 | #9809 -_-. Ed - Gear List - www.edkhou.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NicD Goldmember 1,588 posts Joined Apr 2008 Location: Adelaide, South Australia More info | Sep 13, 2009 05:29 | #9810 Collin85 wrote in post #8635071 Yeah, that's what I suspected. I guess I should hang onto that 70-200 until I see what it's like on the 5D II. Right now.. I don't really use it much. At all! Your welcome to lend it to me til the 5DmkII comes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1832 guests, 117 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||