Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 03 May 2009 (Sunday) 03:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

IDE vs AHCI with XP32

 
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
May 03, 2009 03:46 |  #1

I just reinstalled XP, as my old install was getting flakey - I have two installs now, on different disks. I have an Asus P5Q SE and Seagate barracuda disks, the only way I could get Windows to recognise the disk was by telling the BIOS to make it look like an IDE disk. My old windows install worked fine on AHCI mode.

After a little reading I discovered that if you want to run in AHCI mode you have to supply the XP install a driver disk before installing windows. There is a way to add that driver later, but it's a little tricky. Also there's debate about whether AHCI is worthwhile or not.

Does anyone have an opinion on whether I should go to the trouble of trying to get AHCI working on my new XP install?


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Moppie
Moderator
Avatar
15,103 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 452
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Akarana, Aotearoa. (Kiwiland)
     
May 03, 2009 04:04 |  #2

I'm running my Vista instal in IDE mode because I stuffed up when I first did the build.

In theory AHCI is better, it allows how swaping of SATA drives through eSATA and is supposed to speed HDD access.

I did a bit of reasurch about the differences though and it seems that the performance difference isn't really that much, so small that most people won't notice it.



So long and thanks for all the flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
May 03, 2009 04:54 |  #3

Hot swapping would be nice, but I could never get that going on my current windows install - though I did change motherboards after the XP install so that could've caused problems. I think NCQ only works under AHCI, and all my drives support NCQ, but still what little i've read also suggests performance is very similar.

I guess i'll stick with IDE, just because it sounds easier. Now's the time to change though, all i've done is install XP and all the updates, which took an entire evening. I have a ghost image now though, so hopefully I don't have to do it again.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Faolan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,204 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 137
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Scotland
     
May 03, 2009 12:41 |  #4

AHCI can introduce headaches with XP especially if you ever need to repair the drive. It's generally the recommendation to disable it if you can when using XP. Vista isn't much better either but at least it has AHCI support natively.

As noted most of the features aren't needed by the majority of people.

However, AHCI does introduce some nice features if your HD supports them like advance power saving modes, NCQ (Native Command Queueing) and hot swapping. There other advantages but those the three main features. Another feature is increased bandwidth but that's highly variable as AHCI on some controllers and/or HDs can actually throttle your bandwidth!

AHCI being enabled with opticial drives can lead to interesting faults as well.


Some call me the Heilan' Laddie, but others call me Rob.
Flickr (external link) - Lighting set ups using Canon Flash/Elinchrom plus some general work.
Celtic Shadows Design (external link) - Photography and WordPress Development.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
May 03, 2009 16:05 |  #5

OK i'll stay with IDE then, thanks :)


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeseph
"smells like turd"
Avatar
11,860 posts
Gallery: 264 photos
Likes: 6029
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
May 03, 2009 16:06 |  #6

I found a couple of weeks ago that XP SP1 won't even install on a laptop with a SATA drive even when set to IDE mode (XP bluescreened during setup)
Found that anything newer than XP SP2 is supposed to have drivers for SATA. What I ended up doing is making a XP install CD with SP3 slipstreamed onto it. Install then worked fine.


some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
TF posting: here :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
May 03, 2009 17:37 |  #7

My CD is XP SP0, it can't even see hard drives if you're in AHCI mode, they require IDE mode, as AHCI wasn't around when XP was released.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,101 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
IDE vs AHCI with XP32
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1332 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.