Hi,
My first post having just joined so hope I get things right! I used to do a lot of amateur photography and owned a Canon EOS 650 (I think that's what it was - one of the early AF 35mm film SLR's). In recent years I've been doing less photography and just using compacts - Canon IXUS 75 now - for family events etc but I am now looking at doing a lot more having experienced my son's 40D with envy and with time to pursue my hobbies having taken early retirement!!!
I was leaning towards a 450D but wondered about a 500D mainly due to the video option. I know many people don't rate it but I only do a bit of video (holidays etc) using a fairly basic Sony Mini DV (DCR-HC35) so my questions are:
Would the video facility of the 500D be an adequate (or worse) replacement for my Mini DV, i.e. just for occasional use a few times a year. If the video quality was a lot worse then I probably wouldn't bother.
Lenses - rather than consider the 'basic' Canon 2-lens pack I would prefer just one lens so any views on the 18-200+ offerings from Canon, Sigma and Tamron would be appreciated please. I like the look of the Tamron AF 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC LD Aspherical lens but have seen mixed reviews on this site.
So I thought the 450D with the Tamron would be a decent combination and within budget but I'm wavering on the 500D / Tamron which I could just about budget for.
Main interests would be holidays, landscapes and motorsports.
Hope this makes sense - any views appreciated, thanks. Gary

