Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 28 Apr 2009 (Tuesday) 20:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Hopefully a less boring duck picture...

 
melindac
Member
31 posts
Joined Aug 2008
     
Apr 28, 2009 20:26 |  #1

Unfortunately, I know I cut off the right tip of the duck's wing. Aside from that what other critiques do you have about this picture?

Here are the settings:
Focal length: 200 m
Exposure time: 1/2000
ISO: 100
Aperature: f/2.8

Thanks in advance!

IMAGE: http://lh4.ggpht.com/_z5C-Yc-BZ5Y/SfensWYfa9I/AAAAAAAAAMk/xqAO-3wTuBQ/s800/IMG_3729.JPG
IMAGE LINK: http://picasaweb.googl​e.com …SWOYspg?feat=em​bedwebsite  (external link)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RMXSeven
Senior Member
Avatar
310 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Australia, Sydney
     
Apr 28, 2009 20:43 |  #2

Hey There,

Nice timing with this shot!!!
The focal point looks a little off to me.
@F/2.8 it looks like the focal point needs to be a little closer to you so that from the ducks bill, all the way to the wing tips are in focus.
The wings edges are super in focus and look great!
My eye gets a little distracted by the foreground water too.

I am a n00b though!

Keep up the good work!

Ronen


Canon 40D | EFs 10-22 | EFs 17-85 | Sigma 70-300 APO | EF 50mm Fantastic Plastic
FujiFilm X-E1 (Sexy One)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DerekSimon
Senior Member
736 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Cleveland, OH
     
Apr 28, 2009 23:42 |  #3

I agree maybe a different f-stop would add to this shot... Is the duck in your swimming pool?


www.dereksimon.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
melindac
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
31 posts
Joined Aug 2008
     
Apr 29, 2009 06:06 as a reply to  @ DerekSimon's post |  #4

Thanks for all the responses. I will try a higher f-stop next time.

The duck flew into the swimming pool at the hotel I was staying at. =)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Broncobear
Goldmember
Avatar
2,415 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Ottawa Ontario Canada
     
Apr 29, 2009 07:06 |  #5

I would say 2.8 is too wide on 200mm for birds, when i shoot at 400 i shot at basically f8. So at least f4 for 200mm maybe even 5 or 5.6


"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes, but in having new eyes." " (external link)Marcel Proust (external link)

Gear& Frank's Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonydee
Goldmember
Avatar
2,009 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Tokyo
     
Apr 29, 2009 16:14 |  #6

Other than the soft head, it certainly lives up to its billing... the benefits of having lights and higher reflectivity under the water - looks great! Cheers, Tony


5D and too much glass. Mamiya 645E.
http://www.picasaweb.c​om/anthonypon (external link) recent work

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
melindac
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
31 posts
Joined Aug 2008
     
May 01, 2009 23:27 as a reply to  @ tonydee's post |  #7

Thanks for all the comments and suggestions!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,031 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Hopefully a less boring duck picture...
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2693 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.