Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 18 Apr 2005 (Monday) 19:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Go Shoot the Moon!!!

 
jyrgen
Senior Member
Avatar
259 posts
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Estonia
     
Apr 19, 2005 00:17 as a reply to  @ post 503308 |  #16

Here is mine from few days ago, with some converters'n'stuff. Almost full frame.

10D + Kenko 1.5x + Sigma 1.4x + Sigma 2x + 100-400@360, aperture closed down 2 stops

IMAGE: http://www.hot.ee/jyrgen/050416_1302.jpg

I took some more yesterday, when I received a Minolta VN Angle Finder, which makes focusing that much easier. Plus, it's funny to watch thru it how quickly the Moon actually travels. When trying closer apertures I quickly ran into motion blur issues, and my panning skills just didn't cut it yet ;-)a

Will process the shots today and post if anything better comes out.

Canon 35/1.4 | Canon 50/1.4 | Canon 135/2 | Canon 17-40/4 | Canon 24-105/4 | Canon 70-300/4.5-5.6
Canon 5D | Canon Speedlite 430EX | Manfrotto 055 ProB + 488RC2 | Kenko ext tubes & 1.4x TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
felix21685
Goldmember
Avatar
1,371 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Arizona
     
Apr 19, 2005 02:34 |  #17

hey jyrgen,

you really had 3 teleconverters on the camera at the same time? that would be crazy..makes sense though i guess..

so if i was to take a picture of hte moon with a 2x teleconverter and a 300mm lense on an XT. i would focus etc..then see what the camera spits up for exposure and make it 2 stops (more closed) on the aperature? is that even close ? :)


---------------
50D, Rebel XT, EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS, 28-135 IS,430EX, AT858
Everything you wanted to know about aftermarket batteries

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Apr 19, 2005 02:44 as a reply to  @ felix21685's post |  #18

felix21685 wrote:
so if i was to take a picture of hte moon with a 2x teleconverter and a 300mm lense on an XT. i would focus etc..then see what the camera spits up for exposure and make it 2 stops (more closed) on the aperature? is that even close ? :)

That's just a starting point - try it yourself and use your histogram! :)


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jyrgen
Senior Member
Avatar
259 posts
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Estonia
     
Apr 19, 2005 02:48 |  #19

Hi Felix,

I just stopped down the aperture to partially compensate the presumably huge quality loss from using (a lot of) TC-s. You don't have to. I have wide open shots too from yesterday. Since the Moon filled most of the frame, I used autoexposure, but compensated to the right to get as much information as possible, and then pulled back in post processing. I shot in daylight btw.


Canon 35/1.4 | Canon 50/1.4 | Canon 135/2 | Canon 17-40/4 | Canon 24-105/4 | Canon 70-300/4.5-5.6
Canon 5D | Canon Speedlite 430EX | Manfrotto 055 ProB + 488RC2 | Kenko ext tubes & 1.4x TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
foxbat
Goldmember
Avatar
2,432 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Essex, UK.
     
Apr 19, 2005 02:50 |  #20

Here's mine from a while ago:

IMAGE: http://www.aprd31.dsl.pipex.com/nature/moon1.jpg

originally posted here:

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=63924

Andy Brown; South-east England. Canon, Sigma, Leica, Zeiss all on Canon DSLRs. My hacking blog (external link).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
foxbat
Goldmember
Avatar
2,432 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Essex, UK.
     
Apr 19, 2005 02:54 as a reply to  @ jyrgen's post |  #21

jyrgen wrote:
Plus, it's funny to watch thru it how quickly the Moon actually travels. When trying closer apertures I quickly ran into motion blur issues, and my panning skills just didn't cut it yet

So that's what it is, I thought my ball head was creeping and I had it so tight my wrists hurt from the effort!


Andy Brown; South-east England. Canon, Sigma, Leica, Zeiss all on Canon DSLRs. My hacking blog (external link).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
steibeldj
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
188 posts
Joined Mar 2005
     
Apr 19, 2005 09:56 as a reply to  @ foxbat's post |  #22

foxbat wrote:
Here's mine from a while ago:

QUOTED IMAGE

originally posted here:

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=63924

Ok, how did you do it? Tripod? Settings? converter? That blows mine away!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
steibeldj
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
188 posts
Joined Mar 2005
     
Apr 19, 2005 10:01 as a reply to  @ jyrgen's post |  #23

jyrgen wrote:
Here is mine from few days ago, with some converters'n'stuff. Almost full frame.

10D + Kenko 1.5x + Sigma 1.4x + Sigma 2x + 100-400@360, aperture closed down 2 stops

QUOTED IMAGE

I took some more yesterday, when I received a Minolta VN Angle Finder, which makes focusing that much easier. Plus, it's funny to watch thru it how quickly the Moon actually travels. When trying closer apertures I quickly ran into motion blur issues, and my panning skills just didn't cut it yet ;-)a

Will process the shots today and post if anything better comes out.

I did not know you could stack teleconverters.

I've seen the moon moving in a telescope, so I guess that's what you created. It was manual focus right? And just what is Minolta VN Angle Finder?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
griff2
Senior Member
Avatar
266 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, UK
     
Apr 19, 2005 10:04 as a reply to  @ steibeldj's post |  #24

jyrgen wrote:

10D + Kenko 1.5x + Sigma 1.4x + Sigma 2x + 100-400@360, aperture closed down 2 stops

Wow, that's the equivalent of a 2688mm lens:shock:, a gust of wind would probably have caused motion blur, but at that huge magnification, you'd certainly notice the relative motion of the moon and earth:shock:


griff2;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mycroft
Senior Member
Avatar
358 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB Canada
     
Apr 19, 2005 11:20 |  #25

Shot a few nights ago on my way home from work, 75-300 non-IS, handheld, 1/160s, f9, ISO800


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Canon EOS 40D w/BG-E2, EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, EF 24-70 f/2.8L USM, Sigma AF 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX HSM, Canon Speedlite 580EX, Manfrotto 055CB tripod w/486RC2 clone ballhead, Opus OPL-M100 strobe w/45" shoothrough umbrella, Lightrein LR4A strobe w/24"x34" softbox
GEAR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lost
Goldmember
Avatar
1,009 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Houma, LA
     
Apr 19, 2005 11:22 as a reply to  @ Mycroft's post |  #26

Man!!!!! I was so thrown by the title. I was already surveying my gun collection to figure out what I had that could reach that far.

Plenty of good pics here.


Canon 7D
Canon EF 100-400L - Sigma EF 24-70 2.8 EX DG Macro Canon EF 50mm 1.8 - 580 EX

"Its all fun and games till the rent check bounces." Lost

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
foxbat
Goldmember
Avatar
2,432 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Essex, UK.
     
Apr 19, 2005 11:23 as a reply to  @ steibeldj's post |  #27

steibeldj wrote:
Ok, how did you do it? Tripod? Settings? converter? That blows mine away!

I was using the 400mm f/5.6L on the 300D. Exposure was 1/320s at f/5.6 ISO 200. I used a tripod with a remote shutter release.

lost wrote:
Man!!!!! I was so thrown by the title. I was already surveying my gun collection to figure out what I had that could reach that far.

Remind me not to disagree with any of your posts!:lol:


Andy Brown; South-east England. Canon, Sigma, Leica, Zeiss all on Canon DSLRs. My hacking blog (external link).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
steibeldj
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
188 posts
Joined Mar 2005
     
Apr 19, 2005 15:13 as a reply to  @ Mycroft's post |  #28

Mycroft wrote:
Shot a few nights ago on my way home from work, 75-300 non-IS, handheld, 1/160s, f9, ISO800

Handheld huh? You must have a steadier hand or a much better copy of the 75-300 than me.:eek:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Chazs
Senior Member
515 posts
Joined Aug 2002
Location: NW Washington
     
Apr 19, 2005 22:58 |  #29

Nice shots all. This isn't much of a "great" moon shot, but I was curious what the 50mm f/1.4 could do. This is hand held at 1/1250s F2.8, and MAJOR cropped. Not bad for an itty bitty image.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ron ­ chappel
Cream of the Crop
Honorary Moderator
Avatar
3,554 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Qld ,Australia
     
Apr 20, 2005 04:22 as a reply to  @ Chazs's post |  #30

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


Shot with the 75-300 IS and cropped to actual pixels.This is the best of many tries (allthough they didn't vary much) then sharpened abit

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO



This one is a similar thing from an el-cheapo 500mm lens -lots of pics taken and the best image worked on to get it looking it's best



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

16,969 views & 0 likes for this thread, 41 members have posted to it.
Go Shoot the Moon!!!
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is xrhstaras23
1766 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.